On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> yes, i realize there are a *ton* of additional packages, but
> students are regularly asking me how to do things that aren't
> immediately supported in git,
Not sure I can can help you here, but could you tell me what students
are doi
kind of a wide-open question, but i'm updating both an intro and
advanced git course, and as i teach them both on fedora, i'm
interested in which of the large number of *additional* git-related
fedora packages people find useful on a regular basis.
yes, i realize there are a *ton* of addition
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Manuel Escudero wrote:
> Hope these things help the official Maintainer...
>
Open a bug report and post these packages there. There is no guarantee
he/she will be able to see it here.
--
Suvayu
Open source is the future. It sets us free.
--
users mailing list
ly" Rix
>
> On Wed 16 March 2011 03:24:16 Manuel Escudero wrote:
> > I bring to you 32 & 64 bits RPM packages for Kmess 2.0.6.1-0 to install
> on
> > your F14 Systems!!!
> >
> > I've just finished building and testing them, you can download the
> packag
I bring to you 32 & 64 bits RPM packages for Kmess 2.0.6.1-0 to install on
your F14 Systems!!!
I've just finished building and testing them, you can download the packages
from here:
32 Bits Systems: http://goo.gl/Us6pt
64 Bits Systems: http://goo.gl/eNrgh
P.S. I also have the &
On 01/31/2011 12:44 PM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 11:04 -0600, Paul B Schroeder wrote:
>>
>> On 01/30/2011 02:35 PM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 12:21 -0600, Paul B Schroeder wrote:
>>>> Hello all..
>>>>
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 11:04 -0600, Paul B Schroeder wrote:
>
> On 01/30/2011 02:35 PM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 12:21 -0600, Paul B Schroeder wrote:
> >> Hello all..
> >>
> >> We have some RPM packages which have been built on a syste
On 01/30/2011 02:35 PM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 12:21 -0600, Paul B Schroeder wrote:
>> Hello all..
>>
>> We have some RPM packages which have been built on a system with RPM
>> version 4.4.2.3 and are being installed on F14 based systems with
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 12:21 -0600, Paul B Schroeder wrote:
> Hello all..
>
> We have some RPM packages which have been built on a system with RPM
> version 4.4.2.3 and are being installed on F14 based systems with
> 4.8.1.. We are creating the delta RPM packages on the
Hello all..
We have some RPM packages which have been built on a system with RPM
version 4.4.2.3 and are being installed on F14 based systems with
4.8.1.. We are creating the delta RPM packages on the F14 system with
makedeltarpm 3.6.
So package foo version 1 installs on the F14 systems just
On Friday 05 November 2010 08:32 PM, Nick Urbanik wrote:
> On 05/11/10 20:00 -0700, suvayu ali wrote:
>> On 5 November 2010 18:53, Nick Urbanik wrote:
>>> How do you determine the appropriate gitversion and gitdate values
>>> with the result of a git clone?
>>
>> git describe ?
>
> Thank you.
Wha
On 05/11/10 20:00 -0700, suvayu ali wrote:
>On 5 November 2010 18:53, Nick Urbanik wrote:
>> How do you determine the appropriate gitversion and gitdate values
>> with the result of a git clone?
>
>git describe ?
Thank you.
>Or do you mean something else?
No, I'm a git newby.
And gitdate is ju
On 5 November 2010 18:53, Nick Urbanik wrote:
> How do you determine the appropriate gitversion and gitdate values
> with the result of a git clone?
git describe ? Or do you mean something else?
PS: Please don't CC the old redhat address. It has been deprecated for
many months now.
--
Suvayu
Dear Team,
Inspired by Dave Witbrodt's success in getting free ATI drivers
working with his HD 5750 described here:
http://www.pubbs.net/201011/xorg/75-evergreen-accel-works-great-on-my-radeon-hd-5750.html
I am building some RPM packages to make my wife and son's iMac 27-inch
machin
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote, at 10/11/2010 12:48 AM +9:00:
> On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 15:22 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
>> On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 17:53 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Before (fedora 10), the list of the installed packages was available
>>> in /var/log/rpmpkgs.
