Re: problem with Dependency Resolution

I installed dconf-editor-0.18.0-2.fc20.x86_64.rpm !!! All was good . You had very much patience wit me Thank you very much [?] Regards Angelo On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 12:11 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 23:45:14 +0300, Angelo Moreschini wrote: > > > No matter what is the

Re: problem with Dependency Resolution

On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 23:45:14 +0300, Angelo Moreschini wrote: > No matter what is the file to install... > *This is a problem of dependencies.* ??? > I found the file that can be good: dconf-editor-0.18.0-2.fc20.x86_64.rpm yum install dconf-editor -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraprojec

Re: problem with Dependency Resolution

Hi Michel No matter what is the file to install... *This is a problem of dependencies.* I found the file that can be good: dconf-editor-0.18.0-2.fc20.x86_64.rpm So: as the old file (dconf-editor-0.15.0-4mgc30.x86_64.rmp) was not installed... I think that now I can try to install the new one:

Re: problem with Dependency Resolution

On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:19:34 +0300, Angelo Moreschini wrote: > dconf-Edit don't is installed because the environment (the dependencies) is > older than he wont. It is the opposite. The package you want to install is _older_ than what is included with Fedora 20. Watch this: $ rpmdev-vercmp 0.

Re: problem with Dependency Resolution

Hi Michael, at the begin I thank you for your patience... I don't understand always well all of what you say. This because I am new in this environment. Now you put the focus on side of the problem that I think to understand: dconf-Edit don't is installed because the environment (the depende

Re: problem with Dependency Resolution

On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 14:22:49 +0300, Angelo Moreschini wrote: > >No, I refer to your 3rd message in this thread, where you wrote: > > OK you wont know what happened when I installed the new dconf-Editor > This is the complete output that I got then : Sigh. Slow down, please. Read the repl

Re: problem with Dependency Resolution

>No, I refer to your 3rd message in this thread, where you wrote: OK you wont know what happened when I installed the new dconf-Editor This is the complete output that I got then : -- [angelo_dev@zorro Downloads]$ sudo yum install dconf-editor-0.15.0-4mgc30.x86

Re: problem with Dependency Resolution

On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 10:23:03 +0300, Angelo Moreschini wrote: > I installed fedora 20 not long ago, and now I'm customizing the > installation by adding programs not included by default in the installation. Just don't download programs from arbitrary web sites. Prefer sticking to official package

Re: problem with Dependency Resolution

Hi Michel, > The problem is that nobody on this list does _know_ what exactly you've > done since you only mentioned troubles installing the _old_ dconf-editor > version you had downloaded somewhere. I installed fedora 20 not long ago, and now I'm customizing the installation by adding programs

Re: problem with Dependency Resolution

On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 19:49:12 +0300, Angelo Moreschini wrote: > I didn't force the installation of the old dconf-Edit .. , the installation > was pretty smooth.. The problem is that nobody on this list does _know_ what exactly you've done since you only mentioned troubles installing the _old_ dcon

Re: problem with Dependency Resolution

Hi Michael, Usually you cannot simply break any package dependencies > and replace a strictly required API with something incompatible. > I think the same that you say.., but . I didn't force the installation of the old dconf-Edit .. , the installation was pretty smooth.. I uninstalled th

Re: problem with Dependency Resolution

On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 17:41:48 +0300, Angelo Moreschini wrote: > Doing this mistake I have now on my computer some old API(s) that don't > allow me to install the new package. How so? It sounds more like you are confused by something. Usually you cannot simply break any package dependencies and re

Re: problem with Dependency Resolution

Hi, I think to have, now, a right sight of the problem... I installed an old version of dconf-Editor. I did this because I didn't control the link that suggested me where take the package. Doing this mistake I have now on my computer some old API(s) that don't allow me to install the new package

Re: problem with Dependency Resolution

On 14 Oct 2014 08:53, "Ed Greshko" wrote: > > The question would be Do you want the standard Fedora released version or that older version you got from someplace else? And if you want the older version of dconf-editor that you got from someplace else, they you need to replace the Fedora dcon

Re: problem with Dependency Resolution

On 10/14/14 15:43, Angelo Moreschini wrote: > To do the first installation of dconf-Edit I used the command : > sudo yum install dconf-editor > > I think this command is for getting packages directly from repositories > > --- > When I did the first installation I didn't know many things ab

Re: problem with Dependency Resolution

perhaps you are right .. To do the first installation of dconf-Edit I used the command : sudo yum install dconf-editor I think this command is for getting packages directly from repositories --- When I did the first installation I didn't know many things about dconf... I only looked a w

Re: problem with Dependency Resolution

On 10/14/14 13:46, Angelo Moreschini wrote: > > Hi > > I removed a preceding version of dconf-Editor, and now I am not able to > istall again dconf-editor-0.15.0-4mgc30.x86_64.rpm. > > When I try to do it I get this output: From where are you getting dconf-editor-0.15.0-4mgc30?? It doesn't appear

problem with Dependency Resolution

Hi I removed a preceding version of dconf-Editor, and now I am not able to istall again dconf-editor-0.15.0-4mgc30.x86_64.rpm. When I try to do it I get this output: [root@zorro Downloads]# su -c 'yum localinstall dconf-editor-0.15.0-4mgc30.x86_64.rpm' Loaded plugins: