Re: Seamonkey not displaying pix

Beartooth composed on 2024-06-29 14:51 (UTC): > On Fri, 28 Jun 2024 15:44:01 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: >> Renaming ~/.mozilla/seamonkey is a sledgehammer. SeaMonkey has a >> -profilemanager switch same as Firefox, for adding, deleting & modifying >> profiles, includ

Re: Seamonkey not displaying pix

On Fri, 28 Jun 2024 15:44:01 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: > Beartooth composed on 2024-06-28 15:51 (UTC): > >>> Beartooth wrote: > >>>>Seamonkey under the last several releases of Fedora Linux does not >>>> display pix. It says, inter alia, "Error

Re: Seamonkey not displaying pix

On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 3:44 PM Felix Miata wrote: > Beartooth composed on 2024-06-28 15:51 (UTC): > >> Beartooth wrote: > >>> Seamonkey under the last several releases of Fedora Linux does not > >>> display pix. It says, inter alia, "Error: could no

Re: Seamonkey not displaying pix

Beartooth composed on 2024-06-28 15:51 (UTC): >> Beartooth wrote: >>> Seamonkey under the last several releases of Fedora Linux does not >>> display pix. It says, inter alia, "Error: could not load." It also >>> gives me a link to Media Viewer; but

Re: Seamonkey not displaying pix

On 6/28/24 10:51 AM, Beartooth wrote: On Wed, 26 Jun 2024 10:55:32 -0500, Thomas Cameron wrote: On 6/26/24 10:25 AM, I Beartooth wrote: Seamonkey under the last several releases of Fedora Linux does not display pix. It says, inter alia, "Error: could not load." It also gives

Re: Seamonkey not displaying pix

On Wed, 26 Jun 2024 10:55:32 -0500, Thomas Cameron wrote: > On 6/26/24 10:25 AM, I Beartooth wrote: >> Seamonkey under the last several releases of Fedora Linux does not >> display pix. It says, inter alia, "Error: could not load." It also >> gives me a lin

Re: Seamonkey not displaying pix

On 6/26/24 10:25 AM, Beartooth wrote: Seamonkey under the last several releases of Fedora Linux does not display pix. It says, inter alia, "Error: could not load." It also gives me a link to Media Viewer; but the help page for that is over my head. I tried posting vi

Seamonkey not displaying pix

Seamonkey under the last several releases of Fedora Linux does not display pix. It says, inter alia, "Error: could not load." It also gives me a link to Media Viewer; but the help page for that is over my head. I tried posting via Gmane to seamonkey.user, but have had n

Re: Seamonkey settings??

On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 19:37:28 -0300 Fernando Cassia wrote: > Next time just press Alt-F and the menu bar becomes viewable. > > That's the beauty of CUA (Common User Access) menus... > > Every item usually has an associated hotkey. Thanks, wasn't aware of this. ___

Re: Seamonkey settings??

On Mon, 05 Oct 2020 13:33:30 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 10/5/20 1:20 PM, Beartooth wrote: >> On Mon, 05 Oct 2020 12:50:51 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: >> [...] > Edit -> Preferences ? Sounds good -- except that I don't see Edit ... >>> >>> Do you see the menu bar at all? Di

Re: Seamonkey settings??

e: > > On my Seamonkey, I see that each line at the top starts with white > > dots.  When I click in them, that line is hidden, and the white dots > > migrate below the top items.  If I then click the dots for that > > line, it re-opens the line whose dots I

Re: Seamonkey settings??

On Mon, Oct 5, 2020, 18:43 stan via users wrote: > On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 13:59:10 -0700 > Samuel Sieb wrote: > > > On 10/5/20 1:32 PM, stan via users wrote: > > > > On my Seamonkey, I see that each line at the top starts with white > > > dots. When I click i

Re: Seamonkey settings??

On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 13:59:10 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 10/5/20 1:32 PM, stan via users wrote: > > On my Seamonkey, I see that each line at the top starts with white > > dots. When I click in them, that line is hidden, and the white dots > > migrate below the top items.

