On 10/13/2010 03:55 PM, Clemens Eisserer wrote:
>>> Yehiel, what is the RSS (Resident Set Size) for kglobalaccel ?
>>>
>>> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND
>>> 2480 djyb 20 0 183m 127m 4048 S 0.0 12.7 0:49.64 kglobalaccel
>>>
>>> according to top, 127m
>> Yehiel, what is the RSS (Resident Set Size) for kglobalaccel ?
>>
>> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
>> 2480 djyb 20 0 183m 127m 4048 S 0.0 12.7 0:49.64 kglobalaccel
>>
>> according to top, 127m, I guess that 127MB
WoW, sounds to me way too much for
On 10/13/2010 02:08 PM, Dj YB wrote:
> On Wednesday October 13 2010 22:16:27 JD wrote:
>> On 10/13/2010 12:02 PM, Dj YB wrote:
>> On Wednesday October 13 2010 20:40:05 JD wrote:
>>
>>On 10/13/2010 11:24 AM, Kwan Lowe wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Dj YB wrote:
>>
>> tried t
On 10/13/2010 12:02 PM, Dj YB wrote:
On Wednesday October 13 2010 20:40:05 JD wrote:
On 10/13/2010 11:24 AM, Kwan Lowe wrote:
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Dj YB wrote:
tried the fedora-kde list first but got n
On 10/13/2010 11:24 AM, Kwan Lowe wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Dj YB wrote:
>> tried the fedora-kde list first but got no response.
>>
>> whenever I look at the processes table I see that kglobalaccel is taking
>> about
>> 125 MB of memory, that is a lot.
>> I admit that I have lot
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Dj YB wrote:
>
> tried the fedora-kde list first but got no response.
>
> whenever I look at the processes table I see that kglobalaccel is taking about
> 125 MB of memory, that is a lot.
> I admit that I have lot's of shortcuts and gestures, but still, is that num