>>> this dir
On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 15:22 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 17:53 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Before (fedora 10), the list of the installed packages was available
> > in /var/log/rpmpkgs.
> > this directory does not exists any more.
> > Where can I get the li
On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 17:53 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Before (fedora 10), the list of the installed packages was available
> in /var/log/rpmpkgs.
> this directory does not exists any more.
> Where can I get the list of installed packages ?
>
> Thank.
>
Thew simplest way is to run
On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 17:53 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Before (fedora 10), the list of the installed packages was available
> in /var/log/rpmpkgs.
> this directory does not exists any more.
> Where can I get the list of installed packages ?
>
> Thank.
>
> --
> ---
> ==
Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Before (fedora 10), the list of the installed packages was available
> in /var/log/rpmpkgs. this directory does not exists any more.
The /var/log/rpmpkgs file was created via a daily cron job. In order
to drop the dependency on cron, it was split out of the base rpm
packag
On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 17:53 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Where can I get the list of installed packages ?
rpm -qa
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://ad
Hello,
Before (fedora 10), the list of the installed packages was available
in /var/log/rpmpkgs.
this directory does not exists any more.
Where can I get the list of installed packages ?
Thank.
--
---
==
Patrick DUPRÉ
>
> sounds good.
>
tho i would think SA-Fedora12 would be more appropriate.
>
do not forget that there is DSL, Damn Small Linux.
>
Thanks,
yeah, you are right. let me talk about this with my team-mate (SA-Fedora12).
Thanks for remind me about DSL, but we have two different point of view,
DSL=Min
siavash ghiasvand wrote:
> By now, system can come up with just 95 packages and it seems that
> to reduce "Basic FC12" to "Minimal FC12" which we named it "SA-Linux"
> ;)
sounds good.
tho i would think SA-Fedora12 would be more appropriate.
do not forget that there is DSL, Damn Small Linux.
> i elected to wait a little while so i could ask following questions. :)
>
> how many are you down to now?
>
> when are you going to post a link to a list?
Dear geleem,
By now, system can coming up with just 95 packages and it seems that
nothing can be reduced any more. but I must prove that (9
siavash ghiasvand wrote:
> Thank you very much for your help, I will read them ASAP.
welcome very much.
i elected to wait a little while so i could ask following questions. :)
> P.S: after removign many packages, now, my current "minimal fedora",
> has less than 100 packages! ;)
how many are
> Fedora is not a minimalist distro. Therefore, you are looking at the
> wrong things.
>
> If you examine embedded systems, you won't find very many Fedora based
> verses, say debian.
>
> Cisco makes home market routers that have 8MB ROM to store the OS. Try
> that with Fedora sometime. :)
>
> Mu
On 07/14/2010 03:51 AM, siavash ghiasvand wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> For some reasons I want to know what are "Minimum Required RPM
> Packages" for installing fedora on a PC.
> At installation time, we can remove all optional packages and after
> removing them Fedora
> i went back to google to do another search with new parameters;
>
> yum rpm fedora "minimal+system"
>
> which found some possibles;
>
> a list removables; [yes, it is fc5, but list might catch any you have missed]
> http://colinux.wikia.com/wiki/Fedora5MinimalInstall071
>
>
> a kickstart file;
>
siavash ghiasvand wrote:
> For sure I've googled it carefully before sending this email.
ok. but still not a final intent for use. which makes your request more
intriguing.
after re-reading your post, being that you have eliminated obvious types of
server and still not mentioning final intent,
> rpmreaper is a nice little ripper & stripper I use for this
>
> ..dex
Thank you Dexter, I read the overview it would be nice.
Till now I used a lot of shell scripting to do some recursive
dependency removing. But it would be more easier now, with this little
app. Thanks ;)
--
users mailing list
On 15 July 2010 10:08, siavash ghiasvand wrote:
>> As I said, to determine your own minimum, start with a base install and
>> work down from there. Look at requires/depends with rpm, and run "yum
>> remove foo" (and answer "n" if you don't like what is going to be
>> removed).
