esn't use gpg itself, but it's highly likely libdnf is
doing something with GPG which PK does use.
Unfortunately gpg2 has been turned into a "desktop" tool and there is no sane
way
to run it in batch jobs. It will spawn a background gpg-agent that will silently
learn, keep and u
On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 14:24, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> I'm running f33beta, bu I have also seen these, they're owned by the
> packagekit systemd service (confirm by running 'cat /proc/2512/cgroup'
> in your example).
PackageKit doesn't use gpg itself, but it's highly likely libdnf is
doing some
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 11:30:05AM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> Has anyone seen the following before and possibly has found out what
> is going on?
>
> Fedora 32 shows a gpg-agent process for each repo but with a
> non-existant ".tmp" homedir.
> Examples:
Has anyone seen the following before and possibly has found out what is going
on?
Fedora 32 shows a gpg-agent process for each repo but with a non-existant
".tmp" homedir.
Examples:
root2512 0.0 0.0 161028 900 ?Ss 11:20 0:00 gpg-agent
--homedir /var/cache/Pac
Christopher writes:
> Fedora ships with both gpg and gpg2. Most things seem to work fine
> out of the box with gpg2, but many apps call "gpg" instead of "gpg2".
Ahh, forgot about gpg…
> It looks like that's the case with the default value for fossil's
> pgp-command setting: "gpg --clearsign -o
On 11/15/2016 12:35 PM, Christopher wrote:
I had a similar issue with git. I had to set my gpg.program to gpg2 for
things to work correctly. Fedora ships with both gpg and gpg2. Most
things seem to work fine out of the box with gpg2, but many apps call
"gpg" instead of "gpg2". It looks like that
entry-gtk
> #allow-emacs-pinentry
> #no-grab
> default-cache-ttl 86400
> allow-loopback-pinentry
>
> and I’ve installed both pinentry-{gtk,gnome3}, but none is launched.
>
> gpg-agent is now running as:
>
> [gour@atmarama ~]$ ps ax | grep gpg-agent
> 2521 ?
On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 19:13 +0100, Saša Janiška wrote:
> I’m running Fedora f25-beta and have problem that I’ve to repeatedly
> enter my gpg password whenever I e.g. commit with Fossil (DVCS).
F25 has not yet been released. Please post to the Fedora Test list.
poc
and I’ve installed both pinentry-{gtk,gnome3}, but none is launched.
gpg-agent is now running as:
[gour@atmarama ~]$ ps ax | grep gpg-agent
2521 ?Ss 0:01 gpg-agent --homedir /home/gour/.gnupg
--use-standard-socket --daemon
8573 ?Ss 0:00 gpg-agent --homedir \
/var/cache
bkey that is
> located on my Yubikey Neo.
>
> I have a systemd unit starting the gpg-agent as following:
>
>
> /usr/bin/gpg-agent --homedir=%h/.gnupg --daemon --use-standard-socket
>
>
> And I have enabled SSH support in the configuration:
>
>
> enable-ssh-
Hello,
I'm running Fedora 22. I'm trying to setup GnuPG to have my SSH
connections authenticated using my PGP authentication subkey that is
located on my Yubikey Neo.
I have a systemd unit starting the gpg-agent as following:
/usr/bin/gpg-agent --homedir=%h/.gnupg --daemon --us
I mentioned. I am never prompted for my
passphrase from kwallet.
I am prompted, and expect to be prompted, when doing things such as signing
this email as that is done via the gpg-agent.
--
If you can't laugh at yourself, others will gladly oblige.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPG
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> But that is not the case with the setting and the way I use it.
Are you using gpg-encrypted or the bluefish-algorithm-encrypted kwallet?
Things will be pretty swifty once pam-kwallet along with 4.13 come to
stable repositories. KDM will be ab
a login session.
> In a gpg-encrypted kwallet, as along as gpg-agent can keep gpg key
> unlocked, it can unlock the kwallet right away even if it locks
> itself. Does that make sense.
That would be true, and make sense *if* the wallet were being closed and opened
again. But that is not the ca
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> First, when it comes to gpg-agent, I believe the cache time for the
> passphrase is determined by --default-cache-ttl which defaults to 600
> seconds. This can be changed on a per-user basis in the
> ~/.gnupg/gpg-agent.conf fi
On 07/16/14 00:43, Sudhir Khanger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering if gpg-agent on your system keeps the keys unlocked
> for the session.
>
> My experience is that it doesn't. According to the documentation, the
> passphrase cache would be removed in 2 hours [1].
&g
Hello,
I was wondering if gpg-agent on your system keeps the keys unlocked
for the session.
My experience is that it doesn't. According to the documentation, the
passphrase cache would be removed in 2 hours [1].
I am using gpg encrypted KWallet and according to KWallet's upstream
dev
s I've read mentions setting up gpg-agent for KMail to ask for a
pass phrase, but it still does this without me completing this part. My
earlier attempts has also failed getting KMail to talk to gpg-agent or ask for
a passphrase - failing with an empty passphrase.
Does Enigmail do some black ma
El 2013-08-23 07:19, Juan Orti Alcaine escribió:
El 2013-08-22 20:18, Martin S escribió:
As I understand it the file gpg-agent-startup.sh should be placed in
/etc/kde/env and made executable for the gpg-agent to start att boot
time?
Agent is also enabled in the ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf
Running the
El 2013-08-22 20:18, Martin S escribió:
As I understand it the file gpg-agent-startup.sh should be placed in
/etc/kde/env and made executable for the gpg-agent to start att boot
time?
