> You used a technical term incorrectly. How is it a waste of bandwidth
> to correct you and show you how it should be used? Or is it simply that
> you don't want to learn to use it correctly?
Well you please take your pointless arguing somewhere else. Especially if
you are going to start sent
Jared K. Smith wrote:
> Yes, as I understand it the kernel key is used for module signing.
> The most obvious new use for module signing is Secure Boot, so
> that the kernel will only load modules signed with its key.
JD wrote:
> If what you say is true, then the kernel config option
> CONFIG_MODV
On 11/27/2012 01:32 PM, JD wrote:
On 11/27/2012 02:22 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 11/27/2012 12:42 PM, JD wrote:
And that begs another question.
THWAP!
No, it doesn't. It *asks* another question. Begging the question
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Begging_the_question) is something
entirely d
On 11/27/2012 02:22 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 11/27/2012 12:42 PM, JD wrote:
And that begs another question.
THWAP!
No, it doesn't. It *asks* another question. Begging the question
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Begging_the_question) is something
entirely different. Please, either learn w
On 11/27/2012 12:42 PM, JD wrote:
And that begs another question.
THWAP!
No, it doesn't. It *asks* another question. Begging the question
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Begging_the_question) is something
entirely different. Please, either learn what the term means or stop
using it!
--
On 11/27/2012 01:33 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 11/27/2012 12:21 PM, Jared K. Smith wrote:
Yes, as I understand it the kernel key is used for module signing.
The most obvious new use for module signing is Secure Boot, so that
the kernel will only load modules signed with its key.
Is there one key
On 11/27/2012 01:21 PM, Jared K. Smith wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:13 AM, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr.
wrote:
Might this be the "UEFI" thing that I've been reading up about? I
myself don't even understand how it works, but this sounds like
something that MIGHT be related to that?...just my opi
On 11/27/2012 12:21 PM, Jared K. Smith wrote:
Yes, as I understand it the kernel key is used for module signing.
The most obvious new use for module signing is Secure Boot, so that
the kernel will only load modules signed with its key.
Is there one key for each kernel version, or is it specific
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:13 AM, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr.
wrote:
> Might this be the "UEFI" thing that I've been reading up about? I myself
> don't even understand how it works, but this sounds like something that
> MIGHT be related to that?...just my opinion
Yes, as I understand it the kernel
On 11/26/2012 01:59 AM, JD wrote:
On 11/25/2012 11:46 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 11/26/2012 01:11 AM, JD wrote:
I was building kernel 3.7-0.rc6.git.fc19 and during the build
I saw this:
Generating a 4096 bit RSA private key
Only 4096 Is that strong enough Shouldn't it be 819
2012/11/26 Christopher Svanefalk
> Linus is watching you.
>
> Best,
>
> Christopher Svanefalk
> mob: +46762628251
> skype: csvanefalk
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 7:59 AM, JD wrote:
>
>>
>> On 11/25/2012 11:46 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 11/26/2012 01:11 AM, JD wrote:
>>>
>
Linus is watching you.
Best,
Christopher Svanefalk
mob: +46762628251
skype: csvanefalk
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 7:59 AM, JD wrote:
>
> On 11/25/2012 11:46 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>>
>> On 11/26/2012 01:11 AM, JD wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I was building kernel 3.7-0.rc6.git.fc19 and during the b
On 11/25/2012 11:46 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 11/26/2012 01:11 AM, JD wrote:
I was building kernel 3.7-0.rc6.git.fc19 and during the build
I saw this:
Generating a 4096 bit RSA private key
Only 4096 Is that strong enough Shouldn't it be 8192? :)
.++
..
On 11/26/2012 01:11 AM, JD wrote:
I was building kernel 3.7-0.rc6.git.fc19 and during the build
I saw this:
Generating a 4096 bit RSA private key
Only 4096 Is that strong enough Shouldn't it be 8192? :)
.++
...
I was building kernel 3.7-0.rc6.git.fc19 and during the build
I saw this:
Generating a 4096 bit RSA private key
.++
15 matches
Mail list logo