On 6/30/21 11:26 AM, Tim via users wrote:
The CTRL C abort sequence is more to do with aborting the running of
scripts, and the like. I'm not sure that more, less, vi, and other
such things, should be expected to abort with a CTRL C command.
I don't know about vi, as I never use it, but nano u
On Wed, 2021-06-30 at 12:06 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> Looks like something "more" is doing.
Plenty of other things will ignore CTRL C, such as reading man pages.
The CTRL C abort sequence is more to do with aborting the running of
scripts, and the like. I'm not sure that more, less, vi, and ot
>
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2021, at 9:06 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 Jun 2021 17:56:24 +0200
> > Patrick Dupre wrote:
> >
> > > For example
> > > ls -lt |more
> >
> > Looks like something "more" is doing. Try this:
> >
> > sleep 500
> > ^C
>
> I am on F33 (so not an F34 issue) with Xfce4 and I s
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: ctl C/ctl X
>
> On Wed, 30 Jun 2021 17:56:24 +0200
> Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
> > For example
> > ls -lt |more
>
> Looks like something "more" is doing. Try this:
>
> sleep 500
> ^C
> __
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021, at 9:06 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jun 2021 17:56:24 +0200
> Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
> > For example
> > ls -lt |more
>
> Looks like something "more" is doing. Try this:
>
> sleep 500
> ^C
I am on F33 (so not an F34 issue) with Xfce4 and I see the same as Patrick d
On Wed, 30 Jun 2021 17:56:24 +0200
Patrick Dupre wrote:
> For example
> ls -lt |more
Looks like something "more" is doing. Try this:
sleep 500
^C
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.
> Subject: Re: ctl C/ctl X
>
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 05:23:54PM +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > Before fc34 (i.e. in fc32), I used to used ctlC to interrupt any sort of
> > process. In fc34, to have the same result, I need to do
> > ctlC ctlX
> > How can I
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 05:23:54PM +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Before fc34 (i.e. in fc32), I used to used ctlC to interrupt any sort of
> process. In fc34, to have the same result, I need to do
> ctlC ctlX
> How can I avoid to have to make this double command?
Not sure how this happened, Control
Hello,
Before fc34 (i.e. in fc32), I used to used ctlC to interrupt any sort of
process. In fc34, to have the same result, I need to do
ctlC ctlX
How can I avoid to have to make this double command?
Thanks
===
Patrick DUPRÉ
