On 3/29/25 10:35 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sat, 2025-03-29 at 10:31 -0600, home user via users wrote:
If anyone is curious, the search keys in my examples in this
thread are for pipe organ performances that I like.
Classical or another? I've occasionally been able to play real pipe
organs (theatre Wu
On 3/30/25 9:35 PM, Tim wrote:
Thank-you, Tim. (more below)
On Sun, 2025-03-30 at 15:07 -0600, home user via users wrote:
"Pirates of the Caribbean - Davy Jones's theme cover church organ by Grissini
Project"
The organist was Romain Vaudé.
"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-_qS_3KXBA";
I don
home user:
> > > "Pirates of the Caribbean - Davy Jones's theme cover church organ by
> > > Grissini Project"
> > > The organist was Romain Vaudé.
> > > "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-_qS_3KXBA";
> > > I don't know if that music is considered classical or not.
Tim:
> > It's modern music, so n
On 3/31/25 7:51 PM, Tim via users wrote:
...
"-ob9LHPEaKY" worked (11 chars), but "D-_qS_3KXBA" (11 chars) didn't,
though "-_qS_3KXBA" (10 chars) does.
That was my experience also.
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubs
On 3/31/25 7:00 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 9:56 PM Tim via users
wrote:
Tim:
For one like https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ob9LHPEaKY you can type
ob9LHPEaKY into the YouTube search gadget and it will find that clip.
And for https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-_qS_3KXBA t
On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 12:31 AM Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
> On 3/31/25 7:00 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 9:56 PM Tim via users
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Tim:
> For one like https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ob9LHPEaKY you can type
> ob9LHPEaKY into the YouTube search gadge
On 3/31/25 10:45 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 12:31 AM Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 3/31/25 7:00 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 9:56 PM Tim via users
wrote:
Tim:
For one like https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ob9LHPEaKY you can type
ob9LHPEaKY into the YouTu
On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 9:56 PM Tim via users
wrote:
>
> Tim:
> > > For one like https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ob9LHPEaKY you can type
> > > ob9LHPEaKY into the YouTube search gadget and it will find that clip.
> > > And for https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-_qS_3KXBA typing just this
> > > _qS
Tim:
> > For one like https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ob9LHPEaKY you can type
> > ob9LHPEaKY into the YouTube search gadget and it will find that clip.
> > And for https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-_qS_3KXBA typing just this
> > _qS_3KXBA bit into the search gadget works.
Go Canes:
> If you put t
On Sun, Mar 30, 2025 at 11:35 PM Tim via users
wrote:
> For one like https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ob9LHPEaKY you can type
> ob9LHPEaKY into the YouTube search gadget and it will find that clip.
> And for https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-_qS_3KXBA typing just this
> _qS_3KXBA bit into the sear
On Sun, 2025-03-30 at 15:07 -0600, home user via users wrote:
> "Pirates of the Caribbean - Davy Jones's theme cover church organ by Grissini
> Project"
> The organist was Romain Vaudé.
> "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-_qS_3KXBA";
> I don't know if that music is considered classical or not.
I
On 3/29/25 11:25 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sat, 2025-03-29 at 10:31 -0600, home user via users wrote:
...
You might want to look at 'fd', an alternative to 'find' which is very
fast and has some additional options. 'dnf info fd-find'.
Also fzf, an interactive directory searcher that
On Sat, 2025-03-29 at 10:31 -0600, home user via users wrote:
> If anyone is curious, the search keys in my examples in this
> thread are for pipe organ performances that I like.
Classical or another? I've occasionally been able to play real pipe
organs (theatre Wurlitzer, and a ~130 year old chu
On Sat, 2025-03-29 at 10:31 -0600, home user via users wrote:
> The use case (for the curious)...
> I have "link pages" (.html) of links to frequently visited and
> favorite web sites and pages. I have text files of descriptions
> and metadata for favorite web pages (example: youtube videos).
> I
On 3/27/25 10:29 PM, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 03:00:21PM -0600, home user via users wrote:
Good afternoon,
I'm trying to search a directory sub-tree for a specific string. I use this:
find . -type f -print | xargs grep -l [string] /dev/null
(but without the brackets). This
On 3/27/25 11:40 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
home user via users wrote:
On 3/26/25 8:02 PM, home user via users wrote:
On 3/26/25 7:40 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
home user via users writes:
...
I think the man page clearly indicates that the -e option
requires an argument:
Matching Contro
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 03:00:21PM -0600, home user via users wrote:
Good afternoon,
I'm trying to search a directory sub-tree for a specific string. I use this:
find . -type f -print | xargs grep -l [string] /dev/null
(but without the brackets). This often works. But it sometimes fails whe
home user via users wrote:
> On 3/26/25 8:02 PM, home user via users wrote:
>> On 3/26/25 7:40 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>>> home user via users writes:
>
>> By the way, grep's behavior suggests that the order of
>> the options matters. I did not expect that. Does the
>> order of the options rea
On 3/27/25 5:03 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
home user via users writes:
On 3/26/25 7:40 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
home user via users writes:
...
Now, try adding more not-letters-and-digits to the search string. It won't be
long before things stop working again.
$ echo 'j^k' >z
$ grep '^k' z
On 3/26/25 8:02 PM, home user via users wrote:
On 3/26/25 7:40 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
home user via users writes:
By the way, grep's behavior suggests that the order of the options matters. I
did not expect that. Does the order of the options really matter?
