On 06/19/2012 04:54 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 06/03/2012 06:28 AM, JD wrote:
On 06/02/2012 08:02 PM, Edward M wrote:
On 06/02/2012 06:09 PM, JD wrote:
run rpm -ivh --nosignature xdfr-2.0.1.src.rpm
but rpm exits with error message:
error: xdfr-2.0.1.src.rpm: rpmReadSignature failed: sigh lo
On 06/03/2012 06:28 AM, JD wrote:
On 06/02/2012 08:02 PM, Edward M wrote:
On 06/02/2012 06:09 PM, JD wrote:
run rpm -ivh --nosignature xdfr-2.0.1.src.rpm
but rpm exits with error message:
error: xdfr-2.0.1.src.rpm: rpmReadSignature failed: sigh load: BAD
error: xdfe-2.0.1.src.rpm cannot be inst
On 06/03/2012 02:04 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/03/2012 04:33 PM, JD wrote:
On 06/03/2012 12:53 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/03/2012 03:46 PM, Edward M wrote:
And probably also the --delsign and --addsign if --resign does not do wonders
on
the package?
Yep
FWIW, key ID 2e1efa87 seems it
On 06/03/2012 02:23 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/03/2012 05:26 PM, Edward M wrote:
On 06/03/2012 01:33 AM, JD wrote:
On 06/03/2012 12:53 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/03/2012 03:46 PM, Edward M wrote:
And probably also the --delsign and --addsign if --resign does not do wonders
on
the package?
On 06/03/2012 05:26 PM, Edward M wrote:
> On 06/03/2012 01:33 AM, JD wrote:
>> On 06/03/2012 12:53 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> On 06/03/2012 03:46 PM, Edward M wrote:
And probably also the --delsign and --addsign if --resign does not do
wonders on
the package?
>>> Yep
>>>
>>> FWI
On 06/03/2012 01:33 AM, JD wrote:
On 06/03/2012 12:53 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/03/2012 03:46 PM, Edward M wrote:
And probably also the --delsign and --addsign if --resign does not
do wonders on
the package?
Yep
FWIW, key ID 2e1efa87 seems it *may* be an OpenSuse key. But, I
could n
On 06/03/2012 04:31 PM, JD wrote:
> Yeah... After I setup my gpg sig properly
You don't need that to --delsign
rpm -qpvv zzuf-0.13-4.20100215.fc16.i686.rpm gives
D: zzuf-0.13-4.20100215.fc16.i686.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID
a82ba4b7: OK
then
rpmsign --delsign zzuf-0.13-4.20100
On 06/03/2012 04:33 PM, JD wrote:
> On 06/03/2012 12:53 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 06/03/2012 03:46 PM, Edward M wrote:
>>> And probably also the --delsign and --addsign if --resign does not do
>>> wonders on
>>> the package?
>> Yep
>>
>> FWIW, key ID 2e1efa87 seems it *may* be an OpenSuse k
On 06/03/2012 12:53 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/03/2012 03:46 PM, Edward M wrote:
And probably also the --delsign and --addsign if --resign does not do wonders
on
the package?
Yep
FWIW, key ID 2e1efa87 seems it *may* be an OpenSuse key. But, I could not find
anything on xfdr or xfde.
On 06/03/2012 12:46 AM, Edward M wrote:
On 06/03/2012 12:35 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
I'd go with the --resign option.
And probably also the --delsign and --addsign if --resign does not
do wonders on the package?
Yeah... After I setup my gpg sig properly.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fe
On 06/03/2012 03:46 PM, Edward M wrote:
> And probably also the --delsign and --addsign if --resign does not do
> wonders on
> the package?
Yep
FWIW, key ID 2e1efa87 seems it *may* be an OpenSuse key. But, I could not find
anything on xfdr or xfde.
--
Never be afraid to laugh at yoursel
On 06/03/2012 12:35 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
I'd go with the --resign option.
And probably also the --delsign and --addsign if --resign does not
do wonders on the package?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedorapr
On 06/03/2012 03:35 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> I'd go with the --resign option.
Or even --delsign
--
Never be afraid to laugh at yourself, after all, you could be missing out on
the joke
of the century. -- Dame Edna Everage
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or cha
On 06/03/2012 03:07 PM, JD wrote:
> Well, of course I had to copy the file into the
> mounted fc14 image in order for me to use
> it's rpm command while chrooted.
>
> In chrooted env (i.e. fc14):
> $ cd /tmp
> $ sha256sum xfdr-2.0.1.src.rpm
> 2b3a033030f39ae790d790202fe6df9b096a00df05e6a830dee8655
On 06/03/2012 02:36 PM, Edward M wrote:
>does rpm still has the option to resign, like rpm --resign, if it does
> that may
> help?
