On 6/8/25 2:36 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
Subject: Re: gparted
On 6/8/25 1:28 AM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
Thank for the feedback.
I did not try because Todd gave an easier option.
However, I also have an issue with gnome-terminal
For example,it does not "wrok" betwee
> Subject: Re: gparted
>
> On 6/8/25 1:28 AM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> > Thank for the feedback.
> > I did not try because Todd gave an easier option.
> > However, I also have an issue with gnome-terminal
> > For example,it does not "wrok" be
On 6/8/25 1:28 AM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
Thank for the feedback.
I did not try because Todd gave an easier option.
However, I also have an issue with gnome-terminal
For example,it does not "wrok" between 2 fedora machines.
/usr/bin/gnome-terminal
does not open a new terminal (not complai
On Sun, 08 Jun 2025 10:45:05 +0200 francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote:
> A more proper way to use sudo for that is thus:
> XAUTHORITY=${XAUTHORITY:-~/.Xauthority} sudo su root -c gparted
> Ie: use su to properly forward the xauth keys.
Note that this still assumes that root has access to
Hi.
On Sun, 08 Jun 2025 09:58:55 +0200 Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
>> I can get gparted to work after I "su" to root on
>> the remote machine. (I see you used "sudo".)
> It works.
Right. This is because su forwards (properly) the xauth keys. It do
y, June 08, 2025 at 12:21 AM
From: "Will McDonald"
To: "Community support for Fedora users"
Cc: "Patrick Dupre"
Subject: Re: gparted
On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 at 20:05, Patrick Dupre via users <users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
After ssh -X on a remote mac
Am 08.06.2025 um 09:58:55 Uhr schrieb Patrick Dupre via users:
> However, what is the "-t" for ?
> man ssh does not provide this option
Debian's manpage has it:
-t Force pseudo-terminal allocation. This can be used to
execute arbitrary screen-based programs on a remote mach
Thank.
It works.
However, what is the "-t" for ?
man ssh does not provide this option
> Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2025 at 5:12 AM
> From: "ToddAndMargo via users"
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Cc: "ToddAndMargo"
> Subject: Re: gparted
>
>
On 6/7/25 12:04 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
Hello,
After ssh -X on a remote machine
If I tried to run
sudo gparted
I get
X11 connection rejected because of wrong authentication.
while I can sudo on this machine.
It it specific to gparted ?
Thank
On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 at 20:05, Patrick Dupre via users <
users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> After ssh -X on a remote machine
> If I tried to run
>
> sudo gparted
> I get
> X11 connection rejected because of wrong authentication.
>
> while I can sudo on this
Am 07.06.2025 um 21:04:31 Uhr schrieb Patrick Dupre via users:
> X11 connection rejected because of wrong authentication.
>
> while I can sudo on this machine.
X11 uses a Cookie to authenticate.
> It it specific to gparted ?
Did you use gparted or gparted-root, which exists on
Hello,
After ssh -X on a remote machine
If I tried to run
sudo gparted
I get
X11 connection rejected because of wrong authentication.
while I can sudo on this machine.
It it specific to gparted ?
Thank.
===
Patrick
Hi All,
GParted may be supporting LUKS partitions in the near
future. Yippee!
-T
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=627701
Comment # 71 on bug 627701 from Mike Fleetwood
Raised Bug 795617 "Implement opening and closing of LUKS
mappings" to capture code changes for the ne
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016, 4:32 AM antonio montagnani
> Tnx for your comment, as I filed the new ticket that is similar to the
> old one and I didn't detect it.
> Looking forward to a solution in a Wayland and not for a workaround :-)
>
blivet-gui works on Wayland, is in the default repo.
Chris Mu
Michael Schwendt ha scritto il 16/12/2016 alle 12:22:
On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 12:03:02 +0100, antonio montagnani wrote:
When I start Gparted, after the password request window nothing happens.
If started in a terminal I get:
gparted
Created symlink /run/systemd/system/-.mount → /dev/null
On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 12:03:02 +0100, antonio montagnani wrote:
> When I start Gparted, after the password request window nothing happens.
> If started in a terminal I get:
>
> gparted
> Created symlink /run/systemd/system/-.mount → /dev/null.
> Created symlink /run/systemd/sys
When I start Gparted, after the password request window nothing happens.
If started in a terminal I get:
gparted
Created symlink /run/systemd/system/-.mount → /dev/null.
Created symlink /run/systemd/system/boot-efi.mount → /dev/null.
Created symlink /run/systemd/system/boot.mount → /dev/null
On 10/22/2015 03:21 AM, jd1008 wrote:
> # gparted
> Failed to execute operation: Access denied
> ==
> libparted : 3.2
> ==
>
> I did not perform any operations, and no operations were pending.
> There are 3 drives: sda sdb sdc
On 23Oct2015 14:25, jd1008 wrote:
On 10/21/2015 07:48 PM, jd1008 wrote:
On 10/21/2015 07:35 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
Hmm. It looks like this message comes from a subcommand that gparted
invokes, or a subprocess before executing the subcommand.
See here:
access("/bin/systemctl&q
On 10/21/2015 07:48 PM, jd1008 wrote:
On 10/21/2015 07:35 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 21Oct2015 18:39, jd1008 wrote:
On 10/21/2015 03:57 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 21Oct2015 13:21, jd1008 wrote:
# gparted
Failed to execute operation: Access denied
==
libparted
On 10/21/2015 07:35 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 21Oct2015 18:39, jd1008 wrote:
On 10/21/2015 03:57 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 21Oct2015 13:21, jd1008 wrote:
# gparted
Failed to execute operation: Access denied
==
libparted : 3.2
==
I did not
On 21Oct2015 18:39, jd1008 wrote:
On 10/21/2015 03:57 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 21Oct2015 13:21, jd1008 wrote:
# gparted
Failed to execute operation: Access denied
==
libparted : 3.2
==
I did not perform any operations, and no operations were
On 10/21/2015 03:57 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 21Oct2015 13:21, jd1008 wrote:
# gparted
Failed to execute operation: Access denied
==
libparted : 3.2
==
I did not perform any operations, and no operations were pending.
