On 5/30/25 17:57, Robert Nichols via users wrote:
On 5/30/25 10:23, Barry wrote:
On 30 May 2025, at 14:14, Robert Nichols via users
wrote:
Has anybody actually used this program? Since it fails for me in two different
environments, I can't see how.
Well, the "Linux portable tar" vers
On 5/30/25 17:57, Robert Nichols via users wrote:
Thread 59 "Thread (pooled)" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 0x7fe5bbdfe6c0 (LWP 8783)]
___pthread_mutex_lock (mutex=mutex@entry=0x4054c348)
...
Looks like I'm not alone. I've added this to
https://bugzi
On 5/30/25 10:23, Barry wrote:
On 30 May 2025, at 14:14, Robert Nichols via users
wrote:
___pthread_mutex_lock (mutex=mutex@entry=0x2aed4278d06f824f)
at pthread_mutex_lock.c:80
80 unsigned int type = PTHREAD_MUTEX_TYPE_ELISION (mutex);
That mutex address looks bad. Getting a bac
> On 30 May 2025, at 14:14, Robert Nichols via users
> wrote:
>
> ___pthread_mutex_lock (mutex=mutex@entry=0x2aed4278d06f824f)
> at pthread_mutex_lock.c:80
> 80 unsigned int type = PTHREAD_MUTEX_TYPE_ELISION (mutex);
That mutex address looks bad. Getting a back trace will be useful f
apparently no decoder issue, but any time I try to do anything with the file the process
segfaults. Suspecting there might be a memory issue with these large files (7.5GB on the
largest, but same result on an 862MB file), I increased the VM's memory allocation to
32GB. No difference. There
ssue, but any time I try to do
> anything with the file the process segfaults. Suspecting there might be a
> memory issue with these large files (7.5GB on the largest, but same result on
> an 862MB file), I increased the VM's memory allocation to 32GB. No
> difference. There
I'm trying to use "shotcut", installed in a Fedora 41 virtual machine, to split
up some large mp4 files. It can read the files and play the videos just fine, so there is
apparently no decoder issue, but any time I try to do anything with the file the process
segfaults. Suspect
tooth audio is
>> completely broken under Fedora 26. Can anyone confirm this issue or at
>> least confirm that it is working for him? As this is an issue that not
>> allow to use existing hardware correctly, I would appreciate if anyone
>> having ideas to possibly working arround t
gt; least confirm that it is working for him? As this is an issue that not
> allow to use existing hardware correctly, I would appreciate if anyone
> having ideas to possibly working arround the segfaults.
>
> I am looking forward for any suggestions :)
Also, this problem isn't limi
On 08/18/2017 08:40 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> At the moment I don't know what the difference may be in the systems
>
I'm going to label this under the heading of "strange".
The system with the failure is a "pure KDE" system in that is the only desktop
installed. The only difference that I could
gt; least confirm that it is working for him? As this is an issue that not
> allow to use existing hardware correctly, I would appreciate if anyone
> having ideas to possibly working arround the segfaults.
>
> I am looking forward for any suggestions :)
>
I have a BlueTooth headset.
or at
> least confirm that it is working for him? As this is an issue that not
> allow to use existing hardware correctly, I would appreciate if anyone
> having ideas to possibly working arround the segfaults.
>
> I am looking forward for any suggestions :)
I'd suggest reporting it t
correctly, I would appreciate if anyone
having ideas to possibly working arround the segfaults.
I am looking forward for any suggestions :)
Best regards,
Florian
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 06/22/2017 12:59 PM, stan wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 14:46:45 -0400
> Kryptxy wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have been facing an issue with lightdm-gtk since I installed Fedora
>> 25 (mate desktop) in my system.
>>
>> When I boot system and try login
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 14:46:45 -0400
Kryptxy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have been facing an issue with lightdm-gtk since I installed Fedora
> 25 (mate desktop) in my system.
