Re: evolution 2.30.2-1

2010-07-13 Thread Gregory P. Ennis
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 19:15 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 18:17 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > > This is not an evolution problem at all. I have several packages that > > are not updating. I am going to close this thread out and start > > another one on yum. > > OT

Re: evolution 2.30.2-1

2010-07-13 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 18:17 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > This is not an evolution problem at all. I have several packages that > are not updating. I am going to close this thread out and start > another one on yum. OT, but you might want to check your quoting options. I'm finding this thread

Re: evolution 2.30.2-1

2010-07-13 Thread Gregory P. Ennis
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:43:41 -0500 "Gregory P. Ennis" wrote: > Dear List, > > When I scanned the fedora archives. it appeared that some have been > able to update to evolution 2.30.2-1. When I run 'yum -y update' > after a 'yum clean all' I am stil

Re: evolution 2.30.2-1

2010-07-13 Thread Gregory P. Ennis
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:43:41 -0500 "Gregory P. Ennis" wrote: > Dear List, > > When I scanned the fedora archives. it appeared that some have been > able to update to evolution 2.30.2-1. When I run 'yum -y update' > after a 'yum clean all' I am stil

Re: evolution 2.30.2-1

2010-07-13 Thread Gregory P. Ennis
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:43:41 -0500 "Gregory P. Ennis" wrote: > Dear List, > > When I scanned the fedora archives. it appeared that some have been > able to update to evolution 2.30.2-1. When I run 'yum -y update' > after a 'yum clean all' I am stil

Re: evolution 2.30.2-1

2010-07-13 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:43:41 -0500 "Gregory P. Ennis" wrote: > Dear List, > > When I scanned the fedora archives. it appeared that some have been > able to update to evolution 2.30.2-1. When I run 'yum -y update' > after a 'yum clean all' I am stil

Re: evolution 2.30.2-1

2010-07-13 Thread A. Racca
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 13:49 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 12:43 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > > Dear List, > > > > When I scanned the fedora archives. it appeared that some have been able > > to update to evolution 2.30.2-1. Wh

Re: evolution 2.30.2-1

2010-07-13 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 12:43 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > Dear List, > > When I scanned the fedora archives. it appeared that some have been able > to update to evolution 2.30.2-1. When I run 'yum -y update' after a > 'yum clean all' I am still not se

evolution 2.30.2-1

2010-07-13 Thread Gregory P. Ennis
Dear List, When I scanned the fedora archives. it appeared that some have been able to update to evolution 2.30.2-1. When I run 'yum -y update' after a 'yum clean all' I am still not seeing 30.2-1 in the repositories for 2.6.33.4-95.fc13.i686.PAE. Have any of you been able