Hello,
I am not sure that it is the right list to post this, but please let me know.
Under openoffice (fedora 19). when I try to create an equation (by using
ooolatex [4.1.1.2]),
I get an error:
BASIC runtime error.
Property or method not found: getDocumentInfo.
In the macro (OOolatexTools
On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 13:35 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> It probably already has:
> http://people.gnome.org/~michael/blog/2012-04-26-ooo-comparison.html
"Sadly, most end-users care remarkably little about licenses - clicking
through them without even reading; that is something we should try to
f
On 05/19/2012 09:50 AM, Greg Woods wrote:
So it will not be too long before LibreOffice
leaves OpenOffice behind IMHO.
It probably already has:
http://people.gnome.org/~michael/blog/2012-04-26-ooo-comparison.html
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change
On 05/19/2012 11:00 PM, Edward M wrote:
> On 05/19/2012 09:50 AM, Greg Woods wrote:
>> but since Apache projects cannot use GPL-licensed code, the
>> reverse is not true. So it will not be too long before LibreOffice
>> leaves OpenOffice behind IMHO.
>
> I th
On 05/19/2012 10:30 AM, Edward M wrote:
On 05/19/2012 09:50 AM, Greg Woods wrote:
but since Apache projects cannot use GPL-licensed code, the
reverse is not true. So it will not be too long before LibreOffice
leaves OpenOffice behind IMHO.
I thought Apache license 2 was compatible with
On 05/19/2012 09:50 AM, Greg Woods wrote:
but since Apache projects cannot use GPL-licensed code, the
reverse is not true. So it will not be too long before LibreOffice
leaves OpenOffice behind IMHO.
I thought Apache license 2 was compatible with GPLv3. According
to wikipedia
On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 22:17 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 18/05/12 20:32, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> >> Alan Cox wrote:
> >> OpenOffice then got given to Apache in
> >> what a lot of people consider a face saving exercise.
> >
> > I guess what puzzles me
On 18/05/12 20:32, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Alan Cox wrote:
OpenOffice then got given to Apache in
what a lot of people consider a face saving exercise.
I guess what puzzles me is why Apache took it.
Does it have a different model in mind?
Maybe Microsoft told them to?
--
Regards,
Frank
Alan Cox wrote:
> Openoffice was run under a very restrictive policy and many of the
> developers forked it. Most folk switched to Libreoffice which has been
> rapidly evolving since the split. OpenOffice then got given to Apache in
> what a lot of people consider a face saving exerci
On Fri, 18 May 2012 18:30:59 +0200
Timothy Murphy wrote:
> What is the exact relation between these two?
Openoffice was run under a very restrictive policy and many of the
developers forked it. Most folk switched to Libreoffice which has been
rapidly evolving since the split. OpenOffice t
On 05/18/2012 10:30 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
What is the exact relation between these two?
Are they likely to merge?
How do they differ?
They are both free.:-) :-)
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.or
What is the exact relation between these two?
Are they likely to merge?
How do they differ?
--
Timothy Murphy
e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net
tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366
s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College Dublin
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To un
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 22:42 -0500, Gene Smith wrote:
> I have had a problem with libreoffice properly rendering graphics in
> documents (vertical and hoizontal lines do not display). Never had this
> problem with OO.org in <=f14. Therefore I removed libreoffice and
> installed OO from rpms from
Am 16.12.2011 06:03, schrieb Gene Smith:
>
> Added:
> exclude=libreoffice*
>
> fixed it. Thank!
> However, this seems to point to some kind of packaging problem...?
no, libreoffice is intentet to replace openoffice in fedora and
so it has provides/obsoletes to make as ex
On 12/15/2011 10:46 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 16.12.2011 04:42, schrieb Gene Smith:
Therefore, I need to go back to just OO.org. Is there a way to cause f16 to not
try
to update libreoffice-ure when libreO is removed and replaced with OO?
[root@buildserver:~]$ cat /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora.r
On 12/15/2011 10:49 PM, Craig White wrote:
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 22:42 -0500, Gene Smith wrote:
I have had a problem with libreoffice properly rendering graphics in
documents (vertical and hoizontal lines do not display). Never had this
problem with OO.org in<=f14. Therefore I removed libreoffic
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 22:42 -0500, Gene Smith wrote:
> I have had a problem with libreoffice properly rendering graphics in
> documents (vertical and hoizontal lines do not display). Never had this
> problem with OO.org in <=f14. Therefore I removed libreoffice and
> installed OO from rpms from
Am 16.12.2011 04:42, schrieb Gene Smith:
> Therefore, I need to go back to just OO.org. Is there a way to cause f16 to
> not try
> to update libreoffice-ure when libreO is removed and replaced with OO?