>
rpmreaper is a n
> I have a headless machine that serves as a router, a web and mail server,
> and a firewall. I stripped it down as much as possible, while still leaving
> a usable system that can be upgraded normally.
>
> Right now, there are 458 rpm packages on it.
>
> There are no developm
> While I think I understand your criteria for a package being "essential" (in
> the sense that the system fails to boot if this package is not present), I am
> still confused. Booting the system is a process that takes several stages. At
> what point exactly do you consider that the system has fin
On 07/14/2010 07:02 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
On Thursday, July 15, 2010 00:03:28 siavash ghiasvand wrote:
I'm looking for a LIST of RPM packages which are sufficient to
bring up a simple kernel and nothing more.
I can erase files from an installed system and create a live disk from
On Thursday, July 15, 2010 00:03:28 siavash ghiasvand wrote:
> I'm looking for a LIST of RPM packages which are sufficient to
> bring up a simple kernel and nothing more.
>
> I can erase files from an installed system and create a live disk from
> them , even I can use someth
Once upon a time, Sam Varshavchik said:
> I have a headless machine that serves as a router, a web and mail server,
> and a firewall. I stripped it down as much as possible, while still leaving
> a usable system that can be upgraded normally.
>
> Right now, there are 458 rpm pac
4,470 hits;
g
Dear g,
For sure I've googled it carefully before sending this email. I saw
those links and none of them did the trick which I want, Cause I'm
looking for a LIST of RPM packages which are sufficient to bring up a
simple kernel and nothing more.
I have a headless machine tha
gt; g
Dear g,
For sure I've googled it carefully before sending this email. I saw
those links and none of them did the trick which I want, Cause I'm
looking for a LIST of RPM packages which are sufficient to bring up a
simple kernel and nothing more.
I can erase files from an instal
siavash ghiasvand wrote:
> For some reasons I want to know what are "Minimum Required RPM
> Packages" for installing fedora on a PC.
'For some reasons' is very broad and allows for a maximum possible reasons.
and, almost as many replies as you have received.
as h
> Okay, as I mentioned in my earlier post, for disk space requirements you
> can try febootstrap. it is available in the Fedora repositories.
> But this might not reduce your list of installed packages to something
> as small as you are looking for. Maybe you can try the method I outlined
> earlie
On Wednesday 14 July 2010 10:50 AM, siavash ghiasvand wrote:
>> > tell us_why_ you want this "extreme minimal" install
> The first reason is: "Minimal disk drive" and the second reason is:
> "Prevent any future conflict" which means, on that "extreme minimal
> linux" all packages can be installed
> I use this in rhel 5 right before I list the extra packages I want
> such as tar/openssh etc...
Thanks Joseph. It would be helpfull.
> I would make a minimal LiveCD from a kickstart file. Then boot a virtual
> machine with the iso. I would then try to remove what I consider "not
> required" a
On Wednesday 14 July 2010 09:38 AM, siavash ghiasvand wrote:
>> Everybody's list of "essential" packages is different. For example,
>> ...
>> remove and what is required by basic system packages).
>
>> There is no such description in all of fedora's documentation.
>> Also, your description of "unw
>Cause first I need to know what are those essential packages! after
>that, as you and other guys said I can use kickstart to picking up
>them.
I use this in rhel 5 right before I list the extra packages I want
such as tar/openssh etc...
%pre
#!/bin/bash
yum groupinfo base | perl -we 'my $in_mand
> Everybody's list of "essential" packages is different. For example,
> ...
> remove and what is required by basic system packages).
> There is no such description in all of fedora's documentation.
> Also, your description of "unwanted" is too vague and may well
> be ill defined.
Thanks chris a
On 07/14/2010 02:51 AM, siavash ghiasvand wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> For some reasons I want to know what are "Minimum Required RPM
> Packages" for installing fedora on a PC.
> At installation time, we can remove all optional packages and after
> removing them Fedora
Once upon a time, siavash ghiasvand said:
> Each package which is NOT essential for booting the system.