>
> When I boot system and try login for the first time, lightdm-gtk
> segfaults and screen goes blac
Hello,
I have been facing an issue with lightdm-gtk since I installed Fedora 25 (mate
desktop) in my system.
When I boot system and try login for the first time, lightdm-gtk segfaults and
screen goes blacks for a second or so. Then lightdm-gtk re-appears asking for
login credentials again
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 6:13 PM, Fred Smith
wrote:
>
> I set up mock on the box and proceed to try a build, using this command:
>
> mock --rebuild dvdstyler-2.9.2-1.fc20.src.rpm
I've never used mock with --rebuild but the errors are because you haven't
enabled RPM Fusion, if you have th
roblem? Try memchk.
not outside the realm of the possible,... but I wouldn't expect it to
cause only a single program to crash, and ALWAYS with the same set
of clicks/keystrokes, without fail. after installing a ton of
-debug packages and watching it in the debugger, it always segfaults
e.
> >
> > The system sits idle for some months, then I come back to it to use it
> > again, and I find that when I'm ready to create the ISO image, for
> > which I have used dvdstyler, that dvdstyler segfaults early in its
> > operation.
> >
> > I'
;The system sits idle for some months, then I come back to it to use it
> >again, and I find that when I'm ready to create the ISO image, for which
> >I have used dvdstyler, that dvdstyler segfaults early in its operation.
> >
> >I've not found a way to do what I
;m ready to create the ISO image, for
> which I have used dvdstyler, that dvdstyler segfaults early in its
> operation.
>
> I've not found a way to do what I need that doesn't segfault.
>
> This is weird, because it has hardly even been "yum update"-ed during
>
tyler segfaults early in its operation.
I've not found a way to do what I need that doesn't segfault.
This is weird, because it has hardly even been "yum update"-ed during the
interval. what would have changed? I dunno...
So, after a lot of head-banging I decided it is probably
On Sun, 2016-02-28 at 19:13 -0500, Fred Smith wrote:
> This is weird, because it has hardly even been "yum update"-ed during
> the interval. what would have changed? I dunno...
RAM problem? Try memchk.
poc
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription
a hundred tapes to DVD. Tedious,
but doable without real trouble.
The system sits idle for some months, then I come back to it to use it
again, and I find that when I'm ready to create the ISO image, for which
I have used dvdstyler, that dvdstyler segfaults early in its operation.
I've n
gimp now works again. Do not known what made this happen.
Thanks for help.
Frédéric
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guide
On Sat, 2013-02-09 at 12:30 +0100, Frédéric Bron wrote:
> > is croaking while reading/processing resource and config files.
>
> Removed that but still the same segfault.
>
> > If that doesn't do anything then try to rename resource files that gimp
> > seems to find, e.g., ~/.kde/share/config/kdeg
> I'd next try to move off any ~/.gimp* directories. It looks like gimp
> is croaking while reading/processing resource and config files.
Removed that but still the same segfault.
> If that doesn't do anything then try to rename resource files that gimp
> seems to find, e.g., ~/.kde/share/config
On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 23:09 +0100, Frédéric Bron wrote:
> > strace -o trace.lst gimp
>
> Below is the end of the trace (full log attached). Does it help?
>
> inotify_add_watch(8,
> "/usr/share/kde-settings/kde-profile/default/share/config",
> IN_MODIFY|IN_ATTRIB|IN_CLOSE_WRITE|IN_MOVE
> strace -o trace.lst gimp
Below is the end of the trace (full log attached). Does it help?
inotify_add_watch(8,
"/usr/share/kde-settings/kde-profile/default/share/config",
IN_MODIFY|IN_ATTRIB|IN_CLOSE_WRITE|IN_MOVED_FROM|IN_MOVED_TO|IN_CREATE|IN_DELETE|IN_DELETE_SELF|IN_MOVE_SELF|IN_UNMOUNT
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Frédéric Bron wrote:"
> Yes I have seen that but still do not understand if this should make
> any difference.
