On 4/4/23 12:44, Peter Boy wrote:
Am 04.04.2023 um 17:51 schrieb Robert McBroom via
users:
Fedora 37 with four qemu/kvm virtual machines. Trying to get internet access
from the vm's. Found some advice about using systemd-networkd instead of
NetworkManager.
Following „some advice“ is usually
> Am 04.04.2023 um 17:51 schrieb Robert McBroom via users
> :
>
> Fedora 37 with four qemu/kvm virtual machines. Trying to get internet access
> from the vm's. Found some advice about using systemd-networkd instead of
> NetworkManager.
Following „some advice“ is usually a good chance for adv
Fedora 37 with four qemu/kvm virtual machines. Trying to get internet
access from the vm's. Found some advice about using systemd-networkd
instead of NetworkManager. Lost internet connection with the host.
Restored with NetworkManager. Further research on NetworkManager gets
into a tangle with
On 2/26/19 11:39 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Do you understand what is going on with this extract of journalctl:
Feb 25 18:26:36 homere audit[1]: SERVICE_STOP pid=1 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295
subj=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0 msg='unit=NetworkManager-dispatcher comm="systemd"
exe="/usr/l
Hello,
Do you understand what is going on with this extract of journalctl:
+
Feb 25 18:26:26 homere NetworkManager[1273]: [1551115586.9960] manager:
NetworkManager state is now CONNECTED_LOCAL
Feb 25 18:26:26 homere NetworkManager[1273]: [1551115586.
I've had this happen about 3 times now and this time I copied the output
from DNF of the packages around the time network connectivity was lost.
The network icon in Gnome shell changes to a question mark and I haven't
found a solution (including restarting NetworkManager) that fixes it. The
only s
On 16/03/16 01:22, stan wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 07:56:29 +1100
Stephen Morris wrote:
[snip]
I could compile the kernel to set the flag, as a wireless connection
speed jumping from 525Mbps on 2.4GHz to 1.3Gbps on 5GHz can be
significant, especially when streaming. I'll need to research how t
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 07:56:29 +1100
Stephen Morris wrote:
[snip]
> I could compile the kernel to set the flag, as a wireless connection
> speed jumping from 525Mbps on 2.4GHz to 1.3Gbps on 5GHz can be
> significant, especially when streaming. I'll need to research how to
> compile a kernel unde
On 10/03/16 12:35, stan wrote:
On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 07:55:05 +1100
Stephen Morris wrote:
Thankyou for your response. I've just checked the config for the
4.4.3 kernel and CONFIG_ATH9K_CHANNEL_CONTEXT isn't set at all. I
could compile the kernel to set that flag, but is there any chance
that it
On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 07:55:05 +1100
Stephen Morris wrote:
> Thankyou for your response. I've just checked the config for the
> 4.4.3 kernel and CONFIG_ATH9K_CHANNEL_CONTEXT isn't set at all. I
> could compile the kernel to set that flag, but is there any chance
> that it would be set by default i
On 08/03/16 11:25, stan wrote:
On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 07:14:00 +1100
Stephen Morris wrote:
Hi,
I am using a dual channel Dlink DWA192 wireless USB adapter.
This adapter is supported in the kernel via the Ath9k driver, but
only the 2.4GHz band is supported, the 5 GHz band is not. Looking at
On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 07:14:00 +1100
Stephen Morris wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using a dual channel Dlink DWA192 wireless USB adapter.
> This adapter is supported in the kernel via the Ath9k driver, but
> only the 2.4GHz band is supported, the 5 GHz band is not. Looking at
> the Networkmanager conn
Hi,
I am using a dual channel Dlink DWA192 wireless USB adapter. This
adapter is supported in the kernel via the Ath9k driver, but only the
2.4GHz band is supported, the 5 GHz band is not. Looking at the
Networkmanager connection speed statistics the speed alternates between
135Mb/s and 1
On 01/10/2015 08:04 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 01/10/2015 10:00 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 01/11/15 10:58, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Are you thinking virbr0 interface on the base OS, or eth0 in the VM?
eth0 of the VM would be my first choice.
OK. I will try this tomorrow morning at the air
On 01/10/2015 10:00 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 01/11/15 10:58, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Are you thinking virbr0 interface on the base OS, or eth0 in the VM?
eth0 of the VM would be my first choice.
OK. I will try this tomorrow morning at the airport, after I resume there!
