need something like xhost +SI:localhost: to
authorized different user (must be run locally on the machine with the
display).
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 4:27 PM Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> firewall-config works fine locally, but if I make a ssh -X on the machine,
> even in su
Hello,
firewall-config works fine locally, but if I make a ssh -X on the machine,
even in sudo, I get
X11 connection rejected because of wrong authentication.
xclock run fine.
===
Patrick DUPRÉ
On 4/13/20 2:28 PM, bruce wrote:
For the firewall, I'm trying to find example/samples of what the
firewall cmds/services/ports should be to lock the system down. I've
seen different sites that say different things, so I figured I'd ask
here as well.
For a normal web server, you only have port
Hi.
Forgive me! I'm setting up a test webserver/system, and I'm trying to make
sure I get the firewall stuff setup correctly. Actually, I'm trying to make
sure the firewall/selinux is all setup correctly.
For the firewall, I'm trying to find example/samples of what the firewall
cmds/services/port
uot; to install firewall-config. Therefore, I can reasonably
expect that if firewall-config needs something installed, it should get
pulled in as a direct or an indirect dependency.
But I have already established – and posted to the bug I earlier
referenced – the fact that, apparently, not
On 12/21/2014 02:07 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
I always thought that this was the whole reason behind rpm/yum: if
package X requires Y, then yum should install it automatically.
Yum will do that, if the package is available, but rpm doesn't.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
T
Rex Dieter writes:
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> I upgraded a headless F20 box to F21's server product.
If you want gui apps to work, it's generally best-practice to install at
least:
yum install @base-x
(and *maybe* @fonts too).
If there's stuff still missing or not working after that, *then* c
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> I upgraded a headless F20 box to F21's server product.
If you want gui apps to work, it's generally best-practice to install at
least:
yum install @base-x
(and *maybe* @fonts too).
If there's stuff still missing or not working after that, *then* consider it
a bug.
-
uct.
>>>>>
>>>>> xorg-x11-xauth is installed, in order to make X forwarding work over the
>>>> ssh
>>>>> connection.
>>>>>
>>>>> After installing the firewall-config rpm manually, it's obvious that many
rwarding work over the
>> ssh
>>> connection.
>>>
>>> After installing the firewall-config rpm manually, it's obvious that many
>> of
>>> its dependencies are missing.
>>>
>>> I was able to figure out that some of the default font packa
;> ssh
>>> connection.
>>>
>>> After installing the firewall-config rpm manually, it's obvious that many
>> of
>>> its dependencies are missing.
>>>
>>> I was able to figure out that some of the default font packages that must
poma writes:
On 20.12.2014 17:41, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> I upgraded a headless F20 box to F21's server product.
>
> xorg-x11-xauth is installed, in order to make X forwarding work over the
ssh
> connection.
>
> After installing the firewall-config rpm manually, it&#
On 20.12.2014 17:41, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> I upgraded a headless F20 box to F21's server product.
>
> xorg-x11-xauth is installed, in order to make X forwarding work over the ssh
> connection.
>
> After installing the firewall-config rpm manually, it's
I upgraded a headless F20 box to F21's server product.
xorg-x11-xauth is installed, in order to make X forwarding work over the ssh
connection.
After installing the firewall-config rpm manually, it's obvious that many of
its dependencies are missing.
I was able to figure out th
Rick Stevens wrote:
>On 03/11/2010 08:17 AM, Edward. S. P. Leong wrote:
>
>
>>Rick Stevens wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On 03/09/2010 07:47 PM, NoSpaze wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
Am Dienstag, den 09.03.2010, 23:09 +0800 schrieb Edward. S. P. Leong:
>NoSpaze wrote:
>
>
>> To clarify, several kernels ago the IPV4 iptables was defaulted to being
>> built into the kernel so it doesn't need a modprobe or insmod. Ditto
>> with the IPV4 conntrack (snippet of the default kernel config file):
>> CONFIG_NF_DEFRAG_IPV4=y <<< Built into kernel
>> CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_
On 03/11/2010 08:17 AM, Edward. S. P. Leong wrote:
> Rick Stevens wrote:
>> On 03/09/2010 07:47 PM, NoSpaze wrote:
>>
>>> Am Dienstag, den 09.03.2010, 23:09 +0800 schrieb Edward. S. P. Leong:
>>>
NoSpaze wrote:
> # modprobe ip_tables
> FATAL: Module ip_tables not found.
>
>>>
Rick Stevens wrote:
>On 03/09/2010 07:47 PM, NoSpaze wrote:
>
>
>>Am Dienstag, den 09.03.2010, 23:09 +0800 schrieb Edward. S. P. Leong:
>>
>>
>>>NoSpaze wrote:
>>>
>>>
# modprobe ip_tables
FATAL: Module ip_tables not found.
>>Again: this module does not exist!
On 03/09/2010 07:47 PM, NoSpaze wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 09.03.2010, 23:09 +0800 schrieb Edward. S. P. Leong:
>> NoSpaze wrote:
>>> # modprobe ip_tables
>>> FATAL: Module ip_tables not found.
>
> Again: this module does not exist! Maybe ip_nat or nf_nat?
To clarify, several kernels ago the IPV4 i
Dear you ,
In Fedora 9, the iptables function config is good for working as the
following :
modprobe ip_tables
modprobe ip_nat_ftp
modprobe ip_conntrack
modprobe ip_conntrack_ftp
iptables -F
iptables -X
iptables -F -t nat
iptables -X -t nat
iptables -F -t mangle
iptables -X -t mangle
iptables -P
Am Dienstag, den 09.03.2010, 23:09 +0800 schrieb Edward. S. P. Leong:
> NoSpaze wrote:
> > # modprobe ip_tables
> > FATAL: Module ip_tables not found.
Again: this module does not exist! Maybe ip_nat or nf_nat?
> > # modprobe ip_nat_ftp
> > # modprobe ip_conntrack
> > FATAL: Module ip_conntrack no
NoSpaze wrote:
>Am Montag, den 08.03.2010, 22:45 +0800 schrieb Edward. S. P. Leong:
>
>
>>Our is fedora 11...
>>
>>
>
>Mine is F12.
>
>
>
>>How can we enable the following of firewall function ( modules ), then
>>the ftp server is good for working ?
>>modprobe ip_tables
>>
>>
>
># lsmo
Am Montag, den 08.03.2010, 22:45 +0800 schrieb Edward. S. P. Leong:
> Our is fedora 11...
Mine is F12.
> How can we enable the following of firewall function ( modules ), then
> the ftp server is good for working ?
> modprobe ip_tables
# lsmod|grep tables
ip6_tables 9409 1 ip6table
Dear All,
Our is fedora 11...
How can we enable the following of firewall function ( modules ), then
the ftp server is good for working ?
modprobe ip_tables
modprobe ip_nat_ftp
modprobe ip_conntrack
modprobe ip_conntrack_ftp
Due to trying the following cmd under fc 11:
[~]# modprobe ip_tables
24 matches
Mail list logo
