On Fri, 03 May 2013 19:02:41 +0930
Tim wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 23:51 +0200, poma wrote:
> > Regardless of how it can be called, it'd be useful not only for
> > testing throughput, but also for practicing mailing list fine arts -
> > and of course, also for offtopicing. ;)
> >
> > e.g. mu
On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 23:51 +0200, poma wrote:
> Regardless of how it can be called, it'd be useful not only for
> testing throughput, but also for practicing mailing list fine arts -
> and of course, also for offtopicing. ;)
>
> e.g. multit...@lists.fedoraproject.org
It can be beneficial to hav
On 02.05.2013 22:41, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 02 May 2013 21:51:53 +0200
> poma wrote:
>
>> On 02.05.2013 20:20, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>
>>> This was another issue. ;)
>>>
>>> Our old lists.fedoraproject.org server was slow and underpowered.
>>> This is why there was an outage yesterday as we
On Thu, 2 May 2013 11:50:47 -0700 (PDT)
William Mattison wrote:
> I checked my settings. I was mis-understanding what one of them
> meant. Now I know: "Mail delivery" set to "Disabled" also turns off
> reception of digests, too. I fixed it; I've since received a digest.
>
> By the way, I stil
On Thu, 02 May 2013 21:51:53 +0200
poma wrote:
> On 02.05.2013 20:20, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > This was another issue. ;)
> >
> > Our old lists.fedoraproject.org server was slow and underpowered.
> > This is why there was an outage yesterday as we moved to a new and
> > vastly overpowered ins
On 02.05.2013 20:20, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> This was another issue. ;)
>
> Our old lists.fedoraproject.org server was slow and underpowered.
> This is why there was an outage yesterday as we moved to a new and
> vastly overpowered instance. ;)
>
> Posts and archives should be pretty much instan
t; From: William Mattison
> To: "users@lists.fedoraproject.org"
> Cc:
> Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2013 10:58 AM
> Subject: not receiving anything from users at lists.fedoraproject.
>
>G ood morning,
>
> For several days now, I have not received anything from
>
On Thu, 2 May 2013 12:20:58 -0600
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Posts and archives should be pretty much instant now, if you see an
> issue please file a infrastructure ticket and we can look.
And this thread actually was pretty much instant. I guess the
delay is gone :-).
--
users mailing list
users@li
On Thu, 2 May 2013 14:04:49 -0400
Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Thu, 2 May 2013 11:50:20 -0600
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > I would stongly advise you to switch to a better email provider.
>
> Something besides yahoo is going on. I use gmail, and the past
> few days I've seen things show up on the lis
On Thu, 2 May 2013 11:50:20 -0600
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I would stongly advise you to switch to a better email provider.
Something besides yahoo is going on. I use gmail, and the past
few days I've seen things show up on the list archive hours before
a copy actually arrives in my mailbox (but I h
On Thu, 02 May 2013 17:05:22 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 02.05.2013 16:58, schrieb William Mattison:
> > Good morning,
> >
> > For several days now, I have not received anything from
> > users@lists.fedoraproject.org. I sent a message to "owner", but
> > received no response. How do
Am 02.05.2013 16:58, schrieb William Mattison:
> Good morning,
>
> For several days now, I have not received anything from
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org. I sent a message to "owner", but received no
> response. How do I get this fixed?
>
> Please reply to me as well as the list. I will a
Good morning,
For several days now, I have not received anything from
users@lists.fedoraproject.org. I sent a message to "owner", but received no
response. How do I get this fixed?
Please reply to me as well as the list. I will also check the archives later
today for answers.
thanks,
Bill
13 matches
Mail list logo
