Re: gnote vs Tomboy-some facts

2011-01-14 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Aaron Konstam wrote: > > Well once again Rahul we are having difficulty communicating and I don't > know why. For a week or so I have been asking people to share with me > information on syncing in tomboy. If you or Michael had shared with me > the information above

Re: gnote vs Tomboy-some facts

2011-01-13 Thread Aaron Konstam
On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 23:22 +0800, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Michael Semcheski > > My impression based on the websites for snowy and tomboy are: > 1. It sounds like Tomboy sync is not fully implemented yet. > Maybe in > a non

Re: gnote vs Tomboy

2011-01-13 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Michael Semcheski > > My impression based on the websites for snowy and tomboy are: > 1. It sounds like Tomboy sync is not fully implemented yet. Maybe in > a non-stable development version. > 2. The gnome-snowy project is the backend for Tomboy's sync, and its

Re: gnote vs Tomboy

2011-01-13 Thread Michael Semcheski
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Aaron Konstam wrote: > That is because he said it to me in an e-mail off-list. All of Fedora is > free is it not. As far as I know I can ask the Fedora developers to do > anything I want them to do and they can ignore the request. You can ask any developer on any

Re: gnote vs Tomboy

2011-01-13 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 6:06 AM, Aaron Konstam wrote: > > I have heard that argument before. The fwaact is currently tomcat is > actively being developed and gnote is not. Rahul assurews us that > sinchronation is in gnotes future and he inmplies that Snowy might work > with gnotewws . We will hav

Re: gnote vs Tomboy

2011-01-13 Thread Aaron Konstam
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 21:42 -0500, Michael Semcheski wrote: > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote: > > I have heard that argument before. The fact is currently tomcat is > > actively being developed and gnote is not. Rahul assures us that > > synchronization is in gnote's future a

Re: gnote vs Tomboy

2011-01-12 Thread Michael Semcheski
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote: > I have heard that argument before. The fwaact is currently tomcat is > actively being developed and gnote is not. Rahul assurews us that > sinchronation is in gnotes future and he inmplies that Snowy might work > with gnotewws . We will have

Re: gnote vs Tomboy

2011-01-12 Thread Aaron Konstam
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 13:06 -0700, Phil Meyer wrote: > On 01/11/2011 04:21 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote: > > Several versions of Fedora ago the default note taking software was > > switched from tomboy to note supposedly because note was a more > > efficient binary program. > > > > Now it turns out that

Re: gnote vs Tomboy

2011-01-12 Thread Phil Meyer
On 01/11/2011 04:21 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote: > Several versions of Fedora ago the default note taking software was > switched from tomboy to gnote supposedly because gnote was a more > efficient binary program. > > Now it turns out that the latest version of tomboy which can be yum > installed incl

Re: gnote vs Tomboy

2011-01-12 Thread Steven Stern
On 01/12/2011 08:11 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Aaron Konstam > wrote: > > The above statement confuses me since it does not respond to the last > statement I made in my first paragraph. > > > Explain what you are con

Re: gnote vs Tomboy

2011-01-12 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote: > > The above statement confuses me since it does not respond to the last > statement I made in my first paragraph. > Explain what you are confused about, more directly > This is a sync server for tomboy but Fedora seems to push gnote. If syn

Re: gnote vs Tomboy

2011-01-12 Thread Aaron Konstam
On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 19:51 +0800, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Aaron Konstam > wrote: > Well I can answer at least part of my own question. Although > it is not > clear why people are not interested in a note-taking program > that

Re: gnote vs Tomboy

2011-01-12 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote: > > Well I can answer at least part of my own question. Although it is not > clear why people are not interested in a note-taking program that can be > synchronized over several machines. > Same reason why Firefox 4 betas have sync options buil

Re: gnote vs Tomboy

2011-01-12 Thread Aaron Konstam
On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 17:21 -0600, Aaron Konstam wrote: > Several versions of Fedora ago the default note taking software was > switched from tomboy to gnote supposedly because gnote was a more > efficient binary program. > > Now it turns out that the latest version of tomboy which can be yum > in

gnote vs Tomboy

2011-01-11 Thread Aaron Konstam
Several versions of Fedora ago the default note taking software was switched from tomboy to gnote supposedly because gnote was a more efficient binary program. Now it turns out that the latest version of tomboy which can be yum installed includes the feature to allow you to synchronize the notes o