[root@buildserver:~]$ cat /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora.repo
[fedora]
name=Fedora $releasever - $ba
I have had a problem with libreoffice properly rendering graphics in
documents (vertical and hoizontal lines do not display). Never had this
problem with OO.org in <=f14. Therefore I removed libreoffice and
installed OO from rpms from OO.org site. I am now able to read the
documents OK.
Howev
On 07/05/2011 06:26 PM, Maurizio Marini wrote:
> As far as i have understood, in f15 there no openoffice and there is
> libreoffice in place
> i am planning to upgrade f14 to f15, is it better uninstalling
> openoffice and let preupgrade to install libreoffice? or si better let him
2011/7/5 Maurizio Marini :
> As far as i have understood, in f15 there no openoffice and there is
> libreoffice in place
> i am planning to upgrade f14 to f15, is it better uninstalling
> openoffice and let preupgrade to install libreoffice? or si better let him to
> do t
As far as i have understood, in f15 there no openoffice and there is
libreoffice in place
i am planning to upgrade f14 to f15, is it better uninstalling
openoffice and let preupgrade to install libreoffice? or si better let him to
do the work?
-m.
--
users mailing list
users
contends that the pace of development for LibreOffice is
not keeping up with what OpenOffice was able to achieve and wonders if
OpenOffice would have been better off if the "factionalists" hadn't
won. "
I´m sure Shuttleworth has a lot more "credibility" and inside
knowle
er and required from you.
[And please do work your story better; either Mr Meeks and his ghastly
Novell troops are puny and insignificant – and unable to develop any
software in a reasonable way OR they are so TERRIBLY COMPETENT, that even a
huge corporation like Oracle was not able to compete wit
Shuttleworth has a fairly serious disagreement with how the
OpenOffice.org/LibreOffice split came about. He said that Sun made a
$100 million "gift" to the community when it opened up the OpenOffice
code. But a "radical faction" made the lives of the OpenOffice
developers "hell
t; to indicate
> that Apache is in favor of this, and I'm sure Oracle didn't
> just "toss
> this over the wall" without checking to see if Apache was
> receptive to
> accepting the project.
>
> http://www.networkworld.com/community/apache-president-ji
rifying that. The link below seems to indicate
that Apache is in favor of this, and I'm sure Oracle didn't just "toss
this over the wall" without checking to see if Apache was receptive to
accepting the project.
http://www.networkworld.com/community/apache-president-jim-jagie
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 13:05:47 -0400,
Bill Davidsen wrote:
> It seems that the future of OO is not so bleak as was originally
> thought. OO is now handed to Apache, with the support of Oracle and IBM,
> as well as others.
>
> http://www.networkworld.com/news/2011/060211-faq-whats-the-future
It seems that the future of OO is not so bleak as was originally
thought. OO is now handed to Apache, with the support of Oracle and IBM,
as well as others.
http://www.networkworld.com/news/2011/060211-faq-whats-the-future-of.html?source=NWWNLE_nlt_daily_am_2011-06-03
--
Bill Davidsen
We a
> Second: I fully understand why OpenOffice was dropped in favour of
> LibreOffice. I will (probably) change in the future. However, at work we
> use OpenOffice, and I would like to learn Gnome3 first, before battling
> with a new office suite - and possible compatibility issues.
>
d: I fully understand why OpenOffice was dropped in favour of
LibreOffice. I will (probably) change in the future. However, at work we
use OpenOffice, and I would like to learn Gnome3 first, before battling
with a new office suite - and possible compatibility issues.
I installed F15 on my netb
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Sounds as though the need for LibreOffice is about over,
There was never a "need" for LibreOffice. Only competing companies
wishing to wrest control of the project away from Oracle, like Novell
wanted to do for a long time to take control aw
On Sun, 17 Apr 2011 20:10:06 -0400
Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Sounds as though the need for LibreOffice is about over, we don't need two
> project if Oracle is serious about having letting OO go. The people at LO are
> mostly former OO developers, so hopefully the projects could be unified.
Yes th
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Sounds as though the need for LibreOffice is about over, we don't need two
Or, perhaps it's now clear to Oracle that the need for OOo is over.