Re: Seamonkey settings??

On 10/5/20 1:32 PM, stan via users wrote: On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 19:26:58 - (UTC) Beartooth wrote: On Mon, 05 Oct 2020 12:18:08 -0700, stan via users wrote: On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 18:54:20 - (UTC) Beartooth wrote: Where are the settings for Seamonkey? Edit -> Preferen

Re: Seamonkey settings??

On 10/5/20 1:20 PM, Beartooth wrote: On Mon, 05 Oct 2020 12:50:51 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: [...] Edit -> Preferences ? Sounds good -- except that I don't see Edit ... Do you see the menu bar at all? Did you hide it? Certainly not on purpose. Where would it be, and

Re: Seamonkey settings??

On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 19:26:58 - (UTC) Beartooth wrote: > On Mon, 05 Oct 2020 12:18:08 -0700, stan via users wrote: > > > On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 18:54:20 - (UTC) > > Beartooth wrote: > > > >>Where are the settings for Seamonkey? > > > > E

Re: Seamonkey settings??

On Mon, 05 Oct 2020 12:50:51 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: [...] >>> Edit -> Preferences ? >> >> Sounds good -- except that I don't see Edit ... > > Do you see the menu bar at all? Did you hide it? Certainly not on purpose. Where would it be, and how would I unhide it? What do

Re: Seamonkey settings??

On 10/5/20 12:26 PM, Beartooth wrote: On Mon, 05 Oct 2020 12:18:08 -0700, stan via users wrote: On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 18:54:20 - (UTC) Beartooth wrote: Where are the settings for Seamonkey? Edit -> Preferences ? Sounds good -- except that I don't see Edit ...

Re: Seamonkey settings??

On Mon, 05 Oct 2020 12:18:08 -0700, stan via users wrote: > On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 18:54:20 - (UTC) > Beartooth wrote: > >> Where are the settings for Seamonkey? > > Edit -> Preferences ? Sounds good -- except that I don't see Edit ... -- Bea

Re: Seamonkey settings??

On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 18:54:20 - (UTC) Beartooth wrote: > Where are the settings for Seamonkey? Edit -> Preferences ? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproje

Seamonkey settings??

Where are the settings for Seamonkey? I'm running seamonkey-2.53.4-1.fc32.x86_64 under F32 fully updated. I've right- and left-clicked all over it, and I can't seem to get into any configuration worth doing. What am I missing? TIA! -- Beartooth Staffwright, Not Quite

Re: seamonkey

gt; From: "Kevin Cummings" > To: "Community support for Fedora users" > Subject: Re: seamonkey > > On 03/18/16 12:18, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Is there a plan to distribute the last version of seamonkey (2.40) > > with fedora

Re: seamonkey

On 03/18/16 12:18, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Hello, > > Is there a plan to distribute the last version of seamonkey (2.40) > with fedora ? Looks to me like its already in updates-testing (at least for F2

seamonkey

Hello, Is there a plan to distribute the last version of seamonkey (2.40) with fedora ? Thank. === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmos

Re: seamonkey crashes

A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France === > Sent: Saturday, August 01, 2015 at 9:56 AM > From: "Patrick O'Callaghan" > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: seamonkey crashes > > On Sat, 2015-08-01 at 02:04 +0200, Patrick Dup

Re: seamonkey crashes

On Sat, 2015-08-01 at 02:04 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Hello, > > In fedora 22 (i686) seamonkey web! > core dump. What do you expect people to do with that information? You don't say what URL it crashed on, if you're using a nightly, if you have extensions loaded, if t

seamonkey crashes

Hello, In fedora 22 (i686) seamonkey web! core dump. === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d&

Re: Pale moon, was Re: replacement for seamonkey?