Unless someone has d
On 01/11/15 10:58, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> Are you thinking virbr0 interface on the base OS, or eth0 in the VM?
eth0 of the VM would be my first choice.
--
If you can't laugh at yourself, others will gladly oblige.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change s
On 01/10/2015 09:26 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 01/11/15 10:16, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
So far QEMM is working nicely for me. I have lots still to work out, but the
latest hickup is that after coming out of suspend with a VM running, said VM
does not have network connectivity.
How do I regain
On 01/11/15 10:16, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> So far QEMM is working nicely for me. I have lots still to work out, but the
> latest hickup is that after coming out of suspend with a VM running, said VM
> does not have network connectivity.
>
> How do I regain networking without shutting down the
So far QEMM is working nicely for me. I have lots still to work out,
but the latest hickup is that after coming out of suspend with a VM
running, said VM does not have network connectivity.
How do I regain networking without shutting down the VM and restarting
it? Testing is a bit of a pain,
On 16/09/14 15:08, Angelo Moreschini wrote:
I Steven,
you are very kind to answer me, but I am not able to avail myself of your help
...
I am newbie and do not know what are the "Fedora boxes" nor I know how to use
them.
Could you, please, explain to me how I have to practically conduct the te
I Steven,
you are very kind to answer me, but I am not able to avail myself of your help
...
I am newbie and do not know what are the "Fedora boxes" nor I know how to
use them.
Could you, please, explain to me how I have to practically conduct the test
you suggest me?
Thank you very much
Regar
On 09/15/2014 11:30 AM, Angelo Moreschini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a wired network with 3 computers (a, b, c)
> a - SO Fedora
> b - SO Fedora
> c - SO Windows 7
>
> The computers a and b have access to a local network (widow workgroup on
> nautilus) to see the computer c.
> But a and b (the two co
Hi,
I have a wired network with 3 computers (a, b, c)
a - SO Fedora
b - SO Fedora
c - SO Windows 7
The computers a and b have access to a local network (widow workgroup on
nautilus) to see the computer c.
But a and b (the two computers with Fedora) cannot see each the other...
(in short the 2 co
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 05:18:32PM +0100, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 10:00:59 -0500
> Dale Dellutri wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Marko Vojinovic
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Before I go complain to my ISP, I'd like to hear if anyone can give
> > > me an idea what is goi
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 10:00:59 -0500
Dale Dellutri wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Marko Vojinovic
> wrote:
> >
> > Before I go complain to my ISP, I'd like to hear if anyone can give
> > me an idea what is going on with my networks... :-)
> >
> > I have two machines, with following link
On 13.08.2013 14:09, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
…
> Any ideas how to troubleshoot this?
>
Tell to ISP.
> Also, any ideas what to tell to my ISP?
>
You've already said here. :)
> I could ask them to look into it, but they just might open a bunch of
> youtube links, verify that the link works, and bl
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>
> Hi folks! :-)
>
> Before I go complain to my ISP, I'd like to hear if anyone can give me
> an idea what is going on with my networks... :-)
>
> I have two machines, with following link properties:
>
> local --- 20Mbps/2Mbps (GSM wireles
On 08/13/2013 07:09 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>
> Hi folks! :-)
>
> Before I go complain to my ISP, I'd like to hear if anyone can give me
> an idea what is going on with my networks... :-)
>
> I have two machines, with following link properties:
>
> local --- 20Mbps/2Mbps (GSM wireless)
> r
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 08:55:44 -0400
Fred Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 01:09:09PM +0100, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> >
> > Another test of the local link --- I went to
> >
> > http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
> >
> > and clicked the big blue "download now" button, to download the Live
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 01:09:09PM +0100, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>
> Hi folks! :-)
>
> Before I go complain to my ISP, I'd like to hear if anyone can give me
> an idea what is going on with my networks... :-)
>
> I have two machines, with following link properties:
>
> local --- 20Mbps/2Mbps (
Hi folks! :-)
Before I go complain to my ISP, I'd like to hear if anyone can give me
an idea what is going on with my networks... :-)
I have two machines, with following link properties:
local --- 20Mbps/2Mbps (GSM wireless)
remote --- 100Mbps/100Mbps (100Mbit LAN connected to optical uplink)
Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:08:19AM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 02:01:43PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
This is back, again. Having found out that fedup fails
totally to work on drives with encrypted partitions,
I don't t
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
Firstly. Calm down. I believe your preconceptions are mostly at issue
here.
