>> The script should be written to use 'file' not just parse the extension.
>
>
> Why? Just because in <.001% of the time the extension will be wrong? Not
> exactly an efficient use of resources.
Are you in that much of a hurry to get your logwatch reports?
I'd prefer to have a more accurate pro
Am 24.10.2012 19:20, schrieb Joe Zeff:
> On 10/24/2012 08:58 AM, Alex wrote:
>> The script should be written to use 'file' not just parse the extension.
>
> Why? Just because in <.001% of the time the extension will be wrong? Not
> exactly an efficient use of resources.
because it is NOT the
On 10/24/2012 08:58 AM, Alex wrote:
The script should be written to use 'file' not just parse the extension.
Why? Just because in <.001% of the time the extension will be wrong?
Not exactly an efficient use of resources.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or c
>> I have an fc15 box and I'm having a problem with logwatch. I'm using
>> bzip2 for the compresscmd for logrotate, yet it somehow is giving the
>> compressed files a gz instead of bz2 extension. Logwatch uses this to
>> determine which command to use to read the compressed files, so it
>> therefor
Alex pise:
> Hi,
>
> I have an fc15 box and I'm having a problem with logwatch. I'm using
> bzip2 for the compresscmd for logrotate, yet it somehow is giving the
> compressed files a gz instead of bz2 extension. Logwatch uses this to
> determine which command to use to read the compressed files, s
Hi,
I have an fc15 box and I'm having a problem with logwatch. I'm using
bzip2 for the compresscmd for logrotate, yet it somehow is giving the
compressed files a gz instead of bz2 extension. Logwatch uses this to
determine which command to use to read the compressed files, so it
therefore is using
