Re: [SPF:fail] Re: possible bad ipv6 mirror [partial solution]

2010-01-16 Thread Ed Greshko
Tim wrote: > On Sat, 2010-01-16 at 16:49 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > >> My ISP is a pure IPv4 ISP. My ADSL modem doesn't know a thing about >> IPv6. Yet >> >> [egres...@f12 ~]$ ping6 2001:4860:c004::68 >> > > I haven't done anything more than a quick check recently, but my ISP > *didn'

Re: [SPF:fail] Re: possible bad ipv6 mirror [partial solution]

2010-01-16 Thread Tim
On Sat, 2010-01-16 at 16:49 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > My ISP is a pure IPv4 ISP. My ADSL modem doesn't know a thing about > IPv6. Yet > > [egres...@f12 ~]$ ping6 2001:4860:c004::68 I haven't done anything more than a quick check recently, but my ISP *didn't* support IPv6, hasn't made any a

Re: [SPF:fail] Re: possible bad ipv6 mirror [partial solution]

2010-01-16 Thread Ed Greshko
Tim wrote: > Tim: > >>> On an IPv4-only ISP, any IPv6-only resources will not be available to >>> you, and doing your own IPv6-IPv4 substitution behind a IPv4-only >>> network is pointless. >>> > > Ed Greshko: > >> Can you expound on that last paragraph? Or, at least the first half >>

Re: [SPF:fail] Re: possible bad ipv6 mirror [partial solution]

2010-01-16 Thread Tim
Tim: >> On an IPv4-only ISP, any IPv6-only resources will not be available to >> you, and doing your own IPv6-IPv4 substitution behind a IPv4-only >> network is pointless. Ed Greshko: > Can you expound on that last paragraph? Or, at least the first half > of the last paragraph. While my ISP is a

Re: [SPF:fail] Re: possible bad ipv6 mirror [partial solution]

2010-01-15 Thread Ed Greshko
Tim wrote: > On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 09:59 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > >> Stop suggesting to everyone to disable IPv6. >> > > There really isn't a great point in having it enabled when your ISP and > your ADSL modem/router doesn't support it. I'm not aware of *any* > domestic network

Re: possible bad ipv6 mirror [partial solution]

2010-01-15 Thread Tim
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 09:59 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Stop suggesting to everyone to disable IPv6. There really isn't a great point in having it enabled when your ISP and your ADSL modem/router doesn't support it. I'm not aware of *any* domestic networking equipment that supports it in

Re: possible bad ipv6 mirror [partial solution]

2010-01-15 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Jim on 01/15/2010 08:55 AM wrote: > Have you done anything to disable IPV6 in /etc and Firefox ? Jim, Please. Pretty please. Pretty please with sugar on top. Stop suggesting to everyone to disable IPv6. Thanks, Michael -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https:/

Re: possible bad ipv6 mirror [partial solution]

2010-01-15 Thread Jim
On 01/14/2010 11:40 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: On 01/14/2010 06:20 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: It's tiresome that yum does not detect bad URLs. Added mirror.switch.ch to point to ::1 to my hosts. Yum is now using [2001:400:201:6::35] to pull updates. Working great. Hmm Have

Re: possible bad ipv6 mirror [partial solution]

2010-01-14 Thread Michael Cronenworth
On 01/14/2010 11:12 PM, Matt Domsch wrote: Is it possible that there's some IPv6 breakage between you and that site? It's not a connectivity problem, as I can access the site just fine through a browser, but a yum problem. Yum connects to mirror.switch.ch and proceeds to sleep eternally

Re: possible bad ipv6 mirror [partial solution]

2010-01-14 Thread Matt Domsch
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 10:40:23PM -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote: There was a question about if IPv6 GeoIP in MirrorManager was working. Yes, it is. >On 01/14/2010 06:20 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > > It's tiresome that yum does not detect bad URLs. ?? Please advise exactly what U

Re: possible bad ipv6 mirror [partial solution]

2010-01-14 Thread Michael Cronenworth
On 01/14/2010 06:20 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: It's tiresome that yum does not detect bad URLs. Added mirror.switch.ch to point to ::1 to my hosts. Yum is now using [2001:400:201:6::35] to pull updates. Working great. Hmm -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To un

Re: possible bad ipv6 mirror

2010-01-14 Thread Michael Cronenworth
On 01/14/2010 08:05 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > usehttp://[2001:620:0:8::20]/ as the URL > *doh* Yes, forgotten brackets. It's been a while since I needed to use a whole IP. I can see the site now. .ch?? I'm in the USofA. Is GeoIP for IPv6 broken still? As Wolfgang noted, I see yum hang f

Re: possible bad ipv6 mirror

2010-01-14 Thread Wolfgang S. Rupprecht
Chris Adams writes: > Once upon a time, Michael Cronenworth said: >> IP: 2001:620:0:8::20 >> >> yum has been attempting repeatedly to use this IP for updates. It >> responds to pings, but not to HTTP requests. telnet IP 80 or firefox >> does not get a webpage. > > Works for me (both HTTP and

Re: possible bad ipv6 mirror

2010-01-14 Thread Ed Greshko
Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Michael Cronenworth said: > >> IP: 2001:620:0:8::20 >> >> yum has been attempting repeatedly to use this IP for updates. It >> responds to pings, but not to HTTP requests. telnet IP 80 or firefox >> does not get a webpage. >> > > Works for me (both

Re: possible bad ipv6 mirror

2010-01-14 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Michael Cronenworth said: > IP: 2001:620:0:8::20 > > yum has been attempting repeatedly to use this IP for updates. It > responds to pings, but not to HTTP requests. telnet IP 80 or firefox > does not get a webpage. Works for me (both HTTP and FTP), although neither Firefox n

possible bad ipv6 mirror

2010-01-14 Thread Michael Cronenworth
IP: 2001:620:0:8::20 yum has been attempting repeatedly to use this IP for updates. It responds to pings, but not to HTTP requests. telnet IP 80 or firefox does not get a webpage. Can anyone else try this IP for me? It's tiresome that yum does not detect bad URLs. Thanks, Michael -- users ma