On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 01:12 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 07/27/2010 01:09 AM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > Sigh. Too bad.
> >
> > Was there any reasoning on this, now that it has a legitimate, legal
> > use? Was that exemption considered too narrow or is there another
> > reason? I mean,
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 15:39:32 -0400,
"Michael H. Warfield" wrote:
>
> Was there any reasoning on this, now that it has a legitimate, legal
> use? Was that exemption considered too narrow or is there another
> reason? I mean, there is software in there that can be used for illegal
> activit
On 07/27/2010 01:09 AM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> Sigh. Too bad.
>
> Was there any reasoning on this, now that it has a legitimate, legal
> use? Was that exemption considered too narrow or is there another
> reason? I mean, there is software in there that can be used for illegal
> activities,
On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 00:54 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 07/27/2010 12:52 AM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > Hey all!
> >
> > Does this mean that we can finally get libdvdcss/libdvdcss2 into Fedora
> > for real?
> >
>
> No.
>
> http://identi.ca/conversation/43523461#notice-43824529
Sig
On 07/27/2010 12:52 AM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> Hey all!
>
> Does this mean that we can finally get libdvdcss/libdvdcss2 into Fedora
> for real?
>
No.
http://identi.ca/conversation/43523461#notice-43824529
Rahul
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or chan
Hey all!
Does this mean that we can finally get libdvdcss/libdvdcss2 into Fedora
for real?
Apple loses big in DRM ruling: jailbreaks are "fair use"
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/07/apple-loses-big-in-drm-ruling-jailbreaks-are-fair-use.ars?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=
