>
> On 6/17/25 12:51 AM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> >> If you've set B and C to static addresses in the 10.40.0.0 subnet, then
> >> obviously you have to change one or the other. The bridge doesn't have
> >> a gateway or DNS, that's a setting for the clients.
> >
> > The bizarre thing is th
On 6/17/25 12:51 AM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
If you've set B and C to static addresses in the 10.40.0.0 subnet, then
obviously you have to change one or the other. The bridge doesn't have
a gateway or DNS, that's a setting for the clients.
The bizarre thing is that I cannot switch the b
you mean by this. I would recommend that PC B and C
> >>>>> have static addresses. I don't think the DHCP reservations are
> >>>>> preserved.
> >>>> They are static
> >>>> The only static ones are bridge0 port1 and port2
&
Hi.
Just a note on using "netstat -rn" versus "ip route":
From man netstat (re-formatted):
NOTES
This program is mostly obsolete.
Replacement for netstat is ss.
Replacement for netstat -r is ip route.
Replacement for netstat -i is ip -s link.
Replacement for n
0 0 0 bridge0
192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
enp0s20f0u11
192.168.122.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 virbr0
But with this configuration, the local network does not work.
Probably because the bridge port is set in 10.42
t; preserved.
> > > They are static
> > > The only static ones are bridge0 port1 and port2
> > > and
> > > USB Ethernet (enp0s20f0u11)
> >
> > I don't understand what you mean about the ports. Whatever those are,
> > they shouldn't be c
On 6/16/25 11:44 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
I don't understand what you mean about the ports. Whatever those are,
they shouldn't be configured.
Maybe, but I dod not configure any thing on that side.
It is done automatically by fedora
The only option that I se is to disable the interfac
> On 6/16/25 2:38 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> >>
> >> On 6/16/25 2:11 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> >>> OK,
> >>>
> >>> Now it is working with
> >>> Kernel IP routing table
> >>> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt
> >>> Iface
> >>> 0.0.0.0
On 6/16/25 7:37 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Although the network manager is "suppose" to do this
(or something similar), I discovered the following
corrected the problem:
"#" means as "root"
# systemctl restart NetworkManager.service
If you run it as a user, systemctl will promp
On 6/16/25 3:24 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 6/16/25 2:38 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
On 6/16/25 2:11 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
OK,
Now it is working with
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window
irtt Iface
0.0.0.0 192.1
On 6/16/25 2:11 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
OK,
Now it is working with
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface
0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG0 0 0
enp0s20f0u11
0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1
On 6/16/25 2:38 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
On 6/16/25 2:11 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
OK,
Now it is working with
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface
0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG0 0
>
> On 6/16/25 2:11 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> > OK,
> >
> > Now it is working with
> > Kernel IP routing table
> > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt
> > Iface
> > 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG0 0 0
> > enp0s2
OK,
Now it is working with
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface
0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG0 0 0
enp0s20f0u11
0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG0 0 0 bridge0
On 6/16/25 12:25 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
On 6/14/25 11:28 AM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
Hello,
I tried to fix a small issue that I have.
PC A is connected to internet through a USB port.
This PC A has 2 RJ45 cards, connected to 2 PC: B and C.
Both interface are in shared to o
>
> On 6/14/25 11:28 AM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I tried to fix a small issue that I have.
> > PC A is connected to internet through a USB port.
> > This PC A has 2 RJ45 cards, connected to 2 PC: B and C.
> > Both interface are in shared to other computers
> >
> > The p
On 6/14/25 11:28 AM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
Hello,
I tried to fix a small issue that I have.
PC A is connected to internet through a USB port.
This PC A has 2 RJ45 cards, connected to 2 PC: B and C.
Both interface are in shared to other computers
The problem is this one.
I use /etc/host
On 6/15/25 4:27 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
1) I cannot configure properly manually my interfaces on PC A, ie. enp1s0 and
enp2s0
I do not know why.
