Suvayu Ali writes:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 12:33:53PM +0200, lee wrote:
>>
>> I've done that yesterday. It's working already, showing an
>> automatically scaling graph of the used network bandwidth over 360
>> samples, with the update interval given on the command line. Let it
>> update ever
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 12:33:53PM +0200, lee wrote:
>
> I've done that yesterday. It's working already, showing an
> automatically scaling graph of the used network bandwidth over 360
> samples, with the update interval given on the command line. Let it
> update every 10 seconds, and you see th
Mateusz Marzantowicz writes:
> On 21.07.2013 09:55, lee wrote:
>> Did you find an explanation for why it displays different numbers than
>> top does or why it ignores the update interval for checking mail? I
>> thought it probably uses the same data sources for this information and
>> didn't rea
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 09:48:11AM +0200, lee wrote:
> Suvayu Ali writes:
>
> > Sadly I do not have answers to any of your questions. However I have to
> > say, I have been using conky for 5 years now; it has been incredibly
> > reliable for me. If you think it would help, I could share my conk
On 21.07.2013 09:55, lee wrote:
> Mateusz Marzantowicz writes:
>
>> On 19.07.2013 12:32, lee wrote:
>>> Suvayu Ali writes:
>>>
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 05:13:12PM +0200, lee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> does anyone know what conky displays as CPU usage for a process? The
> values are dif
Mateusz Marzantowicz writes:
> On 19.07.2013 12:32, lee wrote:
>> Suvayu Ali writes:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 05:13:12PM +0200, lee wrote:
Hi,
does anyone know what conky displays as CPU usage for a process? The
values are different in conky and top, for example, top m
Suvayu Ali writes:
> Sadly I do not have answers to any of your questions. However I have to
> say, I have been using conky for 5 years now; it has been incredibly
> reliable for me. If you think it would help, I could share my conkyrc.
Thank you, I guess it won"t hurt to share it. I'm going
On 19.07.2013 12:32, lee wrote:
> Suvayu Ali writes:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 05:13:12PM +0200, lee wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> does anyone know what conky displays as CPU usage for a process? The
>>> values are different in conky and top, for example, top might show 11.6
>>> for a process while c
Sadly I do not have answers to any of your questions. However I have to
say, I have been using conky for 5 years now; it has been incredibly
reliable for me. If you think it would help, I could share my conkyrc.
Cheers,
--
Suvayu
Open source is the future. It sets us free.
--
users mailing l
Suvayu Ali writes:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 05:13:12PM +0200, lee wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> does anyone know what conky displays as CPU usage for a process? The
>> values are different in conky and top, for example, top might show 11.6
>> for a process while conky says 3.01.
>
> Not on my system. T
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 05:13:12PM +0200, lee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> does anyone know what conky displays as CPU usage for a process? The
> values are different in conky and top, for example, top might show 11.6
> for a process while conky says 3.01.
Not on my system. The polling times are a bit diff
Hi,
does anyone know what conky displays as CPU usage for a process? The
values are different in conky and top, for example, top might show 11.6
for a process while conky says 3.01.
--
Fedora release 19 (Schrödinger’s Cat)
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or
12 matches
Mail list logo
