Re: amdgpu firmware failure (was: kernel module won't load)

stan via users composed on 2022-10-26 20:07 (UTC-0700): > On Wed, 26 Oct 2022 14:06:04 -0400 Felix Miata wrote: >> # diff -u kcfg51819.txt kcfg51917.txt >> --- kcfg51819.txt 2022-10-26 13:45:37.0 -0400 >> +++ kcfg51917.txt 2022-10-26 13:45:58.0 -0400 >> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @

Re: amdgpu kernel module won't load

On Wed, 26 Oct 2022 14:06:04 -0400 Felix Miata wrote: > Sea Islands is GCN2 initially released 201309: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphics_Core_Next#second Don't have it, but I had no idea I was so out of date. That is almost ten years ago. My card does everything I need, so I suppose I c

Re: amdgpu kernel module won't load

stan via users composed on 2022-10-26 09:13 (UTC-0700): > On Wed, 26 Oct 2022 00:55:51 -0400 Felix Miata wrote: >> Using old kernel, all is good, while with newer kernels, nothing is >> possible except via remote login - no video, no keyboard. >> I reported similar trouble in Bugzilla month ago w

Re: amdgpu kernel module won't load

On Wed, 26 Oct 2022 00:55:51 -0400 Felix Miata wrote: [remove problem exploration] > Using old kernel, all is good, while with newer kernels, nothing is > possible except via remote login - no video, no keyboard. > > I reported similar trouble in Bugzilla month ago with much older > Radeon: http

amdgpu kernel module won't load

I have these installed: kernel-modules-5.18.19-200.fc36.x86_64 kernel-modules-5.19.16-200.fc36.x86_64 kernel-modules-5.19.17-200.fc36.x86_64 on: # inxi -Gxx Graphics: Device-1: AMD Kaveri [Radeon R7 Graphics] vendor: ASRock driver: amdgpu v: kernel arch: GCN-2 ports: active: DP-1,DVI-D-1,H

Re: urgent problem: "NVIDIA kernel module missing..." [SOLVED]

On 1/1/22 2:27 AM, John Pilkington wrote: On 31/12/2021 23:01, home user wrote: Ed's solution, removing the old driver (dnf erase *nvidia*), then installing the correct driver (dnf install akmod-nvidia-470xx) worked. The problem arose when my weekly patches updated the working driver with a

Re: urgent problem: "NVIDIA kernel module missing..." [SOLVED]

On 31/12/2021 23:01, home user wrote: On 12/30/21 2:36 PM, home user wrote: (f34) I'm using my old windows-7 box to do e-mail. I did my weekly patches ("dnf upgrade") an hour ago.  After rebooting, after the rightmost rectangle turns white, I get the message "NVIDIA k

Re: urgent problem: "NVIDIA kernel module missing..." [SOLVED]

On 12/30/21 2:36 PM, home user wrote: (f34) I'm using my old windows-7 box to do e-mail. I did my weekly patches ("dnf upgrade") an hour ago.  After rebooting, after the rightmost rectangle turns white, I get the message "NVIDIA kernel module missing. Falling back to nouv

Re: urgent problem: "NVIDIA kernel module missing..."

On 12/30/21 8:03 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 31/12/2021 10:44, home user wrote: This brings me back to the first question I asked after the fix was installed: > In future weekly patching, will I have to do anything different? Won't the same thing happen every time (every Thursday) I do "dnf upg

Re: urgent problem: "NVIDIA kernel module missing..."

On 31/12/2021 10:44, home user wrote: This brings me back to the first question I asked after the fix was installed: > In future weekly patching, will I have to do anything different? Won't the same thing happen every time (every Thursday) I do "dnf upgrade", just like earlier today?  If yes, h

Re: urgent problem: "NVIDIA kernel module missing..."

On 12/30/21 7:14 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 31/12/2021 07:47, home user wrote: On 12/30/2021 2:36 PM, home user wrote: Using "Ext2explore", I was able to copy to my windows-7 admin account the logs from this afternoon's "dnf upgrade".  I chopped out everything from previous weeks' patching, ex

Re: urgent problem: "NVIDIA kernel module missing..."

