Re: lp versus enscript

2011-03-17 Thread Aaron Konstam
On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 17:32 -0500, Robert Nichols wrote: > On 03/16/2011 05:15 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 11:57 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > >> I needed to print and Internet Draft 2 sided and two up. My colleague > >> suggested lpr, but that does not have enough option

Re: lp versus enscript

2011-03-16 Thread Robert Nichols
On 03/16/2011 05:15 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote: > On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 11:57 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> I needed to print and Internet Draft 2 sided and two up. My colleague >> suggested lpr, but that does not have enough options, but I figured out >> how to use lp: >> >> lp -d HP-Officejet-8

Re: lp versus enscript

2011-03-16 Thread Aaron Konstam
On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 11:57 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > I needed to print and Internet Draft 2 sided and two up. My colleague > suggested lpr, but that does not have enough options, but I figured out > how to use lp: > > lp -d HP-Officejet-8500 -o sides=two-sided-short-edge -o number-up=2

Re: lp versus enscript

2011-03-16 Thread Jerry Feldman
On 03/16/2011 11:57 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > I needed to print and Internet Draft 2 sided and two up. My colleague > suggested lpr, but that does not have enough options, but I figured out > how to use lp: > > lp -d HP-Officejet-8500 -o sides=two-sided-short-edge -o number-up=2 > RFC5201-b

lp versus enscript

2011-03-16 Thread Robert Moskowitz
I needed to print and Internet Draft 2 sided and two up. My colleague suggested lpr, but that does not have enough options, but I figured out how to use lp: lp -d HP-Officejet-8500 -o sides=two-sided-short-edge -o number-up=2 RFC5201-bis.txt But then he came back and said enscript is better a