On Sun, 4 Nov 2018 19:51:40 +0200
Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
> Hi! I just upgraded fron f28 and when using dnf i get :
> Failed to set locale, defaulting to C
>
> but i have :
> [root@t420 ~]# rpm -qa | grep glibc-langpack
> glibc-langpack-en-2.28-9.fc29.x86_64
>
> Does anyone have any idea what's
Hi! I just upgraded fron f28 and when using dnf i get :
Failed to set locale, defaulting to C
but i have :
[root@t420 ~]# rpm -qa | grep glibc-langpack
glibc-langpack-en-2.28-9.fc29.x86_64
Does anyone have any idea what's going on?
Thank you!!
Adrian
_
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 11:14:38PM +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> I run dnf update.
> At package 3935/4000, it failed, probably because a network issue
> (timeout)
> I am surprise than all the downloaded packages have be erased.
> When I restarted dnf update, it restart from scratch.
> Why?
> It cou
On 07/28/15 05:14, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> I run dnf update.
> At package 3935/4000, it failed, probably because a network issue
> (timeout)
> I am surprise than all the downloaded packages have be erased.
> When I restarted dnf update, it restart from scratch.
> Why?
> It could have just restart an
Hello,
I run dnf update.
At package 3935/4000, it failed, probably because a network issue
(timeout)
I am surprise than all the downloaded packages have be erased.
When I restarted dnf update, it restart from scratch.
Why?
It could have just restart and continue downloading the missing
65 packages
On Fri, 2015-05-29 at 09:46 +0100, philip wrote:
> > I get the same even after "dnf clean all", and it happens with
> update,
> > install, distro-sync, ...
> >
> > poc
>
> I get this error, and when I run with LIBREPO_DEBUG=1, I see a little
> more information.
>
> export LIBREPO_DEBUG=1
> dnf
> on Thu, 2015-05-28 at 08:25 -0400, Radek Holy wrote:
> >
> > -
Original Message -
> > > From: "jd1008"
> > > To: "Fedora
Community Users Support" > > >
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 12:11:34 AM
> >
On Thu, 28 May 2015 16:10:27 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
>
> On 05/28/2015 02:09 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 May 2015 19:46:05 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
> >
> >> On 05/27/2015 05:34 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> >>> Once upon a time, jd1008 said:
> Another failure:
> Error: package image
On 05/28/2015 02:09 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 27 May 2015 19:46:05 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
On 05/27/2015 05:34 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, jd1008 said:
Another failure:
Error: package image-analyzer-3.0.0-1.fc21.x86_64 requires
libmirage.so.10()(64bit), but none of the p
On Wed, 27 May 2015 19:46:05 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
> On 05/27/2015 05:34 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> > Once upon a time, jd1008 said:
> >> Another failure:
> >> Error: package image-analyzer-3.0.0-1.fc21.x86_64 requires
> >> libmirage.so.10()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
> >> installed.
>
008" mailto:jd1...@gmail.com>>
> > To: "Fedora Community Users Support"
mailto:users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > >
> > Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 12:11:34 AM
> > Subject: dnf failed to download repomd.xml from updates
>
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 11:23 -0400, Terry Polzin wrote:
> 64-bit issue? I've had no issues with 32-bit.
Seems to have been fixed now.
[Please don't top-post. See the list Guidelines]
poc
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://a
edora Community Users Support" > > >
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 12:11:34 AM
> > > Subject: dnf failed to download repomd.xml from updates
> > >
> > > # dnf distro-sync
> > > Fedora 22 - x86_64 3.1 MB/s | 41 MB 00:13
> > &
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 08:25 -0400, Radek Holy wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "jd1008"
> > To: "Fedora Community Users Support" > >
> > Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 12:11:34 AM
> > Subject: dnf failed to download repomd.x
- Original Message -
> From: "jd1008"
> To: "Fedora Community Users Support"
> Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 12:11:34 AM
> Subject: dnf failed to download repomd.xml from updates
>
> # dnf distro-sync
> Fedora 22 - x86_64 3.1 MB/s | 41 MB
On 05/27/2015 05:34 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, jd1008 said:
Another failure:
Error: package image-analyzer-3.0.0-1.fc21.x86_64 requires
libmirage.so.10()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
installed.
