Hello Michael,
On Sat, 2015-10-24 at 13:59 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Oct 2015 00:31:48 +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> > If I do not require the autoreconf step for a rebuild on CentOS 6 then
> > it is surely redundant on Fedora 22?
>
> No. On F22 if would fail, because t
On Sat, 24 Oct 2015 00:31:48 +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> > Build output should tell. Autotools are quite smart, and as long as the
> > main configure script is available, it may notice that some output files
> > that are out-of-date. It will tell if it tries to regenerate files.
>
> Au
Hi,
On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 23:43 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 23:28:19 +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> > I skipped the autoreconf step on my C6 build and the build went fine.
> > What will the skipping of the autoreconf step have resulted in?
>
> Build output should
On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 23:28:19 +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> > The unbundling-gsm patch touches Makefile template/include files, so yes,
> > regenerating the autotools files will be necessary.
>
> I skipped the autoreconf step on my C6 build and the build went fine.
> What will the skippin
Hi,
On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 22:47 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Having pointed you at the "gsm" package, you can look up its package
> description. ;-p
:)
> > So what about the autoreconf step? Is that really necessary?
>
> The unbundling-gsm patch touches Makefile template/include files, so y
On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 14:23:21 +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> > libsndfile is patched to link with the system libgsm (from package "gsm")
> > instead of building with a bundled copy.
>
> Doesn't quite explain *what* GSM610 is, but it explains the name of the
> patch ilbsndfile-1.0.25-system
Hello Michael,
On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 12:10 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> It explains itself, if you notice the patches that are applied, and the
> file name of the patches.
>
> libsndfile is patched to link with the system libgsm (from package "gsm")
> instead of building with a bundled copy.
On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 00:51:30 +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The lisbsndfile-1.0.25-14.fc22 spec removes the GSM610 code and then
> does an autoreconf.
>
> What is the GSM610 code and why is it removed?
It explains itself, if you notice the patches that are applied, and the
file
Hi,
The lisbsndfile-1.0.25-14.fc22 spec removes the GSM610 code and then
does an autoreconf.
What is the GSM610 code and why is it removed?
What is the autoreconf step supposed to accomplish? Build seems fine on
CentOS 6 without it.
Regards,
Leonard.
--
mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/r