I tried 10.42.0.1 and 10.42.0.2
They can't be in the same subnet unless they are bridged somewhere. And
you won't have the forwarding and
This is what I have done.
1) I cannot configure properly manually my interfaces on PC A, ie. enp1s0 and
enp2s0
I do not know why.
I tried 10.42.0.1 and 10.42.0.2
Thenk I played with Gateway and DNS.
Hence, I switched to shared to other computer.
it turned to 10.42.0.1 and 10.42.1.1
Then, I can m
On 6/15/25 12:32 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 6/15/25 1:42 AM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
PC A is connected to internet and it is fine. device enp0s20f0u11
It is in automatic setting.
This PC has 2 ethernet cards
By default
enp1s0 (connected to PC B) and enp2s0 (connected to PC C)
If I unders
On 6/15/25 1:42 AM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
PC A is connected to internet and it is fine. device enp0s20f0u11
It is in automatic setting.
This PC has 2 ethernet cards
By default
enp1s0 (connected to PC B) and enp2s0 (connected to PC C)
If I understand PC A run as a router.
By default (sh
I tried to set up manually which only one PC, using the network manager.
nm-connection-editor
offers very similar options to my understanding.
I configured manually the interface on PC A and on PB C.
I works, except the DNS does not work.
I did not find the right setting.
>
> On Sun, 2025-06-15 a
On Sun, 2025-06-15 at 01:37 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> The internet is connected through the USB interface. Then there are two
> RJ45 ports, one for each of B and C.
Yes, I know. I think *you* have failed to comprehend my responses,
initial and subsequent. Read through them again, carefully.
AM
> From: "Samuel Sieb"
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: local network
>
> On 6/14/25 10:04 PM, Tim via users wrote:
> > USB device
> > 10.42.0.254
> > |
On 6/15/25 1:11 AM, Tim via users wrote:
On 6/14/25 10:04 PM, Tim via users wrote:
USB device
10.42.0.254
| <-- Top half in same IP range
| as themselves (first three
10.42.0.1
On 6/14/25 10:04 PM, Tim via users wrote:
> > USB device
> > 10.42.0.254
> > | <-- Top half in same IP range
> > | as themselves (first three
> > 10.42.0.1 quads match each oth
On 6/14/25 10:04 PM, Tim via users wrote:
USB device
10.42.0.254
| <-- Top half in same IP range
| as themselves (first three
10.42.0.1 quads match each other).
On Sat, 2025-06-14 at 20:28 +0200, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> I tried to fix a small issue that I have.
> PC A is connected to internet through a USB port.
> This PC A has 2 RJ45 cards, connected to 2 PC: B and C.
> Both interface are in shared to other computers
>
> The problem is this one.
On 6/14/25 11:28 AM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
How can I solve this issue?
On PC A: Do I need to switch from shared to other computers to Manual?
If Yes how should I configure ?
10.42.1.0 255.255.255.0 Gateway? DNS ?
Use "nm-connection-editor" to set the IP address range for each
interf
> On 14 Jun 2025, at 19:28, Patrick Dupre via users
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I tried to fix a small issue that I have.
> PC A is connected to internet through a USB port.
> This PC A has 2 RJ45 cards, connected to 2 PC: B and C.
> Both interface are in shared to other computers
>
> The probl
Hello,
I tried to fix a small issue that I have.
PC A is connected to internet through a USB port.
This PC A has 2 RJ45 cards, connected to 2 PC: B and C.
Both interface are in shared to other computers
The problem is this one.
I use /etc/hosts to put a name to each PC connected to A.
PC A is nor
Hello, i have a little problem sharing my zfs share to my local network,
trying to get it on my virtual machin (which uses the bridge too) and on my
local network.
Share is enable on zfs, i setup things with samba but smtree is still empty
and i don't see the folder in file explorer
here
On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 06:42 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> The analogy of the telephone number and extension is a good one. The
> only thing I would add is that the extension (port/service) number is
> generally fixed, standardized.