On 31/12/2021 07:47, home user wrote: On 12/30/2021 2:36 PM, home user wrote: (f34) I'm using my old windows-7 box to do e-mail. I did my weekly patches ("dnf upgrade") an hour ago.  After rebooting, after the rightmost rectangle turns white, I get the message "NVIDIA k

Re: urgent problem: "NVIDIA kernel module missing..."

On 12/30/21 6:25 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On Fri, Dec 31, 2021, 08:27 home user > wrote: Wow.  It appears to have worked.  I feared this would be much messier. I did quick tests: on-line weather satellite picture, youtube video, watched downloaded video,

Re: urgent problem: "NVIDIA kernel module missing..."

On Fri, Dec 31, 2021, 08:27 home user wrote: > On 12/30/21 4:42 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > > > Yep, that's the problem. The 495 driver doesn't support the GTX 660 any > > longer. > > > > Use the "e" thing then. > > > > sudo dnf erase *nvidia* followed by > > sudo dnf install akmod-nvidia-470xx

Re: urgent problem: "NVIDIA kernel module missing..."

On 12/30/21 4:42 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: Yep, that's the problem.  The 495 driver doesn't support the GTX 660 any longer. Use the "e" thing then. sudo dnf erase *nvidia* followed by sudo dnf install akmod-nvidia-470xx Check the file /var/cache/akmods/akmods.log to make sure the drivers are

Re: urgent problem: "NVIDIA kernel module missing..."

ok, will do.  this will take some time. On 12/30/2021 4:42 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 31/12/2021 07:11, home user wrote: ok.  I did the 'e' thing.  I sent the output of the lspci and rpm commands to a text output file. After rebooting back to windows-7, I use the "Ext2explore" tool to look at th

Re: urgent problem: "NVIDIA kernel module missing..."

On 12/30/2021 2:36 PM, home user wrote: (f34) I'm using my old windows-7 box to do e-mail. I did my weekly patches ("dnf upgrade") an hour ago.  After rebooting, after the rightmost rectangle turns white, I get the message "NVIDIA kernel module missing. Falling back

Re: urgent problem: "NVIDIA kernel module missing..."

On 31/12/2021 07:11, home user wrote: ok.  I did the 'e' thing.  I sent the output of the lspci and rpm commands to a text output file.  After rebooting back to windows-7, I use the "Ext2explore" tool to look at the .txt file. Here are the contents of that filw: --- output from ls

Re: urgent problem: "NVIDIA kernel module missing..."

ting, after the rightmost rectangle turns white, I get the message "NVIDIA kernel module missing. Falling back to nouveau.". A few seconds later, the 3 rectangles turn orange. Then the screens go black and nothing further happens.  I have to use the reset button on the top of the to

Re: urgent problem: "NVIDIA kernel module missing..."

hite, I get the message "NVIDIA kernel module missing. Falling back to nouveau.". A few seconds later, the 3 rectangles turn orange. Then the screens go black and nothing further happens.  I have to use the reset button on the top of the tower.  The behavior is the same no matter which

Re: urgent problem: "NVIDIA kernel module missing..."

On 12/30/2021 3:08 PM, John Pilkington wrote: On 30/12/2021 21:36, home user wrote: (f34) I'm using my old windows-7 box to do e-mail. I did my weekly patches ("dnf upgrade") an hour ago.  After rebooting, after the rightmost rectangle turns white, I get the message "

Re: urgent problem: "NVIDIA kernel module missing..."

On 12/30/2021 2:54 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 31/12/2021 05:36, home user wrote: (f34) I'm using my old windows-7 box to do e-mail. I did my weekly patches ("dnf upgrade") an hour ago.  After rebooting, after the rightmost rectangle turns white, I get the message "NVIDIA k

Re: urgent problem: "NVIDIA kernel module missing..."