On 17 May 2014 17:42, Fernando Cassia wrote: > On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 6:23 AM, Paul Cartwright > wrote: >> >> I am beginning to like Pale moon.. pulled in all my Chrome bookmarks ( >> awesome, automatic!), and it is VERY snappy! > > > What's the track record of this fork for security fixes? > Do

Re: replacement for seamonkey?

Gary Stainburn writes: > On Friday 16 May 2014 06:57:57 lee wrote: >> Hi, >> >> are we going to need a replacement for seamonkey which comes without >> restrictions management, and will there be one in Fedora? >> >> >> -- >> Fedora release 20 (

Re: replacement for seamonkey?

On Friday 16 May 2014 06:57:57 lee wrote: > Hi, > > are we going to need a replacement for seamonkey which comes without > restrictions management, and will there be one in Fedora? > > > -- > Fedora release 20 (Heisenbug) I've obviously missed something. Can someone

Re: replacement for seamonkey?

Tim writes: > On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 07:57 +0200, lee wrote: >> are we going to need a replacement for seamonkey which comes without >> restrictions management, > > Care to clarify that double negative? You want something with > restrictions? No, just seamonkey, or a sui

Re: Pale moon, was Re: replacement for seamonkey?

On 05/18/14 01:53, Bob Marcan wrote: Still have problem with tabs. Not sure what you are having trouble with but, again from m notes, I do this: 2013-11-17 To clear the ugly New Tab screen of button-blocks ~ In the Location bar, type about:config and press Enter. Type browser.newtab.url in

Re: Pale moon, was Re: replacement for seamonkey?

On Sat, 17 May 2014 21:19:18 -0400 "Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA" wrote: > From my notes: > > 2014-05-10 > > Firefox 29 requires the following add-on if it is to be made usable. > > https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/classicthemerestorer/ > > then see: > > https://support.mo

Re: Pale moon, was Re: replacement for seamonkey?

On 05/17/14 21:07, Bob Marcan wrote: The latest Firefox (v.29) is for me indigestible (putting it mildly). So this looks promising. Does anybody knows how to disable tabbed browsing? Changed preferenced the same way as in firefox. Middle button still open window in tabs instead of new window. T

Re: Pale moon, was Re: replacement for seamonkey?

The latest Firefox (v.29) is for me indigestible (putting it mildly). So this looks promising. Does anybody knows how to disable tabbed browsing? Changed preferenced the same way as in firefox. Middle button still open window in tabs instead of new window. TIA, Bob -- users mailing list users@lis

Re: Pale moon, was Re: replacement for seamonkey?

On 5/17/2014 4:37 PM, David wrote: > On 5/17/2014 4:00 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote: >> >> On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Paul Cartwright > > wrote: >> >> Absolutely! Pale Moon is built from the Firefox release source code >> that has a large community of devel

Re: Pale moon, was Re: replacement for seamonkey?

On 5/17/2014 4:00 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote: > > On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Paul Cartwright > wrote: > > Absolutely! Pale Moon is built from the Firefox release source code > that has a large community of developers and security-aware people, > ne

Re: Pale moon, was Re: replacement for seamonkey?

On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Paul Cartwright wrote: > Absolutely! Pale Moon is built from the Firefox release source code that > has a large community of developers and security-aware people, next to > having seen over a decade of development by now. It includes, among other > things, protecti

Re: Pale moon, was Re: replacement for seamonkey?

On 05/17/2014 11:42 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote: What's the track record of this fork for security fixes? Do they patch in hours, days or weeks after a 0day is discovered for FF? from the Pale moon site: http://www.palemoon.org/faq.shtml#Is_Pa

Re: Pale moon, was Re: replacement for seamonkey?

On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 6:23 AM, Paul Cartwright wrote: > I am beginning to like Pale moon.. pulled in all my Chrome bookmarks ( > awesome, automatic!), and it is VERY snappy! > What's the track record of this fork for security fixes? Do they patch in hours, days or weeks after a 0day is discover

Pale moon, was Re: replacement for seamonkey?

