Re: holding a package

2013-01-20 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 20.01.2013 19:17, schrieb Frank McCormick: > On 01/20/2013 09:36 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> >> Am 20.01.2013 15:31, schrieb Frank McCormick: >>> >>> I have compiled from source GThumb, as Fedoras package wouldn't run on my >>> machine. My compiled version is fine. I >>> am now concerned Y

Re: holding a package

2013-01-20 Thread Frank McCormick
On 01/20/2013 09:36 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 20.01.2013 15:31, schrieb Frank McCormick: I have compiled from source GThumb, as Fedoras package wouldn't run on my machine. My compiled version is fine. I am now concerned Yum will replace my version with Fedoras the next time GThumb is upda

Re: holding a package

2013-01-20 Thread Frank McCormick
On 01/20/2013 09:54 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote: On Sun, 20 Jan 2013 15:36:46 +0100 Reindl Harald wrote: Am 20.01.2013 15:31, schrieb Frank McCormick: I have compiled from source GThumb, as Fedoras package wouldn't run on my machine. My compiled version is fine. I am now concerned Yum will re

Re: holding a package

2013-01-20 Thread Frank McCormick
On 01/20/2013 09:44 AM, Frank Murphy wrote: On Sun, 20 Jan 2013 09:31:36 -0500 Frank McCormick wrote: I have compiled from source GThumb, as Fedoras package wouldn't run on my machine. Did you create bugzillas? Yes, but the problem seems to only affect certain older Intel chipse

Re: holding a package

2013-01-20 Thread Ranjan Maitra
On Sun, 20 Jan 2013 15:36:46 +0100 Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 20.01.2013 15:31, schrieb Frank McCormick: > > > > I have compiled from source GThumb, as Fedoras package wouldn't run on my > > machine. My compiled version is fine. I > > am now concerned Yum will replace my version with Fedor

Re: holding a package

2013-01-20 Thread Frank Murphy
On Sun, 20 Jan 2013 09:31:36 -0500 Frank McCormick wrote: > >I have compiled from source GThumb, as Fedoras package wouldn't > run on my machine. Did you create bugzillas? -- Regards, Frank "Ask not what Fedora can do for you, but what you can do for Fedora"

Re: holding a package

2013-01-20 Thread Tom Horsley
On Sun, 20 Jan 2013 09:31:36 -0500 Frank McCormick wrote: > Is there a way to put GThumb on hold using Yum ? You can put an exclude= line in /etc/yum.conf to exclude packages from being updated, or you can yum erase the fedora gthumb rpm. Both of these techniques have problems of course if there

Re: holding a package

2013-01-20 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 20.01.2013 15:31, schrieb Frank McCormick: > > I have compiled from source GThumb, as Fedoras package wouldn't run on my > machine. My compiled version is fine. I > am now concerned Yum will replace my version with Fedoras the next time > GThumb is updated. > Is there a way to put GThumb on

holding a package

2013-01-20 Thread Frank McCormick
I have compiled from source GThumb, as Fedoras package wouldn't run on my machine. My compiled version is fine. I am now concerned Yum will replace my version with Fedoras the next time GThumb is updated. Is there a way to put GThumb on hold using Yum ? Thanks -- --Cheers-- -- users maili