On 30/12/2021 21:36, home user wrote: (f34) I'm using my old windows-7 box to do e-mail. I did my weekly patches ("dnf upgrade") an hour ago.  After rebooting, after the rightmost rectangle turns white, I get the message "NVIDIA kernel module missing. Falling back to nouv

Re: urgent problem: "NVIDIA kernel module missing..."

On 31/12/2021 05:36, home user wrote: (f34) I'm using my old windows-7 box to do e-mail. I did my weekly patches ("dnf upgrade") an hour ago.  After rebooting, after the rightmost rectangle turns white, I get the message "NVIDIA kernel module missing. Falling back to nouv

urgent problem: "NVIDIA kernel module missing..."

(f34) I'm using my old windows-7 box to do e-mail. I did my weekly patches ("dnf upgrade") an hour ago.  After rebooting, after the rightmost rectangle turns white, I get the message "NVIDIA kernel module missing. Falling back to nouveau.". A few seconds later, the

Re: kernel module can't link to static lib.a on fedora 30.

saw a simular error month ago - can't find it anymore - the solution was to sudo dnf install glibc-static - don't know if it helps here too - ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedor

Re: kernel module can't link to static lib.a on fedora 30.

Work well on fedora 26, I think kbuild changed and not process ".a" files. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/

kernel module can't link to static lib.a on fedora 30.

Same to https://stackoverflow.com/questions/56926632/how-do-i-link-a-static-library-when-building-a-kernel-module lib.a is create by "3.5 Library file goals - lib-y" see "https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/tree/Documentation/kbuild/makefiles.rst&quo

Re: VMware player with Fedora 26 (kernel module not loaded)

k GCC, a working workaround is > to run with "/usr/lib/vmware/bin/vmplayer " command but when I loaded > *vmdk into VMware then I getting "Please make sure that the kernel > module `vmmon’ is loaded”" > > Tried both latest VMplayer 7 and 12. I still gettting the

VMware player with Fedora 26 (kernel module not loaded)

aded *vmdk into VMware then I getting "Please make sure that the kernel module `vmmon’ is loaded”" Tried both latest VMplayer 7 and 12. I still gettting the same error. I only have 2 kernel installed right now $ rpm -q kernel kernel-4.11.8-300.fc26.x86_64 kernel-4.12.8-300.fc26.x86_

Re: Looking for some help w/ F26 + TLP + acpi-call kernel module

> On 08/15/2017 10:22 PM, wgelpi(a)redhat.com wrote: > > > Those packages seem to be available only from the TLP repo and according to > http://linrunner.de/en/tlp/docs/tlp-linux-advanced-power-management.html > (scroll down > to Fedora) only available for F24 and F25. Yea. I was hoping they wo

Re: Looking for some help w/ F26 + TLP + acpi-call kernel module

On 08/15/2017 10:22 PM, wge...@redhat.com wrote: > I have TLP installed to extend battery life. I have a Lenovo T440s and I > have Fedora 26 installed. When I run TLP it recommends the installation of > the acpi-call kernel. When I follow directions here[1] it "works" until the > final step(s

Looking for some help w/ F26 + TLP + acpi-call kernel module

I have TLP installed to extend battery life. I have a Lenovo T440s and I have Fedora 26 installed. When I run TLP it recommends the installation of the acpi-call kernel. When I follow directions here[1] it "works" until the final step(s) of: dnf install akmod-tp_smapi akmod-acpi_call kernel-d

Re: compiling dahdi-linux kernel module

Quoting "Dr. Robert Marmorstein" : I've been working on this too, this week. I think I have it working from source but haven't finished testing yet. The source install wasn't really too bad, so I recommend it. The messinet rpms didn't work for me. Feel free to contact me offline to let

Re: compiling dahdi-linux kernel module

I've been working on this too, this week. I think I have it working from source but haven't finished testing yet. The source install wasn't really too bad, so I recommend it. The messinet rpms didn't work for me. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists

Re: compiling dahdi-linux kernel module

On 08/01/2017 09:31 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 08/01/2017 08:48 PM, Greg Woods wrote: >> >> On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 9:47 PM, Greg Woods > > wrote: >> >> >> >> On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Joe Zeff > > wrote: >> >> On 07/30/2017 01:54 PM, G

Re: compiling dahdi-linux kernel module

On 08/01/2017 08:48 PM, Greg Woods wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 9:47 PM, Greg Woods > wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Joe Zeff > wrote: > > On 07/30/2017 01:54 PM, Greg Woods wrote: > > It looks like some

Re: compiling dahdi-linux kernel module

On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 9:47 PM, Greg Woods wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: > >> On 07/30/2017 01:54 PM, Greg Woods wrote: >> >>> It looks like some warnings are being treated as errors, such as an >>> implicit function declaration in this case. Is there a way I can

Re: compiling dahdi-linux kernel module

On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 07/30/2017 01:54 PM, Greg Woods wrote: > >> It looks like some warnings are being treated as errors, such as an >> implicit function declaration in this case. Is there a way I can turn that >> off just long enough to get this module built? I'm

Re: compiling dahdi-linux kernel module

On 07/30/2017 02:40 PM, Greg Woods wrote: I suppose so, but "upstream" in this case is a hardware vendor, who is much less motivated to keep supporting a 10-year-old card than they are to sell new hardware. The last update to the module source was around March of 2016. Unfortunately telephony c

Re: compiling dahdi-linux kernel module

On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: > If they're going to supply a non-free kernel module, they'll have to > deal with the problems. > > I suppose so, but "upstream" in this case is a hardware vendor, who is much less motivated to keep support

Re: compiling dahdi-linux kernel module

7;re going to supply a non-free kernel module, they'll have to deal with the problems. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: compiling dahdi-linux kernel module

On 07/30/2017 01:54 PM, Greg Woods wrote: It looks like some warnings are being treated as errors, such as an implicit function declaration in this case. Is there a way I can turn that off just long enough to get this module built? I'm stuck running a non-updateable kernel until I can find a wa

compiling dahdi-linux kernel module

The dahdi kernel module (used by asterisk for some Digium telephony cards, including the one I have) is not included in Fedora because it is not free software. The dahdi configuration tools are included, but not the kernel module. The software is free as in beer, it can be downloaded and built

F22 no loading Virtuabox kernel module

ar "there ain't no kernel mod" error. Stuff I tried: I removed and reinstalled VirtualBox and it's associated kernel mod source (which seems present though the compiled kernel module doesn't seem to be there). Ran akmods, which noticed that VirtualBox kernel mod ne

Re: How do I prevent the kernel module i915 from being loaded?

On 08/08/2013 13:29, Heinz Diehl wrote: On 08.08.2013, Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote: I have already appended 'blacklist i915' to /lib/modprobe.d/dist-blacklist.conf but it is still being loaded. What else can I do? On the long run, you could disable all CONFIG_DRM_i91

Re: How do I prevent the kernel module i915 from being loaded?

On 08.08.2013, Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote: > I have already appended 'blacklist i915' to > /lib/modprobe.d/dist-blacklist.conf but it is still being loaded. What else > can I do? On the long run, you could disable all CONFIG_DRM_i915 options in your kernel .config and

Re: How do I prevent the kernel module i915 from being loaded?

Here's what worked for me. You might wish to try this: create /etc/modprobe.d//blacklist-i915.conf with contents "blacklist i915" On 08/07/2013 07:37:18 AM, Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote: > On 07/08/2013 22:34, Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) > wrote: >

Re: How do I prevent the kernel module i915 from being loaded?

On 07/08/2013 22:34, Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote: Hi, I have already appended 'blacklist i915' to /lib/modprobe.d/dist-blacklist.conf but it is still being loaded. What else can I do? Please advise. Thank you very much. Hi, Please note that I am using Fedora 19

How do I prevent the kernel module i915 from being loaded?