On 05/16/2014 11:50 AM, Doug wrote: > If Seamonkey is the thing you call Firefox (pffft!) then go get Pale > Moon. > --doug I am beginning to like Pale moon.. pulled in all my Chrome bookmarks ( awesome, automatic!), and it is VERY snappy! I haven't figured out yet how to view fl

Re: replacement for seamonkey?

On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 07:57 +0200, lee wrote: > are we going to need a replacement for seamonkey which comes without > restrictions management, Care to clarify that double negative? You want something with restrictions? -- tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp Linux 3.14.3-200.fc20.i686 #1 S

Re: replacement for seamonkey?

Fernando Cassia writes: Yes Seamonkey suite was born first as Mozilla. But it isn't "old". I mean, it incoporates the latest technologies and Firefox Gecko engine And as I understand it, this conversation shouldn't *just* be about Seamonkey. Since Mozilla is doing

Re: replacement for seamonkey?

On 05/16/2014 03:56 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: > > If you look at the "Downloads" page, you'd find a link to: > > http://www.palemoon.org/contributed-builds.shtml > > and on that page, "PM4Linux". if you hoover over the downloads tab, THEN scroll past Pale Moon & language packs, you get to OTHER.

Re: replacement for seamonkey?

On 05/16/2014 12:56 PM, Paul Cartwright wrote: On 05/16/2014 03:52 PM, Dan Thurman wrote: See: http://www.palemoon.org/contributed-builds.shtml thanks, got it, installed it! when I finished it opened up a web page & said: You have successfully installed the Pale Moon web browser for Windows.

Re: replacement for seamonkey?

On 05/16/2014 12:34 PM, Paul Cartwright issued this missive: On 05/16/2014 02:43 PM, Doug wrote: You haven't read the right pages, I guess. It runs on Windows and Linux, and I thik even on Mac. I have a copy running right here on PCLinuxOS-32 KDE. I have another copy running on Windows 8.1. (

Re: replacement for seamonkey?

On 05/16/2014 03:52 PM, Dan Thurman wrote: >> > See: http://www.palemoon.org/contributed-builds.shtml thanks, got it, installed it! when I finished it opened up a web page & said: You have successfully installed the Pale Moon web browser for Windows. -- Paul Cartwright Registered Linux User #36

Re: replacement for seamonkey?

On 05/16/2014 12:34 PM, Paul Cartwright wrote: On 05/16/2014 02:43 PM, Doug wrote: You haven't read the right pages, I guess. It runs on Windows and Linux, and I thik even on Mac. I have a copy running right here on PCLinuxOS-32 KDE. I have another copy running on Windows 8.1. (64-bit.) This

Re: replacement for seamonkey?

On 05/16/2014 02:43 PM, Doug wrote: You haven't read the right pages, I guess. It runs on Windows and Linux, and I thik even on Mac. I have a copy running right here on PCLinuxOS-32 KDE.  I have another copy running on Windows 8.1. (

Re: replacement for seamonkey?

On 05/16/2014 12:29 PM, Paul Cartwright wrote: On 05/16/2014 11:50 AM, Doug wrote: If Seamonkey is the thing you call Firefox (pffft!) then go get Pale Moon. --doug according to the Pale Moon website it requires: * Windows Vista x64/Windows 7 x64/Windows 8 x64/Server 2008 x64 or later

Re: replacement for seamonkey?

On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > Seamonkey is the name given to the old Mozilla browser/email/kitchen-sink > suite that was developed by Mozilla prior to firefox. (Not the > older/original > Netscape. > Yes Seamonkey suite was born first as Mozilla. But it isn&

Re: replacement for seamonkey?

On 05/16/2014 11:50 AM, Doug wrote: > If Seamonkey is the thing you call Firefox (pffft!) then go get Pale > Moon. > --doug according to the Pale Moon website it requires: * Windows Vista x64/Windows 7 x64/Windows 8 x64/Server 2008 x64 or later -- Paul Cartwright Registered L

Re: replacement for seamonkey?

