On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 17:26 +, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> >I assume that all is well now?
>
> Gilboa,
> Thanks for the follow up, unfortunately it seems there is no ogl
> support for the external monitor with nvidia when using Linux:(
>
> Hard to believe really, possibly something to do with m
>I assume that all is well now?
Gilboa,
Thanks for the follow up, unfortunately it seems there is no ogl
support for the external monitor with nvidia when using Linux:(
Hard to believe really, possibly something to do with my laptop,
it is a _total_ pos...
I have an HP I have to setup sooner or
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 21:20 +, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> >Your nVidia driver installation is broken.
> >I see that you're using the driver directory from nvidia.com.
> >Have you considered using the RPMFusion drivers? [1]
>
> I am, I was using the kmods but when the update for newest kernel
>
>Your nVidia driver installation is broken.
>I see that you're using the driver directory from nvidia.com.
>Have you considered using the RPMFusion drivers? [1]
I am, I was using the kmods but when the update for newest kernel
lagged, I switched to the akmod.
Thanks!
jlc
--
users mailing list
us
On Sat, 2010-06-19 at 00:21 +, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> >What's the output of glxinfo?
>
> Gilboa,
> I am guessing this has something to do with the fact that I disable
> the Laptops built in LCD and enable only a external LCD?
>
> The output is rather long, but:
> # glxinfo
> name of displa
>It is kind of confusing to get right driver.
>The nv site points to 195.36.24 but the class of the card points to the
>legacy drivers 173
Turns out that with no xorg.conf and just the laptops built in LCD
enabled, ogl works fine. As soon as I disable the laptop LCD and
use the external lcd there
On 06/18/2010 05:26 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> Sorry I was in hurry this morn.
>>
>> The driver for that is 195.36.31
>> http://www.nvidia.com/object/linux-display-amd64-195.36.31-driver.html
>>
>> It is an old card but still fast enough to handle most video
>>
> Hi,
> I am using the 195.
>Sorry I was in hurry this morn.
>
>The driver for that is 195.36.31
>http://www.nvidia.com/object/linux-display-amd64-195.36.31-driver.html
>
>It is an old card but still fast enough to handle most video
Hi,
I am using the 195.36.24-1 akmod which is nearly as new...
Thanks!
jlc
--
users mailing
>What's the output of glxinfo?
Gilboa,
I am guessing this has something to do with the fact that I disable
the Laptops built in LCD and enable only a external LCD?
The output is rather long, but:
# glxinfo
name of display: :0.0
Error: glXCreateContext failed
64 GLX Visuals
visual x bf lv rg
On 06/18/2010 11:06 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> Have you been here yet?
>> http://www.nvidia.com/object/IO_28166.html
>>
>>
>> See if any of these helps
>>
> Is that url a typo?
> Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS 3.0 Update 6 with mptfusion driver fix...
>
> I am guessing it won't help:)
>
>Have you been here yet?
>http://www.nvidia.com/object/IO_28166.html
>
>
>See if any of these helps
Is that url a typo?
Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS 3.0 Update 6 with mptfusion driver fix...
I am guessing it won't help:)
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change
On 06/18/2010 10:09 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> Your hard is equivalent to a GeForce 6xxx series card. The 6 series is
>> no longer supported by nVidia's stable driver. You must use a legacy
>> driver, but their legacy driver does not support the version 1.8 X.org
>> server that Fedora 13 ships.
On 06/18/2010 10:09 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> Your hard is equivalent to a GeForce 6xxx series card. The 6 series is
>> no longer supported by nVidia's stable driver. You must use a legacy
>> driver, but their legacy driver does not support the version 1.8 X.org
>> server that Fedora 13 ships.
>Your hard is equivalent to a GeForce 6xxx series card. The 6 series is
>no longer supported by nVidia's stable driver. You must use a legacy
>driver, but their legacy driver does not support the version 1.8 X.org
>server that Fedora 13 ships.
Well, the release notes say its supported? Equivale
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> Anyone know why this card using the nvidia closed source driver from rpm
> fusion doesn't work with fgfs?
Your hard is equivalent to a GeForce 6xxx series card. The 6 series is
no longer supported by nVidia's stable driver. You must use a legacy
driver, but their legacy
On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 23:40 +, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> Anyone know why this card using the nvidia closed source driver from rpm
> fusion doesn't work with fgfs?
>
> When starting fgfs it suggests the card doesn't support opengl?
> Pretty sure that card does ogl... I am using the akmod as the
Anyone know why this card using the nvidia closed source driver from rpm
fusion doesn't work with fgfs?
When starting fgfs it suggests the card doesn't support opengl?
Pretty sure that card does ogl... I am using the akmod as there isn't a kmod
yet for the current kernel.
Thanks!
jlc
--
users ma
17 matches
Mail list logo