Hi, I have already appended 'blacklist i915' to /lib/modprobe.d/dist-blacklist.conf but it is still being loaded. What else can I do? Please advise. Thank you very much. -- Yours sincerely, Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.or

Re: Does the nouveau kernel module support 3D video hardware acceleration?

Ian Chapman writes: > On 10/11/12 22:38, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > >>> >>> I tried it and got only about 1/7 of the FPS I get with the drivers from >>> NVIDIA, so it's not really an option (unless you have a really fast card >>> and want to waste it maybe). >> >> Well, it's not really an option if

Re: Does the nouveau kernel module support 3D video hardware acceleration?

On 10/11/12 22:38, Sam Varshavchik wrote: I tried it and got only about 1/7 of the FPS I get with the drivers from NVIDIA, so it's not really an option (unless you have a really fast card and want to waste it maybe). Well, it's not really an option if your needs are, primarily, to play shoot-

Re: Does the nouveau kernel module support 3D video hardware acceleration?

Sam Varshavchik writes: > lee writes: > >> Sam Varshavchik writes: >> >> > Bruno Wolff III writes: >> > >> >> On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 00:30:11 +0800, >> >> "Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)" wrote: >> >>> Hi, >> >>> >> >>> I am wondering if the nouveau driver supports 3D video hardware >> >>> accel

Re: Does the nouveau kernel module support 3D video hardware acceleration?

lee writes: Sam Varshavchik writes: > Bruno Wolff III writes: > >> On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 00:30:11 +0800, >> "Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)" wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am wondering if the nouveau driver supports 3D video hardware >>> acceleration or only 2D video acceleration. >> >> It supports

Re: Does the nouveau kernel module support 3D video hardware acceleration?

Sam Varshavchik writes: > Bruno Wolff III writes: > >> On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 00:30:11 +0800, >> "Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)" wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am wondering if the nouveau driver supports 3D video hardware >>> acceleration or only 2D video acceleration. >> >> It supports 3D acceleratio

Re: Does the nouveau kernel module support 3D video hardware acceleration?

Bruno Wolff III writes: On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 00:30:11 +0800, "Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)" wrote: Hi, I am wondering if the nouveau driver supports 3D video hardware acceleration or only 2D video acceleration. It supports 3D acceleration. Not on all Nvidia chipsets. http://nouveau.

Re: Does the nouveau kernel module support 3D video hardware acceleration?

--- Em ter, 6/11/12, Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) escreveu: > De: Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) > Assunto: Does the nouveau kernel module support 3D video hardware > acceleration? > Para: "Community support for Fedora users" , > "Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)"

Re: Does the nouveau kernel module support 3D video hardware acceleration?

Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 00:30:11 +0800, >"Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)" wrote: >>Hi, >> >>I am wondering if the nouveau driver supports 3D video hardware >>acceleration or only 2D video acceleration. > > It supports 3D acceleration. But performance of nvidia driver is

Re: Does the nouveau kernel module support 3D video hardware acceleration?

On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 00:30:11 +0800, "Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)" wrote: Hi, I am wondering if the nouveau driver supports 3D video hardware acceleration or only 2D video acceleration. It supports 3D acceleration. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or cha

Does the nouveau kernel module support 3D video hardware acceleration?

Hi, I am wondering if the nouveau driver supports 3D video hardware acceleration or only 2D video acceleration. Please advise. Thank you very much. -- Yours sincerely, Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) Singapore -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subs

Re: FC17 does not include SCTP kernel module

On 05/31/2012 12:42 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > # yum install kernel-modules-extra > Which brings up an interesting question. [root@meimei ~]# uname -r 3.3.7-1.fc16.i686.PAE [root@meimei ~]# yum install kernel-PAE-modules-extra Loaded plugins: downloadonly, langpacks, presto, refresh-pa

Re: FC17 does not include SCTP kernel module

Thanks Michael, I am now up and running with SCTP! -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away:

Re: FC17 does not include SCTP kernel module

Peter Butler wrote: > (1) The system I am installing to does not have direct Internet access and > thus cannot do a 'yum' to an external repository. I can only install > what's on the FC17 DVD ISO or via RPM (that I download from a separate > machine). I do not know if kernel-modules-extra is on