If you mean the preconception that install from DVD should not need a network
connection, that's exactly the issue. After install the upgrade comes from
an
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:03:07PM +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Jul 2013 15:57:21 -0400
> "Darryl L. Pierce" wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 02:01:43PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> > > This is back, again. Having found out that fedup fails
> > > totally to work on drives with en
talking about notice.
> >
> Go back, read my post.
Go back, please, and re-read my reply. I was specifically talking about
fedup and encrypted file systems. Nothing about DVD installs. Completely
about fedup.
> I put a DVD into the machine with no network
> connection to do an insta
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:08:19AM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> >On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 02:01:43PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> >>This is back, again. Having found out that fedup fails
> >>totally to work on drives with encrypted partitions,
> >
> >I don't think this i
t happen on the same machine with Mint, Ubuntu, or Puppy, and
>>> the
>>> other machine which has this issue installed Slackware fine. Note: after
>>> installing Slackware the problem went away, installing Ubentu didn't fix the
>>> machine of interest.
>>>
irstly. Calm down. I believe your preconceptions are mostly at issue
here.
If you mean the preconception that install from DVD should not need a network
connection, that's exactly the issue. After install the upgrade comes from
another DVD holding a local repo of common things which have been
On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 11:08 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 02:01:43PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> >> This is back, again. Having found out that fedup fails
> >> totally to work on drives with encrypted partitions,
> >
> > I don't think this is s
Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 02:01:43PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
This is back, again. Having found out that fedup fails
totally to work on drives with encrypted partitions,
I don't think this is still the case: I did F18->F19 on my laptop
(encrypted /home and swap) using
On Mon, 22 Jul 2013 15:57:21 -0400
"Darryl L. Pierce" wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 02:01:43PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> > This is back, again. Having found out that fedup fails
> > totally to work on drives with encrypted partitions,
>
> I don't think this is still the case: I did F18-
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 02:01:43PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> This is back, again. Having found out that fedup fails
> totally to work on drives with encrypted partitions,
I don't think this is still the case: I did F18->F19 on my laptop
(encrypted /home and swap) using fedup and it worked ju
This is back, again. Having found out that fedup fails totally to work on
drives with encrypted partitions, I tried to install from DVD. The DVD is good,
the system is good, I booted in recovery but the partitions were not recognized
as anything at all, so I rebooted to do full install from DVD
Subject: Re: FC15/16 NetworkManager drops network connection
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:09 AM, Symersky, Henry
wrote:
> Can someone please explain to me how to configure the NetworkManager in
> order to KEEP ETEHERNET CONNECTTION EVEN AFTER LOGGING OUT ??
> Thanks.
Usually in the past (we
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:09 AM, Symersky, Henry
wrote:
> Can someone please explain to me how to configure the NetworkManager in
> order to KEEP ETEHERNET CONNECTTION EVEN AFTER LOGGING OUT ??
> Thanks.
Usually in the past (well for me always in the past once NM was fully
operational) you can g
Dear all,
I may have found answer to my previous question regarding disabled login and
the message:
"could not update ICEauthority file /home/username/.ICEauthority"
I found that whenever I logout as root, the NetworkManager closes ethernet
connection.
So whenever I want to login as normal use
Antonio M gmail.com> writes:
> ...
> I find strange that if I am connected to wireless network A, after
> suspending the computer and un-suspending it, computer will connect to
> network B(I have many available wireless networks at same site..)
> Is it a normal behaviour??
>
Well, follow t
2011/7/6 JB :
> Abu Attar Musharih gmail.com> writes:
>
>>
>> Dear List,
>>
>> I connect to the internet via wireless. There are two available
>> connections, the first one is set up by myself (insert IP etc), the
>> other is automatically found by the network manager.
>>
>> The problem is, the
Abu Attar Musharih gmail.com> writes:
>
> Dear List,
>
> I connect to the internet via wireless. There are two available
> connections, the first one is set up by myself (insert IP etc), the
> other is automatically found by the network manager.
>
> The problem is, the network manager somet
Dear List,
I connect to the internet via wireless. There are two available
connections, the first one is set up by myself (insert IP etc), the
other is automatically found by the network manager.
The problem is, the network manager sometimes changes the connection
to the automatically found on
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Since I upgrade from fc13 to fc14, I cannot connect to the network !