>However i still a think along the way a security update to rpm is blocking
> for a
> reason or
>the src package in question has problems and a fix is ne
On 06/02/2012 11:34 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/03/2012 02:15 PM, JD wrote:
D: Using legacy gpg-pubkey(s) from rpmdb
error:xfdr-2.0.1.src.rpm: rpmReadSignature failed: sigh load: BAD
error:xfdr-2.0.1.src.rpm: not an rpm package (or package manifest)
D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Name
D
On 06/03/2012 02:15 PM, JD wrote:
> D: Using legacy gpg-pubkey(s) from rpmdb
> error:xfdr-2.0.1.src.rpm: rpmReadSignature failed: sigh load: BAD
> error:xfdr-2.0.1.src.rpm: not an rpm package (or package manifest)
> D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Name
> D: closed db index /var/lib/
On 06/02/2012 11:15 PM, JD wrote:
On 06/02/2012 11:05 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/03/2012 01:51 PM, JD wrote:
D: Expected size: 9392994 =
lead(96)+sigs(348)+pad(4)+data(9392546)
D: Actual size: 9392994
warning: xfdr-2.0.1.src.rpm: Header V3 DSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID
2e1efa87: NOK
On 06/02/2012 11:05 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/03/2012 01:51 PM, JD wrote:
D: Expected size: 9392994 = lead(96)+sigs(348)+pad(4)+data(9392546)
D: Actual size: 9392994
warning: xfdr-2.0.1.src.rpm: Header V3 DSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID 2e1efa87:
NOKEY
xfdr-2.0.1.x86_64
D: closed db
On 06/03/2012 01:51 PM, JD wrote:
> D: Expected size: 9392994 = lead(96)+sigs(348)+pad(4)+data(9392546)
> D: Actual size: 9392994
> warning: xfdr-2.0.1.src.rpm: Header V3 DSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID 2e1efa87:
> NOKEY
> xfdr-2.0.1.x86_64
> D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Name
> D
On 06/02/2012 09:46 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/03/2012 12:39 PM, JD wrote:
But Ed, as I replied to another OP,
I mounted an old fc14 dd image, I copied the src rpm to
the fc14 mount point's /tmp, I chrooted to the mount point
and ran rpm -qlp, and it worked just fine. All the files were
listed
On 06/03/2012 12:39 PM, JD wrote:
> But Ed, as I replied to another OP,
> I mounted an old fc14 dd image, I copied the src rpm to
> the fc14 mount point's /tmp, I chrooted to the mount point
> and ran rpm -qlp, and it worked just fine. All the files were
> listed.
> No error messages at all.
You
On 06/02/2012 08:49 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/03/2012 11:37 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/03/2012 11:29 AM, JD wrote:
Not really. It is not a fedora rpm, as I stated.
Noreally
Even if it is *not* a fedora rpm an unsigned or non-fedora signed rpm will not
return
an error.
An unsigned
On 06/03/2012 11:37 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 06/03/2012 11:29 AM, JD wrote:
>> Not really. It is not a fedora rpm, as I stated.
> Noreally
>
> Even if it is *not* a fedora rpm an unsigned or non-fedora signed rpm will
> not return
> an error.
>
> An unsigned rpm will simply return the n
On 06/03/2012 11:29 AM, JD wrote:
> Not really. It is not a fedora rpm, as I stated.
Noreally
Even if it is *not* a fedora rpm an unsigned or non-fedora signed rpm will not
return
an error.
An unsigned rpm will simply return the name of the rpm.
A signed rpm will return information ab
On 06/02/2012 08:24 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/03/2012 11:23 AM, JD wrote:
rpm -qp xdfr-2.0.1.src.rpm
error: xdfr-2.0.1.src.rpm: rpmReadSignature failed: sigh load: BAD
error: xdfr-2.0.1.src.rpm: not an rpm package (or package manifest)
You have a corrupt rpm.
Not really. It is not a fedora
On 06/02/2012 08:02 PM, Edward M wrote:
On 06/02/2012 06:09 PM, JD wrote:
run rpm -ivh --nosignature xdfr-2.0.1.src.rpm
but rpm exits with error message:
error: xdfr-2.0.1.src.rpm: rpmReadSignature failed: sigh load: BAD
error: xdfe-2.0.1.src.rpm cannot be installed
I *think* the problem s
On 06/03/2012 11:23 AM, JD wrote:
> rpm -qp xdfr-2.0.1.src.rpm
> error: xdfr-2.0.1.src.rpm: rpmReadSignature failed: sigh load: BAD
> error: xdfr-2.0.1.src.rpm: not an rpm package (or package manifest)
You have a corrupt rpm.
--
Never be afraid to laugh at yourself, after all, you could be miss
On 06/02/2012 07:02 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/03/2012 09:09 AM, JD wrote:
I have a source rpm (non-fedora).
It has no signature.
I tried to run rpm -ivh --nosignature xdfr-2.0.1.src.rpm
but rpm exits with error message:
error: xdfr-2.0.1.src.rpm: rpmReadSignature failed: sigh load: BAD
error:
On 06/02/2012 06:09 PM, JD wrote:
run rpm -ivh --nosignature xdfr-2.0.1.src.rpm
but rpm exits with error message:
error: xdfr-2.0.1.src.rpm: rpmReadSignature failed: sigh load: BAD
error: xdfe-2.0.1.src.rpm cannot be installed
I *think* the problem sits with the person/group who produced th
On 06/03/2012 09:09 AM, JD wrote:
> I have a source rpm (non-fedora).
> It has no signature.
> I tried to run rpm -ivh --nosignature xdfr-2.0.1.src.rpm
> but rpm exits with error message:
> error: xdfr-2.0.1.src.rpm: rpmReadSignature failed: sigh load: BAD
> error: xdfe-2.0.1.src.rpm cannot be inst
I have a source rpm (non-fedora).
It has no signature.
I tried to run rpm -ivh --nosignature xdfr-2.0.1.src.rpm
but rpm exits with error message:
error: xdfr-2.0.1.src.rpm: rpmReadSignature failed: sigh load: BAD
error: xdfe-2.0.1.src.rpm cannot be installed
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedo
32 matches
Mail list logo