Re: FC17 does not include SCTP kernel module

A couple of issues with that - hopefully not a big deal: (1) The system I am installing to does not have direct Internet access and thus cannot do a 'yum' to an external repository. I can only install what's on the FC17 DVD ISO or via RPM (that I download from a separate machine). (2) My arch is

Re: FC17 does not include SCTP kernel module

Peter Butler wrote: > FC17 does not include the SCTP kernel module, as it had before (i.e. in > FC16 etc.) > > I can't find the FC17 kernel-modules-extra RPM for it, nor even the FC17 > kernel source RPM to compile it myself! First off, please send plain-text e-mail. The S

FC17 does not include SCTP kernel module

FC17 does not include the SCTP kernel module, as it had before (i.e. in FC16 etc.) I can't find the FC17 kernel-modules-extra RPM for it, nor even the FC17 kernel source RPM to compile it myself! Help! Peter Butler Software Engineer Performance Technologies 40 Hines Road, Suite 500 O

Re: ...kernel module signing on x86??? Why?

> I hope the developers reconsider the decision to put extra "locks" > where they are not needed at all. a) module signing is just a feature you can use if you want b) it's not really a lock. It's only a lock if you decide to enforce module signature checking and not add any keys of your own c)

Re: ...kernel module signing on x86??? Why?

2012/3/10 Joel Rees : > On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Joshua C. wrote: >> 2012/3/9 Alan Cox : >>> >>> So you can stop a third party tampering with the modules on your system, >>> while keeping the ability to do so yourself. It's all about who owns the >>> keys. If you own the keys it becomes a u

Re: ...kernel module signing on x86??? Why?

On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Joshua C. wrote: > 2012/3/9 Alan Cox : >> >> So you can stop a third party tampering with the modules on your system, >> while keeping the ability to do so yourself. It's all about who owns the >> keys. If you own the keys it becomes a useful security feature to som

Re: ...kernel module signing on x86??? Why?

2012/3/9 Alan Cox : > > So you can stop a third party tampering with the modules on your system, > while keeping the ability to do so yourself. It's all about who owns the > keys. If you own the keys it becomes a useful security feature to some > users. > > Alan Put in other words: You cannot do a

Re: ...kernel module signing on x86??? Why?

> I fully agree with you but the question is "Why should we do this on > linux?" Let the windoof people do whatever they want... You see that > the module signing is more a less a measure against the so called > "windows OEM-SLP activation with modded bootloaders". I don't see any > benefit for lin

Re: ...kernel module signing on x86??? Why?

2012/3/9 Alan Cox : > On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 11:07:55 +0100 ... > will be locked down by default and require some undefined > screwing around to unlock. For x86 the spec currently does require they > can be unlocked... ... > Module signing itself isn't just useful for that though - its a matter of > wh

Re: ...kernel module signing on x86??? Why?

On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 11:07:55 +0100 "Joshua C." wrote: > I saw that the x86 modules can (_should_) be signed int the future. We > all know the pros and cons of signing but I'm wondering if all this > _crap_ has anything to do with the microsoft's idea to use a signed > bootloader, drivers, etc in t

...kernel module signing on x86??? Why?

I saw that the x86 modules can (_should_) be signed int the future. We all know the pros and cons of signing but I'm wondering if all this _crap_ has anything to do with the microsoft's idea to use a signed bootloader, drivers, etc in the latest windoof 8. I think all of you have heard that there's

Re: OT:How to disable a built-in kernel module?

On 15 Oct 2010 at 18:30, Bryn M. Reeves wrote: Date sent: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 18:30:01 +0100 From: "Bryn M. Reeves" To: Community support for Fedora users Subject:Re: OT:How to disable a built-in kernel module? > On

Re: OT:How to disable a built-in kernel module?