We've heard these promises from Oracle before, frankly I think the
Document Foundation is in a mu
On 18/04/11 10:48, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I keep up with Ars Tecnica, Slashdot etc. but have seen nothing about
> this. Some kind of reference would be useful.
One article:
http://www.itnews.com.au/News/254803,oracle-hangs-up-the-gloves-on-openoffice.aspx
--
users mailing list
users@lists
On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 20:10 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Sounds as though the need for LibreOffice is about over, we don't need
> two project if Oracle is serious about having letting OO go.
I keep up with Ars Tecnica, Slashdot etc. but have seen nothing about
this. Some kind of reference would b
Sounds as though the need for LibreOffice is about over, we don't need two
project if Oracle is serious about having letting OO go. The people at LO are
mostly former OO developers, so hopefully the projects could be unified.
FOSS is like archery, it's good to have all the wood behind the arrowh
a lot of size to the original PDF file.
>
> I use it for filling out forms in PDF format that don't have embedded
> form fields all the time.
>
> But back to the original topic ... I have found both OpenOffice and
> Inkscape PDF import to be non-reliable. It seems that the
at don't have embedded
form fields all the time.
But back to the original topic ... I have found both OpenOffice and
Inkscape PDF import to be non-reliable. It seems that there are some
formats of PDF that make them both fail miserably. But hopefully the
import effectiveness improves ove
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 2:36 PM, JD wrote:
> Well, it turns out there indeed is bad news.
> Xournal does not or cannot save the edited
> pdf file in pdf format. It saves it in it's own
> format - with .xoj extension.
That is incorrect. You need to export to pdf.
--
Suvayu
Open source is the f
On 04/16/2011 02:32 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 07:20 -0700, JD wrote:
>>> Any other pdf editors available that are quick and work?
>>> Well there is good news and bad news. The program xournal can edit
>> pdf
>>> files. But the bad news is that xournal is needed to read the fi
On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 07:20 -0700, JD wrote:
> > Any other pdf editors available that are quick and work?
> > Well there is good news and bad news. The program xournal can edit
> pdf
> > files. But the bad news is that xournal is needed to read the file.
> Huh???
> Sorry, I feel rather slow this mo
On 04/16/2011 06:33 AM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 18:33 -0700, JD wrote:
>> Found this on the web at http://www.linux.com/archive/feature/139588
>> OpenOffice.org extension will add PDF editing
>> By Bruce Byfield on July 03, 2008 (7:00:00 PM)
>>
>> I tried to edit a PDF file, an
On 04/16/2011 06:33 AM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 18:33 -0700, JD wrote:
>> Found this on the web at http://www.linux.com/archive/feature/139588
>> OpenOffice.org extension will add PDF editing
>> By Bruce Byfield on July 03, 2008 (7:00:00 PM)
>>
>> I tried to edit a PDF file, an
On 4/16/11, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 18:33 -0700, JD wrote:
>> Any other pdf editors available that are quick and work?
>
> Well there is good news and bad news. The program xournal can edit pdf
> files. But the bad news is that xournal is needed to read the file.
You can exp
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 18:33 -0700, JD wrote:
> Found this on the web at http://www.linux.com/archive/feature/139588
> OpenOffice.org extension will add PDF editing
> By Bruce Byfield on July 03, 2008 (7:00:00 PM)
>
> I tried to edit a PDF file, and I have
> to report that, on my unicore athlon 64,
Found this on the web at http://www.linux.com/archive/feature/139588
OpenOffice.org extension will add PDF editing
By Bruce Byfield on July 03, 2008 (7:00:00 PM)
I tried to edit a PDF file, and I have
to report that, on my unicore athlon 64, 2GB ram,
it is so painfully slow to edit a PDF file that
Hi,
I tryed the "share document" on OpenOffice (tools | share document)
to edit the same document from more than 1 user. It works under
Windows and under Ubuntu but dont work under fedora... is there
something I dont know ?
OOo under ubuntu is 3.2 and under fedora 3.3
thanks for any ki
yum install openoffice.org-base openoffice.org-core openoffice-calc
openoffice-write --exclude=openoffice.org-langpack-*
yum install openoffice.org-langpack-**
or your installation will be incomplete.
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 04:51, Martin Airs wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 Mar 2011 11:40:29 Mike Wri
How about:
yum groupinstall Office
This should install a basic set of packages for Open Office.