> Some of those important but not essential packages are:
> - passwd
> - openssh
> - sudo
> - dirmngr
> - file
> and many more...
Everybody's list of "essential" packages is different. For exa
On 07/14/2010 08:30 PM, siavash ghiasvand wrote:
>> You didn't answer why you can't use kickstart and pick your own set of
>> packages?
>>
>> Rahul
>>
> Cause first I need to know what are those essential packages! after
> that, as you and other guys said I can use kickstart to picking up
> th
> Hi,
> I have found a project called JeOS = "Just enough Operating System"
> that deals with similar issues.
> http://orangejeos.sourceforge.net/
> JB
Thank you very much, I read that project description and it looks
similar to mine. but for further reply I must spend some time there.
Siavash
-
> You didn't answer why you can't use kickstart and pick your own set of
> packages?
>
> Rahul
Cause first I need to know what are those essential packages! after
that, as you and other guys said I can use kickstart to picking up
them.
BTW, thanks for your attention And if you have any idea about
siavash ghiasvand gmail.com> writes:
> 1- What are Minimum Required RPM Packages for installing Fedora? (just
> booting up the system with kernel and then, a simple command line
> access)
> 2- How can I reach this minimal system? (As I described above those
> dependencies mak
On 07/14/2010 08:18 PM, siavash ghiasvand wrote:
>> Be specific. Which packages? Why can't you use kickstart?
>>
>> Rahul
>>
> Each package which is NOT essential for booting the system.
> Some of those important but not essential packages are:
> - passwd
> - openssh
> - sudo
> - dirmngr
> -
> Be specific. Which packages? Why can't you use kickstart?
>
> Rahul
Each package which is NOT essential for booting the system.
Some of those important but not essential packages are:
- passwd
- openssh
- sudo
- dirmngr
- file
and many more...
These packages are very important but they are no
On 07/14/2010 05:32 PM, siavash ghiasvand wrote:
> Dear JB
>
>
>> have you looked into
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraLiveCD/LiveCDHowTo
>> Why not create that barebone live cd and see what good, bad, and ugly went
>> into
>> it ?
>>
> Thanks, I will take a look at it now, may be
Dear JB
> have you looked into
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraLiveCD/LiveCDHowTo
> Why not create that barebone live cd and see what good, bad, and ugly went
> into
> it ?
Thanks, I will take a look at it now, may be it could help me.
But you know, the problem is Official Fedora Release
siavash ghiasvand gmail.com> writes:
>
> 1- What are Minimum Required RPM Packages for installing Fedora? (just
> booting up the system with kernel and then, a simple command line
> access)
Hi,
have you looked into
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraLiveCD/LiveCDHowTo
parag
Dear Chris
> Did you try a kickstart install with '%packages --nobase'? This gets you
> 189 packages (at least in rawhide).
Yes, I've tried it but unfortunately many unwanted packages like
"wireless" will be installed with this option.
Thanks for that link, I will check it out.
Dear JB
> S
know what are "Minimum Required RPM
Packages" for installing fedora on a PC.
At installation time, we can remove all optional packages and after
removing them Fedora will install with nearly 200 packages! But, many
of these packages are not necessary, for example OpenSSH, WireLess,
etc.
T
siavash ghiasvand gmail.com> writes:
>
> Dear All,
>
> For some reasons I want to know what are "Minimum Required RPM
> Packages" for installing fedora on a PC.
Hi,
Search Google for: fedora minimal installation kickstart
The first hit
http://fedoraproject.org/w
Hi,
On 07/14/2010 11:51 AM, siavash ghiasvand wrote:
> 2- How can I reach this minimal system? (As I described above those
> dependencies make it impossible to remove unwanted packages after
> installation and also there is no option to remove unwanted packages
> before installation)
Did you try
Dear All,
For some reasons I want to know what are "Minimum Required RPM
Packages" for installing fedora on a PC.
At installation time, we can remove all optional packages and after
removing them Fedora will install with nearly 200 packages! But, many
of these packages are not nece
61 matches
Mail list logo