image-analyzer does not appear to be in Fedora, so you'll need to
consul
On 05/27/2015 04:43 PM, stan wrote:
On Wed, 27 May 2015 16:19:21 -0600
jd1008 wrote:
# rpm -qv --whatprovides /usr/lib64/libmirage.so.10
libmirage-3.0.3-1.fc21.x86_64
So, apparently, f22 updates repo is still not ready for prime time.
pkgs.org shows it available in F22. So, try doing a
dn
Once upon a time, jd1008 said:
> Another failure:
> Error: package image-analyzer-3.0.0-1.fc21.x86_64 requires
> libmirage.so.10()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
> installed.
image-analyzer does not appear to be in Fedora, so you'll need to
consult wherever you got it from to find out a
On Wed, 27 May 2015 16:19:21 -0600
jd1008 wrote:
> # rpm -qv --whatprovides /usr/lib64/libmirage.so.10
> libmirage-3.0.3-1.fc21.x86_64
>
> So, apparently, f22 updates repo is still not ready for prime time.
A further comment. If fedup didn't update it even though it is
available, there is prob
On Wed, 27 May 2015 16:19:21 -0600
jd1008 wrote:
> # rpm -qv --whatprovides /usr/lib64/libmirage.so.10
> libmirage-3.0.3-1.fc21.x86_64
>
> So, apparently, f22 updates repo is still not ready for prime time.
pkgs.org shows it available in F22. So, try doing a
dnf clean metadata
and running the
On 05/27/2015 03:19 PM, jd1008 wrote:
On 05/27/2015 04:15 PM, jd1008 wrote:
On 05/27/2015 04:11 PM, jd1008 wrote:
# dnf distro-sync
Fedora 22 - x86_64 3.1 MB/s | 41 MB 00:13
RPM Fusion for Fedora 22 - Free -
Updates 1.1 kB/s | 399
B 00:
> So, apparently, f22 updates repo is still not ready for prime time.
I'm so agree.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-co
On 05/27/2015 04:15 PM, jd1008 wrote:
On 05/27/2015 04:11 PM, jd1008 wrote:
# dnf distro-sync
Fedora 22 - x86_64 3.1 MB/s | 41 MB 00:13
RPM Fusion for Fedora 22 - Free -
Updates 1.1 kB/s | 399
B 00:00
RPM Fusion for Fedora 22 - Nonfre
On 05/27/2015 04:11 PM, jd1008 wrote:
# dnf distro-sync
Fedora 22 - x86_64 3.1 MB/s | 41 MB 00:13
RPM Fusion for Fedora 22 - Free -
Updates 1.1 kB/s | 399
B 00:00
RPM Fusion for Fedora 22 - Nonfree -
Updates
# dnf distro-sync
Fedora 22 - x86_64 3.1 MB/s | 41 MB 00:13
RPM Fusion for Fedora 22 - Free -
Updates 1.1 kB/s | 399
B 00:00
RPM Fusion for Fedora 22 - Nonfree -
Updates2.8 kB/s | 399 B
00:
Thax Chris.
Bug submitted along with debugdata.
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Chris Murphy
wrote:
> You have 90% of information for a bug report against dnf. However, before
> actually permitting yum to proceed with the installation, first you should
> change the dnf command:
>
> dnf -y --de
You have 90% of information for a bug report against dnf. However, before
actually permitting yum to proceed with the installation, first you should
change the dnf command:
dnf -y --debugsolver install amd
Then tar the resulting debugdata folder in the current directory, and include
that as a
-- snip --
May I ask why did you send such email instead of filing a bug report? If you
read the dnf FAQ, cleaned the cache and everything, you can go right ahead.
The dnf developers are very responsive in the bugzilla.
Jan
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or
# dnf -y install amd
Dependencies resolved.
Package Arch
Version Repository Size
==
29 matches
Mail list logo