Agent is also enabled in the ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf
Running the file manually it starts the agent, but after
On Friday, August 23, 2013 01:00:35 AM Raman Gupta wrote:
> On 08/23/2013 12:50 AM, Martin S wrote:
> > I get this too, but one issue remains.
> > Does the value GPGKEYS take 2 keys? I tried seperating the with " " and
> > ","
> > and both fails. As well as having two lines, but it only reads the f
On 08/23/2013 12:50 AM, Martin S wrote:
> I get this too, but one issue remains.
> Does the value GPGKEYS take 2 keys? I tried seperating the with " " and ","
> and both fails. As well as having two lines, but it only reads the first.
According to README.Fedora, you can specify multiple keys, spa
On Thursday, August 22, 2013 11:58:29 PM Raman Gupta wrote:
> On 08/22/2013 11:48 PM, Martin S wrote:
> > On Thursday, August 22, 2013 05:16:57 PM Raman Gupta wrote:
> >> On 08/22/2013 04:18 PM, Martin S wrote:
> >>> As I understand it the file gpg-agent-startup.sh
On 08/22/2013 11:48 PM, Martin S wrote:
> On Thursday, August 22, 2013 05:16:57 PM Raman Gupta wrote:
>> On 08/22/2013 04:18 PM, Martin S wrote:
>>> As I understand it the file gpg-agent-startup.sh should be placed in
>>> /etc/kde/env and made executable for the gpg-a
On Thursday, August 22, 2013 05:16:57 PM Raman Gupta wrote:
> On 08/22/2013 04:18 PM, Martin S wrote:
> > As I understand it the file gpg-agent-startup.sh should be placed in
> > /etc/kde/env and made executable for the gpg-agent to start att boot time?
> > Agent is also en
On Thursday, August 22, 2013 01:55:26 PM Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 08/22/2013 01:18 PM, Martin S wrote:
> > Where should that file be place to be run at startup?
>
> My guess (and it's only that) is that you should create
> gpg-agent.service and enable it. Either that, or invoke the script from
> /etc
On 08/22/2013 04:18 PM, Martin S wrote:
> As I understand it the file gpg-agent-startup.sh should be placed in
> /etc/kde/env and made executable for the gpg-agent to start att boot time?
> Agent is also enabled in the ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf
>
> Running the file manually it starts
On 08/22/2013 01:18 PM, Martin S wrote:
Where should that file be place to be run at startup?
My guess (and it's only that) is that you should create
gpg-agent.service and enable it. Either that, or invoke the script from
/etc/rc.local, after making sure that rc.local.service is enabled. Of
As I understand it the file gpg-agent-startup.sh should be placed in
/etc/kde/env and made executable for the gpg-agent to start att boot time?
Agent is also enabled in the ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf
Running the file manually it starts the agent, but after having booted, the
gpg-agent isn't starte
On Sun, 9 Dec 2012 16:12:11 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
> When I used to maintain Node.js packages for Fedora, I always ran
> `rpmsign --addsign` after a plain rpmbuild without the --sign. Doing
> it this way only requires entry of the password once as long you pass
> a glob to rpmsign, and
o get properly signed RPMs at the end - however,
> despite
> running gpg-agent, rpmbuild keeps asking for my (lengthy) GPG-passphrase
> every
> single time it is finished with a spec-file. This can be particularly
> annoying
> when building very large packages, because, instead of a
;
> It mostly works - I do get properly signed RPMs at the end - however, despite
> running gpg-agent, rpmbuild keeps asking for my (lengthy) GPG-passphrase
> every
> single time it is finished with a spec-file. This can be particularly
> annoying
> when building very large pac
Hi,
I'm trying to package some software with rpmbuild and signing the packages at
the same time. I'm following the guide found here:
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/l-rpm3/
It mostly works - I do get properly signed RPMs at the end - however, despite
running gpg-agent
On 30.08.2012, Maurizio Marini wrote:
> `gpg-agent --daemon`
> or, with f17, something different should be configured?
That will be sufficient. However, you could let the agent write
GPG_AGENT_INFO into a file, to inform other programs/processes about
it (esp. kmail). See "--wri
o chmod +x):
#!/bin/sh eval
`gpg-agent --daemon`
[/code]
or, with f17, something different should be configured?
br
m.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription opti
On 03/31/2010 08:26 AM, Mail Lists wrote:
> On 03/30/2010 06:23 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>> This is F11, KDE.
>>
>> Seems gpg-agent is hosed for one user. I think it may have to do with
>> the cache for the private key.
>>
> ...
>
>
>
On 03/30/2010 06:23 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> This is F11, KDE.
>
> Seems gpg-agent is hosed for one user. I think it may have to do with
> the cache for the private key.
>
> I get the following
>
> egres...@meimei .gnupg]$ /usr/bin/gpg --charset utf8 --batch --n
On 03/30/2010 06:23 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> This is F11, KDE.
>
> Seems gpg-agent is hosed for one user. I think it may have to do with
> the cache for the private key.
...
> I get the feeling there is a corrupt file...or stuck filefrom what I
> can tell gpg-agent interf
This is F11, KDE.
Seems gpg-agent is hosed for one user. I think it may have to do with
the cache for the private key.
I get the following
egres...@meimei .gnupg]$ /usr/bin/gpg --charset utf8 --batch --no-tty
--status-fd 2 -t --clearsign -u \ --use-agent
[GNUPG:] USERID_HINT
39 matches
Mail list logo