I was paying attention to
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 7:03 AM Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>
> home user via users writes:
>
> > On 3/26/25 7:40 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> >> home user via users writes:
> >>
> >>> I am indeed wanting the searches to skip the binary files (such as ".png"
> >>> and ".mkv" files).
> >>> I am indeed w
home user via users writes:
On 3/26/25 7:40 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
home user via users writes:
I am indeed wanting the searches to skip the binary files (such as ".png"
and ".mkv" files).
I am indeed wanting the searches to take case into account.
Now, try adding more not-letters-and-
On Wed, 2025-03-26 at 17:39 -0600, home user via users wrote:
> On 3/26/25 4:14 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Wed, 2025-03-26 at 15:47 -0600, home user via users wrote:
> > > A co-worker back in the late 1980's gave that "find" line. I'm curious:
> > > did "grep" have the -r option back t
On 3/26/25 7:40 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
home user via users writes:
I am indeed wanting the searches to skip the binary files (such as ".png" and
".mkv" files).
I am indeed wanting the searches to take case into account.
Now, try adding more not-letters-and-digits to the search string. It
home user via users writes:
I am indeed wanting the searches to skip the binary files (such as ".png"
and ".mkv" files).
I am indeed wanting the searches to take case into account.
Now, try adding more not-letters-and-digits to the search string. It won't
be long before things stop working
On 3/26/25 5:43 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 3/26/25 4:35 PM, home user via users wrote:
[snip]
The results are correct. But notice that the case sensitive search took over 7
1/4 MINUTES; the case INsensitive search took less than 1/20 second. That's a
nearly 4 orders of magnitude difference!
On 3/26/25 4:35 PM, home user via users wrote:
Good evening,
Well, I though it was solved. But something is still awry
-
bash.3[ShiPin]: time grope -ob9LHPEaKY
Western/.Organ/organ_dir.txt
real 0m0.043s
user 0m0.010s
sys 0m0.016s
bash.4[ShiPin]: time Grope -ob9LHPEaKY
Western/
On 3/26/25 4:14 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Wed, 2025-03-26 at 15:47 -0600, home user via users wrote:
A co-worker back in the late 1980's gave that "find" line. I'm curious: did
"grep" have the -r option back then?
Maybe my memory is faulty but I don't remember grep ever not having th
Good evening,
Well, I though it was solved. But something is still awry
-
bash.3[ShiPin]: time grope -ob9LHPEaKY
Western/.Organ/organ_dir.txt
real0m0.043s
user0m0.010s
sys 0m0.016s
bash.4[ShiPin]: time Grope -ob9LHPEaKY
Western/.Organ/organ_dir.txt
real7m15.297s
user
On 3/26/25 2:49 PM, Go Canes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 5:19 PM Jerry James wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 3:01 PM home user via users
wrote:
I'm trying to search a directory sub-tree for a specific string. I use this:
find . -type f -print | xargs grep -l [string] /dev/null
[...]
Ho
On Wed, 2025-03-26 at 15:47 -0600, home user via users wrote:
> A co-worker back in the late 1980's gave that "find" line. I'm curious: did
> "grep" have the -r option back then?
Maybe my memory is faulty but I don't remember grep ever not having the
'-r' option and I've been using it since the
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 5:48 PM home user via users
wrote:
> The sub-tree I'm searching is loaded with huge binary files along with some
> ".txt" files. The searches take several minutes each. How do I restrict the
> search to ".txt" files? ...
Same as my previous reply, adding .txt to the w
On 3/26/25 3:52 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 3/26/25 2:49 PM, Go Canes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 5:19 PM Jerry James wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 3:01 PM home user via users
wrote:
I'm trying to search a directory sub-tree for a specific string. I use this:
find . -type f -print | xar
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 5:52 PM Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
> On 3/26/25 2:49 PM, Go Canes wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 5:19 PM Jerry James wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 3:01 PM home user via users
> >> wrote:
> >>> I'm trying to search a directory sub-tree for a specific string. I us
On 3/26/25 3:17 PM, Jerry James wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 3:01 PM home user via users
wrote:
Good afternoon,
I'm trying to search a directory sub-tree for a specific string. I use this:
find . -type f -print | xargs grep -l [string] /dev/null
(but without the brackets). This often wor
On 3/26/25 2:47 PM, home user via users wrote:
Part 2
The sub-tree I'm searching is loaded with huge binary files along with
some ".txt" files. The searches take several minutes each. How do I
restrict the search to ".txt" files? ...
-I
--
___
us
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 5:19 PM Jerry James wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 3:01 PM home user via users
> wrote:
> > I'm trying to search a directory sub-tree for a specific string. I use
> > this:
> >
> > find . -type f -print | xargs grep -l [string] /dev/null
[...]
> > How do I get this t
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 3:01 PM home user via users
wrote:
> Good afternoon,
>
> I'm trying to search a directory sub-tree for a specific string. I use this:
>
> find . -type f -print | xargs grep -l [string] /dev/null
>
> (but without the brackets). This often works. But it sometimes fails whe
Good afternoon,
I'm trying to search a directory sub-tree for a specific string. I use this:
find . -type f -print | xargs grep -l [string] /dev/null
(but without the brackets). This often works. But it sometimes fails when the search
string contains "printable" characters other than letter
39 matches
Mail list logo