>
> I get:
>
> Bringing up loopback interface: [ OK ]
> Bringing up interface eth0: Active connection state: activating
> Active conn
Hello,
Since I upgrade from fc13 to fc14, I cannot connect to the network !
I get:
Bringing up loopback interface:[ OK ]
Bringing up interface eth0: Active connection state: activating
Active connection path: /org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/ActiveConnection/3
(pr
Forwarding to list.
The OP can use Firefox from Linux.
James McKenzie
Original Message
Subject:Re: Wine , No Network connection
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 12:06:13 -0400
From: Jim
To: James Mckenzie
On 09/21/2010 11:48 AM, James Mckenzie wrote:
>
On 09/21/10 17:31, Jim wrote:
> FC13/KDE
>
> How do I get a Network Connection with Wine.
>
> I have a eth0 wired connection on Fedora 13.
Hi Jim,
having no problems with wine-1.2.0-2.fc13.i686 in F13: I installed ie6
with winetricks, and I can access other sites connected v
Jim wrote
>
> FC13/KDE
>
>How do I get a Network Connection with Wine.
>
>I have a eth0 wired connection on Fedora 13.
Jim:
Just a few questions:
1. Can you use a program like Firefox to access the Internet from Linux?
2. What are you trying to do from inside Wine?
3. Wh
FC13/KDE
How do I get a Network Connection with Wine.
I have a eth0 wired connection on Fedora 13.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org
Thomas Taylor wrote:
> Thanks for your reply, G. JB tipped me off to that too, I'll check it out
> tomorrow. Time for bed, the old eyes are getting bleary.
welcome.
yes, jb replied while i was writing up what i found at yumex site.
so, if you are using 2.9.6 or higher, you should be 'good t
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 07:32:53 +
g wrote:
> Thomas Taylor wrote:
>
>
> > Hi G;
> >> *yumex* is seeing the network connection as disabled because it is
> >> checking for connection thru 'gui'.
> >
> > I'm not using a gui network
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 07:16:46 + (UTC)
JB wrote:
> JB gmail.com> writes:
>
> >
> > Thomas Taylor comcast.net> writes:
> >
> > >
> > > For some reason Yumex returns an error message saying "Not connected to an
> > > network. Do you want to continue". However Yum works as expected running
Thomas Taylor wrote:
> Hi G;
>> *yumex* is seeing the network connection as disabled because it is
>> checking for connection thru 'gui'.
>
> I'm not using a gui network connection but ifup method if that is what
> you're saying.
ok. then i underst
JB gmail.com> writes:
>
> Thomas Taylor comcast.net> writes:
>
> >
> > For some reason Yumex returns an error message saying "Not connected to an
> > network. Do you want to continue". However Yum works as expected running
> > updates.
> >
> man yumex
> yumex ... –disable-netcheck ...
>
Thomas Taylor comcast.net> writes:
>
> For some reason Yumex returns an error message saying "Not connected to an
> network. Do you want to continue". However Yum works as expected running
> updates.
>
man yumex
yumex ... –disable-netcheck ...
Fedora/Red Hat bugs:
bugzilla.redhat.com/
JB
gt; even when I didn't have a connection to the network.
>
Hi Dar;
Yes, I ran "yum update yumex" but that didn't change the behavior.
Hi G;
> *yumex* is seeing the network connection as disabled because it is checking
> for connection thru 'gui'.
I'm
Thomas Taylor wrote:
> For some reason Yumex returns an error message saying "Not connected to an
> network. Do you want to continue". However Yum works as expected running
> updates.
i had same problems.
*yumex* is seeing the network connection as disabled because it is chec
On Wednesday, 14 July, 2010 @01:56 zulu Thomas Taylor scribed:
> Where else should I look?
Did you try
# yum update yumex
?
FWIW, I do not recall ever seeing that message from yumex,
even when I didn't have a connection to the network.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To un
For some reason Yumex returns an error message saying "Not connected to an
network. Do you want to continue". However Yum works as expected running
updates.
I'm just re-learning Fedora after about five years in other distros and haven't
been able to find the source of this error. ~/.yumex.conf
Lewis,
Sounds like it may be routing. Look at your routing table by entering
'route' at the command line of a terminal.
You should see several lines, the last of which is 'default' and should
have an IP address in the gateway column.
This tell the tcp/ip in your system where to go when it
67 matches
Mail list logo