There are 3 drives: sda sdb
On 21Oct2015 13:21, jd1008 wrote:
# gparted
Failed to execute operation: Access denied
==
libparted : 3.2
==
I did not perform any operations, and no operations were pending.
There are 3 drives: sda sdb sdc
Selecting File->quit
belches out
Failed
# gparted
Failed to execute operation: Access denied
==
libparted : 3.2
==
I did not perform any operations, and no operations were pending.
There are 3 drives: sda sdb sdc
Selecting File->quit
belches out
Failed to execute operation: Access denied
On 11.09.2012, Tom Horsley wrote:
> Or is that too easy, and something I can't think of
> might go horribly wrong (which is why I ask :-)?
The only thing I can think of by now is something like WDs "advanced
format", that the drive uses 512/4096 sectorsize. If the partition is
properly aligned,
We just replaced a small disk that was going bad with
a bigger disk that the IT department cloned from
the smaller disk. It works fine, but the partition
table (naturally) doesn't know anything about the
additional space.
If I boot the system from a live CD, can I just tell
gparted to gro
On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 15:36:36 +1000
"Michael D. Setzer II" wrote:
> Possible a little off topic, but issues effect Fedora 16 sytems and
> grub2. Haven't been able to find detailed info on exactly what is
> going on with the grub2. If someone knows the info, or where I
> could find it. Thanks.
pened. Did the process on some machines, and it worked fine,
and others it did not. Not sure if it was something with the
grub2-install process, or using gparted.
I have systems that were updated to Fedora 16 as clean install
from DVD using a custom setup, since machines already had XP
and Fedo
Do what thou wilt
shall be the whole of the Law.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 3:38 PM, François Patte
>
> OK for this point. But the remaining problem is: why gparted does not
> see the partitions?
>
> fdisk and df can see roughly 2 partitions 20Go+480Go and gparted sees
> tha
Hi François,
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:38 PM, François Patte
wrote:
>
> fdisk and df can see roughly 2 partitions 20Go+480Go and gparted sees
> that mostly this disk has non-allocated space while the linux partition
> had 44Go of data on it...?
>
>
> Moreover, I tried to
er different units. With the
> above recipe, you will find 500 GB (gigabyte 10^9 bytes) is
> approximately equivalent to 465 GiB (gibibyte 2^10^3 bytes).
OK for this point. But the remaining problem is: why gparted does not
see the partitions?
fdisk and df can see roughly 2 partitions 20G
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 11:22 PM, charles zeitler wrote:
>> I have an external usb HD (500Go) which I partionned (with fdisk) like this:
>>
>> /dev/sdx1 ~20Go: ntfs
>> /dev/sdx2 rest of disk: ext3
>>
>> If I use df -h, I get:
>>
>> /dev/sdb2 439G 44G 374G 11% /media/linux
>> /dev/s
Do what thou wilt
shall be the whole of the Law.
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 11:31 AM, François Patte
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Bonjour,
>
> I have an external usb HD (500Go) which I partionned (with fdisk) like this:
>
> /dev/sdx1 ~20Go: ntfs
> /dev/sdx2 rest of
66M 20G 1% /media/ntfs
(today x=b!) the total 439+21= 460 so missing 40Go
If I use gparted (I want to change my partionning), I get:
/dev/sdb1: ntfs/media/ntfs1Kio
non-allocated:319,66Mio
/dev/sdb2: ext4 /media/linux2.84Mio
non-allocated
> cannot set this value to 0 with the move slider or by
>> entering it manually, it does not work.
>>
>> Is this an F13 gparted bug?
> Possibly. GParted in F13 has version 0.6.2. These are the release
> notes for v. 0.6.3:
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/gparted/files/gp
ring it manually, it does not work.
>
> Is this an F13 gparted bug?
Possibly. GParted in F13 has version 0.6.2. These are the release
notes for v. 0.6.3:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/gparted/files/gparted/gparted-0.6.3/gparted-0.6.3-notes.txt/view
(the link will likely be broken by the
On 10/18/2010 01:58 PM, Dan Thurman wrote:
> I used gparted on F13 to create an extended partition with
> various logical partitions installed and from the F13 gparted
> gui, there was no gaps.
>
> But when I rebooted and logged into my F9 system, I started
> gparted an
On 10/18/2010 01:58 PM, Dan Thurman wrote:
> I used gparted on F13 to create an extended partition with
> various logical partitions installed and from the F13 gparted
> gui, there was no gaps.
>
> But when I rebooted and logged into my F9 system, I started
> gparted an
I used gparted on F13 to create an extended partition with
various logical partitions installed and from the F13 gparted
gui, there was no gaps.
But when I rebooted and logged into my F9 system, I started
gparted and I am showing 1MB unallocated space for every
logical partition that I created
using gparted
to view the partitions of my drives and I noticed for my
F12 drive/partition, gparted was showing the following
under the 'Mount Point' column:
/, /var/named/chroot/etc/pki/dnssec-key,
/var/named/chroot/etc/rndc.key,
/var/named/chroot/usr/lib/bind
It used to show only
I thought I'd make a note of this here.
When booting from F12 LiveCD, yum install gparted
downloads fine, but then when one wants to reformat
a [ext4] partition, it barfs quite badly - something about
using one of gparted libraries. It corrupts the tables.
Interestingly, doing an fsck on
42 matches
Mail list logo