On 3/8/11 2:40 PM, "Mike Wright" wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>Using f14.x64
>
>I'm trying to install a basic openoffice package with calc and whatever
>reads .pps fil
On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 11:40 -0800, Mike Wright wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Using f14.x64
>
> I'm trying to install a basic openoffice package with calc and whatever
> reads .pps files.
>
> yum install openoffice.org* gives me this:
>
> Install 332 Package
On Tuesday 08 Mar 2011 11:40:29 Mike Wright wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Using f14.x64
>
> I'm trying to install a basic openoffice package with calc and whatever
> reads .pps files.
>
> yum install openoffice.org* gives me this:
>
> Install 332 Package
Mike Wright mailinator.com> writes:
> ...
$ yum grouplist hidden |grep -i office
Office/Productivity
OpenOffice.org Development
$ yum groupinfo Office/Productivity
# yum groupinstall Office/Productivity
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscr
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Mike Wright wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Using f14.x64
>
> I'm trying to install a basic openoffice package with calc and whatever
> reads .pps files.
>
> yum install openoffice.org* gives me this:
You told it to install everything starting wi
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Mike Wright wrote:
> I'm trying to install a basic openoffice package with calc and whatever
> reads .pps files.
>
> yum install openoffice.org* gives me this:
>
> Install 332 Package(s)
>
> Total download size: 874 M
> Install
Hi all,
Using f14.x64
I'm trying to install a basic openoffice package with calc and whatever
reads .pps files.
yum install openoffice.org* gives me this:
Install 332 Package(s)
Total download size: 874 M
Installed size: 2.3 G
Is this ok [y/N]: N
Is this for real? I don't hav
On 30/01/2011 05:32 μμ, JB wrote:
> Now, make a note somewhere.
>
> If you suddenly experience a problem with OO Writer again, do the
> following to debug it:
$ strace openoffice.org -writer or to capture the debugging output to a
file
$ strace -o strace.oo-writer.debug openoffice.org -writer
Kostas Sfakiotakis cha.forthnet.gr> writes:
> ...
> > Does it work ?
>
> All the way , nice and smoothly as it was designed to do .
OK.
> The sidenote here would be that it asks me whether i want to keep the
> same format or
> change it to the odt format but that´s not what u were asking .
On 30/01/2011 05:04 μμ, JB wrote:
> Kostas Sfakiotakis cha.forthnet.gr> writes:
> Let me go back, as promised, to this problem.
> > In any way i try to run it . For example if i download a document
> > through firefox and then ask it to open the file then Writer will
> > crash .
>
> Can you ex
Kostas Sfakiotakis cha.forthnet.gr> writes:
>
> On 30/01/2011 12:37 μμ, JB wrote:
>
> # yum distro-sync
> ...
It has done what is supposed to do and the result is a good sign.
Let me go back, as promised, to this problem.
> In any way i try to run it . For example if i download a document
>
On 30/01/2011 12:37 μμ, JB wrote:
# yum distro-sync
Well i used this command twice , the first time i just exited X Windows
and issued the command on runlevel 3 and then i rebooted the computer
and run the command for a second time . All that happened was
Jan 30 16:28:36 Updated: kdebase-workspa
On 30/01/2011 12:37 μμ, JB wrote:
> This is OK. Btw, I am in GNOME desktop, but I see you can find things
> I asked for in KDE.
Well , you pointed the way , beyond that there was only one place to go ,
so i didn´t actually discovered the New World . Well the fact that you
are using Gnome would
Kostas Sfakiotakis cha.forthnet.gr> writes:
> ...
> > Tell us how you start your OO Writer when you get the error ?
>
> In any way i try to run it . For example if i download a document through
> firefox and then ask it to open the file then Writer will crash .
Leave this case for later.
>
On 30/01/2011 01:29 πμ, JB wrote:
< snip >
> Now with regard to OpenOffice. I would suggest that you reinstall
> Writer: # yum reinstall openoffice.org-writer
>
> If that does not help, reinstall all your OO packages: # yum
> reinstall openoffice.org-*
>
> Te
Kostas Sfakiotakis cha.forthnet.gr> writes:
>
> On 29/01/2011 11:04 μμ, JB wrote:
> > Kostas Sfakiotakis cha.forthnet.gr> writes:
> >
> > >
> > > Greetings ,
> > >
> > > Lately i have been having a lot of issues running the Word
On 29/01/2011 11:04 μμ, JB wrote:
> Kostas Sfakiotakis cha.forthnet.gr> writes:
>
> >
> > Greetings ,
> >
> > Lately i have been having a lot of issues running the Word
> > Processor of OpenOffice . It just seem to crash a bit after i try
> >
On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 22:00 +0200, Kostas Sfakiotakis wrote:
> Greetings ,
>
> Lately i have been having a lot of issues running the Word Processor of
> OpenOffice .