No. Not by default. Think of it as just an alias.
Rahul
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription opt
On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 19:58 +0100, Frédéric Bron wrote:
> > i meant the complete OS and if this is also on
> > teh latest uüdates it is not a "fresh install"
> > by definition
>
> OK after fresh install, I have of course done "yum update" but not "upgrade"
>
> >> What's the difference between up
> i meant the complete OS and if this is also on
> teh latest uüdates it is not a "fresh install"
> by definition
OK after fresh install, I have of course done "yum update" but not "upgrade"
>> What's the difference between upgrade and update?
> upgrade
> Is the same as the update command with t
Am 08.02.2013 19:12, schrieb Frédéric Bron:
>>> I have tried "yum reinstall gimp" but same issue
>> yum upgrade
>
> I have already the latest built: 2.8.2
i meant the complete OS and if this is also on
teh latest uüdates it is not a "fresh install"
by definition
> What's the difference between
>> I have tried "yum reinstall gimp" but same issue
> yum upgrade
I have already the latest built: 2.8.2
What's the difference between upgrade and update?
I always use update.
Frédéric
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admi
Am 08.02.2013 18:56, schrieb Frédéric Bron:
> on x86_64, HP Pavilion G6-2255sf.
> what can I do?
> I have tried "yum reinstall gimp" but same issue
yum upgrade
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change su
on x86_64, HP Pavilion G6-2255sf.
what can I do?
I have tried "yum reinstall gimp" but same issue.
Thanks,
Frédéric
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedorapro
Alex wrote:
> Awesome, thanks. it works great. Not sure how I missed that. I
> remembered it having been done another way.
I'm glad I could help. There's probably more than one way to do it,
but that's the way I know.
There's one last thing I should point out. Make sure that you protect
the c
Hi,
>> It won't accept an empty password. How do I create a key without a
>> password so I don't have to enter it every time I restart apache?
>
>
> Use the decrypted key in your Apache configuration as follows:
>
> # Point to the PEM-encoded certificate and private key
> SSLCertificateFile /e
Alex wrote:
> It won't accept an empty password. How do I create a key without a
> password so I don't have to enter it every time I restart apache?
Use the decrypted key in your Apache configuration as follows:
# Point to the PEM-encoded certificate and private key
SSLCertificateFile /etc/
Hi,
>> What are the steps to create a self-signed certificate for apache?
>
> These are my notes for CentOS 5, but they should still apply. The
> view/verify steps are not strictly necessary, but they are useful for
> checking your work as you go along.
>
> Create a Self-Signed SSL Certificate
Alex wrote:
> What are the steps to create a self-signed certificate for apache?
These are my notes for CentOS 5, but they should still apply. The
view/verify steps are not strictly necessary, but they are useful for
checking your work as you go along.
Create a Self-Signed SSL Certificate
Hi,
Running updates-testing I noticed once my usb modem didn't work -
caused by usb_mdoeswitch segfaulting 3 times in a row:
Oct 29 18:37:27 localhost kernel: [ 23.740625]
usb_modeswitch_[1374]: segfault at 7fff0251aff8 ip 00300087f434 sp
7fff0251b000 error 6 in libc-2.15.so[300080+
alloc fails it will return an error rather than a pointer. Now of
course a completely incompetent programmer might not bother checking the
return value, hence causing a segfault when the invalid pointer is used,
but the OP mentioned that several programs were getting segfaults in a
short period of t
nter. Now of
course a completely incompetent programmer might not bother checking the
return value, hence causing a segfault when the invalid pointer is used,
but the OP mentioned that several programs were getting segfaults in a
short period of time.
I recall thunderbird and vlc having been
be set something invalid, which later may cause a
> SEGFAULT when the pointer is dereferenced.
