Re: reporting on BZ for texlive-IEEEtran

2016-03-21 Thread Ranjan Maitra
On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:59:36 -0400 Tom Horsley wrote: > On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 08:47:22 -0500 > Ranjan Maitra wrote: > > > However, it appears that on BZ there is no entry to list it under. > > It isn't documented anywhere, but the redhat bugzilla categories > all correspond to whatever source RPM

Re: reporting on BZ for texlive-IEEEtran

2016-03-21 Thread Tom Horsley
On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 08:47:22 -0500 Ranjan Maitra wrote: > However, it appears that on BZ there is no entry to list it under. It isn't documented anywhere, but the redhat bugzilla categories all correspond to whatever source RPM originated the file in question. So, for example: tomh> rpm -q -i -

reporting on BZ for texlive-IEEEtran

2016-03-21 Thread Ranjan Maitra
Hi, I wanted to report on Bugzilla that the IEEEtran style file was quite outdated and needed an update. However, it appears that on BZ there is no entry to list it under. The only choices I get there are: texlive-extension, texlive-texmf and texlive-texmf-errata and texlive itself. It is in th