...
Here is a comparison of what you have and what I have. Obviously there
are some options...
the leftmost items a
Kostas Sfakiotakis cha.forthnet.gr> writes:
>
> Greetings ,
>
> Lately i have been having a lot of issues running the Word Processor of
> OpenOffice .
> It just seem to crash a bit after i try to execute it without a message
> or something .
> ...
try this first (
Greetings ,
Lately i have been having a lot of issues running the Word Processor of
OpenOffice .
It just seem to crash a bit after i try to execute it without a message
or something .
Anybody knows what might be going wrong here :
openoffice.org-ooolatex-4.0.0-0.8.beta2.fc14.1.x86_64
I have the Compiz and the Emerald Theme (and Ciaro dock) and my OpenOffice is
now working fine (since I deleted that tmp file).
William
- Original Message -
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Aaron Konstam < akons...@sbcglobal.net > wrote:
I am not sure what you are doing bu
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
>
> I am not sure what you are doing but I am running compiz and Open office
> components open for me.
>
Hmmm. Since that's the case, then it's not compiz per se that's the issue,
then. I wonder if it's the Emerald theme or one of the compiz
pl
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 11:15 -0500, William Henry wrote:
> My OO just doesn't start any more on F14. I have compiz and it's not
> crashing but my OO won't launch. I noticed this just before the
> Christmas break.
>
> William
>
>
> _
I also recognized problems with compiz. When i try to watch flash videos
via streaming in firefox, then the picture doesn´t move, when i toggle
full screen. But still the videos is running, cause i can hear the
sound. Whenn i switch back to normal screen, the picture begins to move
again and ev
Hi Harish,
Yes this worked thanks!
William
- Original Message -
> William -
>
> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 12:15 AM, William Henry
> wrote:
> > My OO just doesn't start any more on F14. I have compiz and it's not
> > crashing but my OO won't launch. I noticed this just before the
> > Chri
ssue is, atleast in my case, a residual file in /tmp that has the
>> following
>> initial letters: OSL_PIPE followed by a series of numbers. Deleting that
>> file
>> then allowed for oo.o to start properly.
>
> This is not my issue. The problem is when I enter compiz. T
series of numbers. Deleting that
> file
> then allowed for oo.o to start properly.
>
This is not my issue. The problem is when I enter compiz. Then when I try to
open any openoffice application, X-Windows freezes.
Kirk
--
$DO || ! $DO ; try
try: command not found
--
users mailing list
William -
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 12:15 AM, William Henry wrote:
> My OO just doesn't start any more on F14. I have compiz and it's not
> crashing but my OO won't launch. I noticed this just before the Christmas
> break.
I've had a similar issue. I've filed in BZ -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sho
My OO just doesn't start any more on F14. I have compiz and it's not crashing
but my OO won't launch. I noticed this just before the Christmas break.
William
- Original Message -
The subject line pretty well summarizes it. I've got a vanilla Fedora 14 box,
with the default theme and
A stacktrace would probably give more indication whats going on.
- Clemens
2010/12/21 Kirk Lowery :
> The subject line pretty well summarizes it. I've got a vanilla Fedora 14
> box, with the default theme and compiz enabled. Compiz works fine until I
> try to do *anything* with Oo.o. Then it cras
The subject line pretty well summarizes it. I've got a vanilla Fedora 14
box, with the default theme and compiz enabled. Compiz works fine until I
try to do *anything* with Oo.o. Then it crashes.
I've googled around and apparently Oo.o has had issues with gnome gtk and
compiz, but I was unable to
Hi,
OpenOffice impress slideshows aren't working for me in F13. If I try
to run a slideshow it fails to run fullscreen and instead opens a
root-sized window which, if I'm lucky centres on the screen. (If
unlucky it sits at the bottom of the screen and has to be dragged up.)
The window
In F14, x86_64 install, I try to send a document as email from
openoffice via evolution and I get the following error:
(evolution:11890): Tracker-CRITICAL **: D-Bus service
name:'org.freedesktop.Tracker1.Miner.Emails' is already taken, perhaps
the application is already running?