>
> A list is kept by the IANA (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority)
Thank you to all
Regards
Angelo
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 1:42 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 10/07/14 23:53, Angelo Moreschini wrote:
> > thank you Ed, I learned many things from you. Actually I am a Linux
> beginner
>
> Welcome to Linux.
>
> Mostly what has been discussed here is networking
On 10/07/14 23:53, Angelo Moreschini wrote:
> thank you Ed, I learned many things from you. Actually I am a Linux beginner
>
Welcome to Linux.
Mostly what has been discussed here is networking concepts. The same applies
to any network connected device just the location and way the conf
On 10/07/2014 08:53 AM, Angelo Moreschini wrote:
Just another question, if I can, please:
it exists some fix relation between the "port number" of the servers
and the theirs IP number ?
No. Think of the IP as the machine's phone number, and the port number
as a particular service's extension
thank you Ed, I learned many things from you. Actually I am a Linux
beginner
Just another question, if I can, please:
it exists some fix relation between the "port number" of the servers and
the theirs IP number ?
It is some kind of correlation between them ?
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 1:40
On 10/07/14 16:43, Angelo Moreschini wrote:
> I made it.
> The optut was:
> option dhcp-server-identifier 10.0.0.138;
> option dhcp-server-identifier 10.0.0.138;
> option dhcp-server-identifier 10.0.0.138;
> option dhcp-server-identifier 10.0.0.138;
> option dhcp-server-identifier 10.0.0
I made it.
The optut was:
option dhcp-server-identifier 10.0.0.138;
option dhcp-server-identifier 10.0.0.138;
option dhcp-server-identifier 10.0.0.138;
option dhcp-server-identifier 10.0.0.138;
option dhcp-server-identifier 10.0.0.138;
option dhcp-server-identifier 10.0.0.138;
option
On 10/07/14 15:47, Angelo Moreschini wrote:
> for me the value is :
> lf
> /var/lib/NetworkManager/dhclient-40d1ee1f-f089-4c90-afd9-e37016bc720c-em0.lease
>
> but I don't know about what file are you talking ...
cat
/var/lib/NetworkManager/dhclient-40d1ee1f-f089-4c90-afd9-e37016bc720c-em0.lease
for me the value is :
lf
/var/lib/NetworkManager/dhclient-40d1ee1f-f089-4c90-afd9-e37016bc720c-em0.lease
but I don't know about what file are you talking ...
thank you
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 10/06/14 20:51, Dave Ihnat wrote:
> > I would also wonder if there are
On 10/06/14 20:51, Dave Ihnat wrote:
> I would also wonder if there are dueling DHCP servers
> on the segment.
You should be able to determine if there are dueling DHCP servers by doing a
"ps -eaf | grep dhclient" and looking for the -lf parameter and then examining
the contents of the file.
In
On 10/06/2014 02:51 PM, Dave Ihnat wrote:
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 02:22:42PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 10/06/2014 01:02 PM, Angelo Moreschini wrote:
That's not unusual with DHCP. DHCP assigned IP-addresses usually
have limited life-time until they expire. After expiration machines
may be a
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 02:22:42PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 10/06/2014 01:02 PM, Angelo Moreschini wrote:
> That's not unusual with DHCP. DHCP assigned IP-addresses usually
> have limited life-time until they expire. After expiration machines
> may be assigned a new IP-address.
However, I
On 10/06/2014 01:02 PM, Angelo Moreschini wrote:
Hi,
I can only think that all can be correlated tothe dynamic assignmentof
the IP address (DHCP),
My guess would be the same.
but the change of the IP happen also if the
computers are not rebooted.
That's not unusual with DHCP. DHCP assigned
Hi,
I am newbie to Fedora and I would like ask for a (for me important)
clarification regarding the assignment of the IP address of the computers
of my LAN.
Having problems to access to a repository located on another computer on my
LAN, I used, several times, the ping command to check the acces
46 matches
Mail list logo