On 10/15/2010 06:21 PM, Konstantin Svist wrote: > On 10/15/2010 02:33 AM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote: >> I have a project in which I build most nic and disk modules into the kernel >> file >> so it will support hardware with any of the devices. In most cases this works >> just fine with the kern

Re: OT:How to disable a built-in kernel module?

On 10/15/2010 02:33 AM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote: > I have a project in which I build most nic and disk modules into the kernel > file > so it will support hardware with any of the devices. In most cases this works > just fine with the kernel only loading the correct ones. But rarely, it stops

OT:How to disable a built-in kernel module?

I have a project in which I build most nic and disk modules into the kernel file so it will support hardware with any of the devices. In most cases this works just fine with the kernel only loading the correct ones. But rarely, it stops on a module that is not in the hardware. The latest one i

Re: Recompiling VirtualBox kernel module [FAILED]

ualisation better. there is the kqemu kernel module in rpmfusion that > will give you accelerated virtualisation using tools that are native in fedora > for the rest. I bring it up because it seems vmware and virtual box regularly > break because there kernel modules don't build and yo

Re: Recompiling VirtualBox kernel module [FAILED]

t accelerated support using kqemu from rpmfusion. it is there as its a kernel module. and you should see a good performance increase. > > On the Core Duo at work, which does have hardware virtualization, KVM > performance is good, but the VM crashes as soon as I access it in the > mor

Re: Recompiling VirtualBox kernel module [FAILED]

On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 11:14 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > its a amd specific flag that signifies hardware virtualisation. intels is > vmx so > you would run "cat /proc/cpuinfo |grep vmx" if you get a result you have > hardware virtulaisation in your cpu. it could still be disabled in the

Re: Recompiling VirtualBox kernel module [FAILED]

On Friday 09 April 2010 09:22:44 am Greg Woods wrote: > On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 08:15 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > what do you get for "cat /proc/cpuinfo |grep svm" what model cpus do you > > have? > > No output at all. Dual core Pentium 4: > > model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) Dual CPU

Re: Recompiling VirtualBox kernel module [FAILED]

On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 08:15 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > what do you get for "cat /proc/cpuinfo |grep svm" what model cpus do you > have? No output at all. Dual core Pentium 4: model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) Dual CPU E2180 @ 2.00GHz > it seems vmware and virtual box regularly >

Re: Recompiling VirtualBox kernel module [FAILED]

evel-2.6.32.10-90.fc12.x86_64 > >> kernel-devel-2.6.32.9-70.fc12.x86_64 > >> > >> it says > >> > >> sudo /etc/init.d/vboxdrv setup > >> Stopping VirtualBox kernel module [ OK ] > >> Recompiling VirtualBox k

Re: Recompiling VirtualBox kernel module [FAILED]

2.6.32.9-70.fc12.x86_64 >> kernel-firmware-2.6.32.10-90.fc12.noarch >> abrt-addon-kerneloops-1.0.8-2.fc12.x86_64 >> kernel-headers-2.6.32.10-90.fc12.x86_64 >> kernel-devel-2.6.32.10-90.fc12.x86_64 >> kernel-devel-2.6.32.9-70.fc12.x86_64 >> >> it say

Re: Recompiling VirtualBox kernel module [FAILED]

on 04/08/2010 03:36 PM Kwan Lowe wrote: > This thread has a fix: > http://www.mail-archive.com/vbox-us...@virtualbox.org/msg07263.html > > In short, you're adding a one line change to a file (including sched.h). thanks, it worked. -- regards, Oleksandr Korneta I'm running F12 x86_64, should th

Re: Recompiling VirtualBox kernel module [FAILED]

Greg Woods wrote: >On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 15:34 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >> Im curious why you use virtualbox and not kvm/libvirt/virt-manager that are >> included by default in fedora? Im just trying to work out what is lacking >> in >> the default offerings that you go to a third party. >

Re: Recompiling VirtualBox kernel module [FAILED]

On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 15:34 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > Im curious why you use virtualbox and not kvm/libvirt/virt-manager that are > included by default in fedora? Im just trying to work out what is lacking in > the default offerings that you go to a third party. I can't speak for the o