(evolu
JD wrote:
> I found that current release of libreoffice is same as
> openoffice.
OpenOffice is at version 3.3 in F13, while LibreOffice is only at 2.96 in
Rawhide.
Are you sure they are the same?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscr
g about suites is a different story, here at México we have a
popular motto,
it says:
"De dos No haces una"
It means "Of two, you don't make one" the deep meaning is about Two half
solutions
not being one, and I believe this is one of the problems in office suites
for Linu
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Manuel Escudero wrote:
> We have many many "Office Projects" at Linux, Even separate programs as
> Abiword and so on...
> I believe it would be better if all of them join to create a Powerfull
> OpenSource Alternative to MS Office Don't you?
No, I like my freedom
2010/10/18 JD
> On 10/18/2010 01:57 PM, orsch...@googlemail.com wrote:
> > Any suggestions which one to use?
> >
> > What are your personal recommendations?
> >
> > --
> > robert
> I found that current release of libreoffice is same as
> openoff
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 23:34 +0200, orsch...@googlemail.com wrote:
> The question is why it shouldn't be intended for productive use as it
> is based on OpenOffice that runs farly stable.
It's a beta because it's not finished and completely tested yet. While
it's bas
ticularly the part where
> > it says "This beta release is not intended for production use!"
> > --
> > MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com
> >
> >
> The question is why it shouldn't be intended for productive use as it
On 10/18/2010 01:57 PM, orsch...@googlemail.com wrote:
> Any suggestions which one to use?
>
> What are your personal recommendations?
>
> --
> robert
I found that current release of libreoffice is same as
openoffice. So take your own pick. They are the same.
--
users
The question is why it shouldn't be intended for productive use as it
is based on OpenOffice that runs farly stable.
Ok but following your answers there is currently no repo for Libreoffice.
That's what I wanted to know. :)
--
robert
2010/10/18 Frank Cox :
>
> On Mon, 201
On 18/10/10 22:17, Tom Horsley wrote:
>
> But will there be 190MB of updates to download every
> dadgum day like there has been for openoffice
> in the f14 repos? :-).
>
I don't get that much, maybe cause it's writer only.
Maybe twice updated since I branched to F14.
-
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 22:57 +0200, orsch...@googlemail.com wrote:
> Any suggestions which one to use?
Did you read the LibreOffice download page, particularly the part where
it says "This beta release is not intended for production use!"
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvillet
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 22:57 +0200, orsch...@googlemail.com wrote:
> Any suggestions which one to use?
>
> What are your personal recommendations?
If the one that you can "yum upgrade" from within Fedora, from the usual
repos, works fine for you, then use *it*. It's much easier to keep your
syst
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 22:14:31 +0100
Frank Murphy wrote:
> Libreoffice will obsolete Openoffice in F15.
But will there be 190MB of updates to download every
dadgum day like there has been for openoffice
in the f14 repos? :-).
(I've gotta remember to just not install openoffice
when
Ah ok good to know. Is Libreoffice already available in any repo?
--
robert
2010/10/18 Frank Murphy :
> On 18/10/10 21:57, orsch...@googlemail.com wrote:
>> Any suggestions which one to use?
>>
>
> Libreoffice will obsolete Openoffice in F15.
>
> --
> Regards,
&g
On 18/10/10 21:57, orsch...@googlemail.com wrote:
> Any suggestions which one to use?
>
Libreoffice will obsolete Openoffice in F15.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
Any suggestions which one to use?
What are your personal recommendations?
--
robert
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_gui
If you fed up with OOo the try this:
http://280slides.com/
Zoltan
2010/10/18 Patrick Dupre :
> Hello,
>
> On a fedora 11, I have an extremely slow open office presentation
> editor (3.1.1). It spending a lost of time in calculating what ?
>
> Thank
>
> --
> ---
>
Hello,
On a fedora 11, I have an extremely slow open office presentation
editor (3.1.1). It spending a lost of time in calculating what ?
Thank
--
---
==
Patrick DUPRÉ | |
Department of Chemistry
ically, Oracle
> bought Sun Microsystems for their hardware and the Solaris Operating System.
> All else is subject to discardment, either outright as was OpenSolaris or
> through sell-off (I expect this with StarOffice/OpenOffice, if it has
> not happened yet.) It may go to a company lik
1 - 100 of 229 matches
Mail list logo