If malloc fails it will return an error rather than a pointer. Now of
course a completely incompetent programmer might not bother checking the
return value, hence causing a segfault when the invalid po
On 10/08/2012 02:15 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 09:46 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 10/08/2012 04:38 AM, Temlakos wrote:
Beginning about an hour ago, I've been hit with a ton of application
terminations. All of them say the same thing: "Signal 11 (SIGSEGV).
Which I be
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 10/08/2012 05:55 AM, Temlakos wrote:
>
>> Several times in the past I have shut down this computer and literally
>> waited for it to cool off. It always seemed to work, at least nine times
>> out of ten. But I never really believed that things
On 10/08/2012 11:24 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 10/08/2012 05:55 AM, Temlakos wrote:
>> Several times in the past I have shut down this computer and literally
>> waited for it to cool off. It always seemed to work, at least nine times
>> out of ten. But I never really believed that things actually wor
On 10/08/2012 05:55 AM, Temlakos wrote:
Several times in the past I have shut down this computer and literally
waited for it to cool off. It always seemed to work, at least nine times
out of ten. But I never really believed that things actually worked that
way. I shut it down overnight, and in th
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 08:55:03AM -0400, Temlakos wrote:
> Several times in the past I have shut down this computer and
> literally waited for it to cool off. It always seemed to work, at
> least nine times out of ten. But I never really believed that things
> actually worked that way. I shut it d
On 10/08/2012 03:11 AM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
On 08.10.2012, Temlakos wrote:
Beginning about an hour ago, I've been hit with a ton of application
terminations. All of them say the same thing: "Signal 11 (SIGSEGV). Which I
believe translates as "Signal segmentation violation."
[]
I bet you ha
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 09:46 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 10/08/2012 04:38 AM, Temlakos wrote:
> > Beginning about an hour ago, I've been hit with a ton of application
> > terminations. All of them say the same thing: "Signal 11 (SIGSEGV).
> > Which I believe translates as "Signal segmentation
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 09:11:13AM +0200, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> I bet you have hardware problems. E.g. faulty memory, heat problems or
> something like that..
This is likely. The other main possibility is that you've been hacked and
someone installed a rootkit that isn't perfectly compatible with y
On 10/08/2012 04:38 AM, Temlakos wrote:
Beginning about an hour ago, I've been hit with a ton of application
terminations. All of them say the same thing: "Signal 11 (SIGSEGV).
Which I believe translates as "Signal segmentation violation."
In addition to what others already wrote, check if you
On 08.10.2012, Temlakos wrote:
> Beginning about an hour ago, I've been hit with a ton of application
> terminations. All of them say the same thing: "Signal 11 (SIGSEGV). Which I
> believe translates as "Signal segmentation violation."
[]
I bet you have hardware problems. E.g. faulty memory
On 10/07/2012 08:38 PM, Temlakos wrote:
Beginning about an hour ago, I've been hit with a ton of application
terminations. All of them say the same thing: "Signal 11 (SIGSEGV).
Which I believe translates as "Signal segmentation violation."
If it were the same application, that would be one th
Beginning about an hour ago, I've been hit with a ton of application
terminations. All of them say the same thing: "Signal 11 (SIGSEGV). Which I
believe translates as "Signal segmentation violation."
If it were the same application, that would be one thing. But at least two,
and maybe three, appli
On 02/28/2012 04:50 AM, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
Hi
I'm testing 389 on Ubuntu, but currently being blocked by the admin
server cgi-bin/htmladmin segfaulting after logging in as admin from the
web gui:
[89394.801974] htmladmin[18156]: segfault at 35 ip 00403a26 sp
7fffaca24840
Hi
I'm testing 389 on Ubuntu, but currently being blocked by the admin
server cgi-bin/htmladmin segfaulting after logging in as admin from the
web gui:
[89394.801974] htmladmin[18156]: segfault at 35 ip 00403a26 sp
7fffaca24840 error 4 in htmladmin[40+7000]
I'm running
xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.9.5-1.fc14.x86_64
xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-0.0.16-13.20101010git8c8f15c.fc14.x86_64
GeForce 6600
on updated F14:
startx
xauth: creating new authority file /root/.serverauth.2649
xauth: (stdin):2: unknown command "375bb92472105b1682c2026b8efd14d3"
X.Org X Server 1.9.5
Release
Hello Everyone,
I have seen this subject in many places on the internet in my attempt at
solving
my problem on my own... But, no one offers any solutions that I found.