Re: Recompiling VirtualBox kernel module [FAILED]

abrt-addon-kerneloops-1.0.8-2.fc12.x86_64 > kernel-headers-2.6.32.10-90.fc12.x86_64 > kernel-devel-2.6.32.10-90.fc12.x86_64 > kernel-devel-2.6.32.9-70.fc12.x86_64 > > it says > > sudo /etc/init.d/vboxdrv setup > Stopping VirtualBox kernel module [

Re: Recompiling VirtualBox kernel module [FAILED]

6_64 > kernel-headers-2.6.32.10-90.fc12.x86_64 > kernel-devel-2.6.32.10-90.fc12.x86_64 > kernel-devel-2.6.32.9-70.fc12.x86_64 > > it says > > sudo /etc/init.d/vboxdrv setup > Stopping VirtualBox kernel module                          [  OK  ] > Recompiling VirtualBox kerne

Recompiling VirtualBox kernel module [FAILED]

-2.6.32.10-90.fc12.x86_64 kernel-devel-2.6.32.9-70.fc12.x86_64 it says sudo /etc/init.d/vboxdrv setup Stopping VirtualBox kernel module [ OK ] Recompiling VirtualBox kernel module [FAILED] (Look at /var/log/vbox-install.log to find out what went wrong

Re: How to compile kernel module for a new kernel before reboot?

On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 08:21:34PM +0100, Sam Sharpe wrote: > FWIW, DKMS doesn't normally pre-build the module, it builds it on > first boot into the kernel - so it's not exactly what you want. There is now a kernel install-time hook, such that when a new kernel is installed, DKMS can build its mo

Re: How to compile kernel module for a new kernel before reboot?

Hello Kwan, Saturday, April 3, 2010, 11:57:04 PM, you wrote: >> How do I compile my driver for a new kernel _before_ actually booting >> into that new kernel, so that I could be prepared with the new kernel >> module already on first reboot? > Depending on your source

Re: How to compile kernel module for a new kernel before reboot?

Hello Sam, Saturday, April 3, 2010, 11:21:34 PM, you wrote: >> How do I compile my driver for a new kernel _before_ actually booting >> into that new kernel, so that I could be prepared with the new kernel >> module already on first reboot? > My advice is to investigate wh

Re: How to compile kernel module for a new kernel before reboot?

hink it's > not there). > > So whenever I do a 'yum update' and get a new kernel, I have to > compile a new kernel module as well. Currently, I first reboot to a > new kernel, then compile a module and then do another reboot just to > check everything is loading prop

Re: How to compile kernel module for a new kernel before reboot?

re). > > So whenever I do a 'yum update' and get a new kernel, I have to > compile a new kernel module as well. Currently, I first reboot to a > new kernel, then compile a module and then do another reboot just to > check everything is loading properly on bootup. > > How do

Re: How to compile kernel module for a new kernel before reboot?

t, so I think it's > not there). > > So whenever I do a 'yum update' and get a new kernel, I have to > compile a new kernel module as well. Currently, I first reboot to a > new kernel, then compile a module and then do another reboot just to > check everything is loadin

How to compile kernel module for a new kernel before reboot?

nd get a new kernel, I have to compile a new kernel module as well. Currently, I first reboot to a new kernel, then compile a module and then do another reboot just to check everything is loading properly on bootup. How do I compile my driver for a new kernel _before_ actually booting into that new kerne

Re: kernel module

On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 09:55 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jan 2010, Luca wrote: > > What I would like to do now, is to use grub and do something like > > ttile Fedora > > root (hd1,0) > > kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.30.9 ro root=/dev/ > > mymodule.param="valueOfParam" > >

Re: fc12 create initramfs contaning twofish kernel module

> > I think the idea there was to pick something reasonable and not provide a > > way for people to shoot themselves in the foot. If you really care, you > > can set up the luks devices before doing the install and you should be able > > to use them by supplying the key for them. > > In a way I di

  1   2   >