Re: dnf-system-upgrade to Fedora 41 is Ok

On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 1:38 PM wrote: > > On Wed, 2024-10-30 at 12:48 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > RPMFusion users may want to wait for the third party repository to > > rebuild its packages for F41. > > RPMfusion repos are already on F41. Conflicting NVIDIA Packages from RPM Fusion,

Re: dnf-system-upgrade to Fedora 41 is Ok

> On 4 Nov 2024, at 12:58, Barry wrote: > > This is because the database with the repo cannot be migrated from f40/dnf4 > to f41/dnf5. Should say database with the “repo info cannot…”. Barry -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.o

Re: dnf-system-upgrade to Fedora 41 is Ok

> On 2 Nov 2024, at 22:04, Stephen Morris wrote: > > Functionality" where that display is new with F41 and for me, for every > update, that 2nd line lists the repository as "". This is because the database with the repo cannot be migrated from f40/dnf4 to f41/dnf5. As you update the repo dat

Re: dnf-system-upgrade to Fedora 41 is Ok

On 2/11/24 15:23, jim.cro...@gmail.com wrote: new here is the 2nd line below - perhaps the replacing line is obvious, and suppressible ?  xwaylandvideobridge                                 x86_64     0.4.0-7.fc41                                        updates                     209.3 KiB  

Re: dnf-system-upgrade to Fedora 41 is Ok

OK++ Ive upgraded 1/2 machines, using graphical interface from the "notify" prompt. all went smoothly. Speed of update seems faster, maybe its the ~3 progress bars updating so smoothly. new here is the 2nd line below - perhaps the replacing line is obvious, and suppressible ? xwaylandvideobri

Re: dnf-system-upgrade to Fedora 41 is Ok

On 10/30/24 4:39 PM, t_...@tiscali.it wrote: On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 13:17:56 -0700 Dave Close wrote: Is it still true that stock F41 does not include the ability to run X11? I'm stuck until Wayland has a way to invoke Firefox from a cron job. I've made the upgrade from Fedora 39 to 41 (Xfce). E

Re: dnf-system-upgrade to Fedora 41 is Ok

On Oct 30, 2024, at 16:18, Dave Close wrote: > > Is it still true that stock F41 does not include the ability to run X11? > I'm stuck until Wayland has a way to invoke Firefox from a cron job. If it’s a cron job that runs as your user as part of your login session (and shouldn’t ever run if yo

Re: dnf-system-upgrade to Fedora 41 is Ok

On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 13:17:56 -0700 Dave Close wrote: > Is it still true that stock F41 does not include the ability to run > X11? I'm stuck until Wayland has a way to invoke Firefox from a cron > job. I've made the upgrade from Fedora 39 to 41 (Xfce). Everything is OK. My X11 / C / Motif stuff k

Re: dnf-system-upgrade to Fedora 41 is Ok

Once upon a time, Dave Close said: > Is it still true that stock F41 does not include the ability to run X11? That hasn't ever been true... -- Chris Adams -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to user

Re: dnf-system-upgrade to Fedora 41 is Ok

On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 4:18 PM Dave Close wrote: > > Is it still true that stock F41 does not include the ability to run X11? > I'm stuck until Wayland has a way to invoke Firefox from a cron job. I don't run X so I can't say for certain. But there's a lot of X11 gear in the standard repos: $ d

Re: dnf-system-upgrade to Fedora 41 is Ok

Is it still true that stock F41 does not include the ability to run X11? I'm stuck until Wayland has a way to invoke Firefox from a cron job. -- Dave Close, Compata, Irvine CA "Tact is insulting a man without d...@compata.com, +1 714 434 7359his knowing it." dhcl...@alumni.caltech.edu

Re: dnf-system-upgrade to Fedora 41 is Ok

On Wed, 2024-10-30 at 12:48 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > RPMFusion users may want to wait for the third party repository to > rebuild its packages for F41. RPMfusion repos are already on F41. poc -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject

dnf-system-upgrade to Fedora 41 is Ok

Hi Everyone, I just upgraded three machines to Fedora 41 using . The machines were two desktops and one server. All the machines use the default Fedora repos; and they do not use third party repos. The process went as expe