I want to use Banshee music player because it supports AmazonMP3 downloading.
It runs perfectly on my system IF I log into Gn
Hello,
just wondering is anybody else having problems like me with Miro these
days? Since last week after latest updates it refuses to start and just
segfaults right after starting a downloader.
Starting auto downloader...
/usr/bin/miro: line 27: 10300 Segmentation fault (core dumped
Hello Everyone,
I have seen this subject in many places on the internet in my attempt at
solving
my problem on my own... But, no one offers any solutions that I found.
I want to use Banshee music player because it supports AmazonMP3 downloading.
It runs perfectly on my system IF I log into Gn
On 11/24/2010 12:40 PM, JD wrote:
> Is this an indication of ram chip going bad? Time to run memx86 !
Probably not. More likely there's a buggy program causing this.
However, running memx86 won't hurt and will set your mind at rest.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubsc
segfault messages in /var/log/messages:
Nov 22 19:35:11 fed13 kernel: xiphos[13991]: segfault at 84 ip 4a456d3e
sp bfc70b70 error 4 in libsword-1.6.2.so[4a412000+12]
Nov 24 11:19:15 vger fed13: iphone-set-info[21463]: segfault at c ip
4e8f8f2c sp bfc2b4e0 error 6 in libimobiledevice.so.1.0.3
> After upgrade to fedora 14 from 13 gmetad process segfaults when
> updating rrd graphs. Anybody seeing this problem ?
>
> [linux2 ~]# rpm -qa | grep ganglia
> ganglia-web-3.1.7-2.fc14.i686
> ganglia-gmetad-3.1.7-2.fc14.i686
> ganglia-3.1.7-2.fc14.i686
> ganglia-gmond-3.
After upgrade to fedora 14 from 13 gmetad process segfaults when
updating rrd graphs. Anybody seeing this problem ?
[linux2 ~]# rpm -qa | grep ganglia
ganglia-web-3.1.7-2.fc14.i686
ganglia-gmetad-3.1.7-2.fc14.i686
ganglia-3.1.7-2.fc14.i686
ganglia-gmond-3.1.7-2.fc14.i686
To get around this
After upgrade to fedora 14 from 13 gmetad process segfaults when
updating rrd graphs. Anybody seeing this problem ?
[linux2 ~]# rpm -qa | grep ganglia
ganglia-web-3.1.7-2.fc14.i686
ganglia-gmetad-3.1.7-2.fc14.i686
ganglia-3.1.7-2.fc14.i686
ganglia-gmond-3.1.7-2.fc14.i686
[linux2 ~]# rpm -qa
t; machine was running 32 bit but segfaults now that I reinstalled as
> a 64
> bit os. Its a Thinkpad T61p.
> It segfaults shortly after loading /usr/lib/libnvidia-tls.so.1 so I
> suspect its failing in this Nvidia lib.
> Any suggestions?
>
>
>
&g
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Wendell Nichols wrote:
> I run 64 bit fedora core 10 and the proprietary Nvidia drivers
> (NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-173.14.22-pkg2.run). Google earth worked when the
> machine was running 32 bit but segfaults now that I reinstalled as a 64
> bit os. It
I run 64 bit fedora core 10 and the proprietary Nvidia drivers
(NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-173.14.22-pkg2.run). Google earth worked when the
machine was running 32 bit but segfaults now that I reinstalled as a 64
bit os. Its a Thinkpad T61p.
It segfaults shortly after loading /usr/lib/libnvidia
71 matches
Mail list logo