On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 13:19 -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote: > I personally use Seamonkey suite and prefer it to Firefox. But while I > have > no issues with DRM, maybe the SM devs can put the DRM bits in an > optional > package or at least make it user-configurable to disable the

Re: replacement for seamonkey?

On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 2:57 AM, lee wrote: > are we going to need a replacement for seamonkey which comes without > restrictions management, and will there be one in Fedora? > Take your concerns to the Seamonkey Council http://www.seamonkey-project.org/about#contact I personally use

Re: replacement for seamonkey?

On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 11:50:50AM -0400, Doug wrote: > > On 05/16/2014 01:57 AM, lee wrote: > >Hi, > > > >are we going to need a replacement for seamonkey which comes without > >restrictions management, and will there be one in Fedora? > > > > > If S

Re: replacement for seamonkey?

On 05/16/2014 01:57 AM, lee wrote: Hi, are we going to need a replacement for seamonkey which comes without restrictions management, and will there be one in Fedora? If Seamonkey is the thing you call Firefox (pffft!) then go get Pale Moon. --doug -- users mailing list users

replacement for seamonkey?

Hi, are we going to need a replacement for seamonkey which comes without restrictions management, and will there be one in Fedora? -- Fedora release 20 (Heisenbug) -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https

Re: (Fedora 13) Seamonkey 2.0.x constantly crashing

Bill Davidsen wrote: > I suggest you D/L the Mozilla version, unpack it (generates "seamonkey" > dir), and move the directory to a reasonable place (/usr/local for me) > and generate a custom icon for it. That seems solid. Seamonkey users, I'm happy to announce that the

Re: (Fedora 13) Seamonkey 2.0.x constantly crashing

ment 9: >> Thanks for checking this out. There is/was another issue which would turn up >> when we use the internal cairo. >> This is basically sorted out and I'll drive switching to internal cairo asap >> (either 11.4 or even for security updates given this bugreport). &g

Re: (Fedora 13) Seamonkey 2.0.x - bundling external libraries

xes should be fixed in the > one library, and hence fix all applications against that issue. If there > was no such policy, then it would essentially be impossible to fix any > security issue against the library, because it becomes hidden in N > application binaries. > Given that the lib

Re: (Fedora 13) Seamonkey 2.0.x - bundling external libraries

On 07/10/10 20:07, Mason wrote: > Is anyone aware of any potential issue when using Mozilla's private > libcairo on Fedora 13? Fedora packaging guidelines [1] prevents bundling external libraries. Main reason [2] is that security and bug fixes should be fixed in the one library, and hence fix all a

Re: (Fedora 13) Seamonkey 2.0.x constantly crashing

ment 9: >> Thanks for checking this out. There is/was another issue which would turn up >> when we use the internal cairo. >> This is basically sorted out and I'll drive switching to internal cairo asap >> (either 11.4 or even for security updates given this bugreport). &g

Re: (Fedora 13) Seamonkey 2.0.x constantly crashing

David Timms wrote: > Mason wrote: > >> What can I do to make it happen? > > Help the maintainer, by testing the proposed fix yourself with an rpmbuild: > > 1. yum downloader --source name-of-package(or parent package) > 2. extract the rpm > 3. test your rpmbuild capability works with the existin

Re: (Fedora 13) Seamonkey 2.0.x constantly crashing

On 06/10/10 20:04, Mason wrote: > What can I do to make it happen? Help the maintainer, by testing the proposed fix yourself with an rpmbuild: 1. yum downloader --source name-of-package(or parent package) 2. extract the rpm 3. test your rpmbuild capability works with the existing packages as is 4.

(Fedora 13) Seamonkey 2.0.x constantly crashing

Hello everyone, The Seamonkey 2.0.x package in Fedora 13 is unusable, as it crashes randomly, sometimes within seconds. This problem has been well-known for months. Fedora bug report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602437 Mozilla bug report: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org