On 11/9/24 3:59 PM, home user via users wrote:
On 11/8/24 10:53 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 11/8/24 8:46 PM, home user via users wrote:
I thought that in the case of a file that IS owned by a package, rpm -qf was
displaying the name of the owned file. So I was expecting a file name to
appear o
On 11/9/24 5:08 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Fri, 2024-11-08 at 21:53 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 11/8/24 8:46 PM, home user via users wrote:
I thought that in the case of a file that IS owned by a package, rpm -qf
was displaying the name of the owned file. So I was expecting a file
name
On 11/8/24 10:53 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 11/8/24 8:46 PM, home user via users wrote:
I thought that in the case of a file that IS owned by a package, rpm -qf was
displaying the name of the owned file. So I was expecting a file name to
appear once, not 2000+ times!
It's now occurring to me
On Fri, 2024-11-08 at 21:53 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 11/8/24 8:46 PM, home user via users wrote:
> > I thought that in the case of a file that IS owned by a package, rpm -qf
> > was displaying the name of the owned file. So I was expecting a file
> > name to appear once, not 2000+ times!
>
On 11/8/24 8:46 PM, home user via users wrote:
I thought that in the case of a file that IS owned by a package, rpm -qf
was displaying the name of the owned file. So I was expecting a file
name to appear once, not 2000+ times!
It's now occurring to me that in the case of a file that is owned
On 11/8/24 9:06 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 11/8/24 6:19 PM, home user via users wrote:
On 11/8/24 6:40 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 11/8/24 5:14 PM, home user via users wrote:
Tried this on /lib/modules/6.11.5-200.fc40.x86_64/.
Some files got listed (file names only) a huge number of times (multip
On 11/8/24 6:19 PM, home user via users wrote:
On 11/8/24 6:40 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 11/8/24 5:14 PM, home user via users wrote:
Tried this on /lib/modules/6.11.5-200.fc40.x86_64/.
Some files got listed (file names only) a huge number of times
(multiple 40-line screens per file). These ar
On 11/8/24 6:40 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 11/8/24 5:14 PM, home user via users wrote:
On 11/8/24 5:18 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 11/8/24 10:15 AM, home user via users wrote:
While doing those "rpm -qf" commands, 2 questions came to mind.
1. Suppose [dir] has sub-directories. If I do "rpm -qf [
On 11/8/24 6:33 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 8:15 PM home user via users
wrote:
On 11/8/24 5:18 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 11/8/24 10:15 AM, home user via users wrote:
While doing those "rpm -qf" commands, 2 questions came to mind.
1. Suppose [dir] has sub-directories. If
On 11/8/24 5:14 PM, home user via users wrote:
On 11/8/24 5:18 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 11/8/24 10:15 AM, home user via users wrote:
While doing those "rpm -qf" commands, 2 questions came to mind.
1. Suppose [dir] has sub-directories. If I do "rpm -qf [dir]/*",
will it also check [dir]'s sub
On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 8:15 PM home user via users
wrote:
>
> On 11/8/24 5:18 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > On 11/8/24 10:15 AM, home user via users wrote:
> >> While doing those "rpm -qf" commands, 2 questions came to mind.
> >> 1. Suppose [dir] has sub-directories. If I do "rpm -qf [dir]/*", will
On 11/8/24 5:18 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 11/8/24 10:15 AM, home user via users wrote:
While doing those "rpm -qf" commands, 2 questions came to mind.
1. Suppose [dir] has sub-directories. If I do "rpm -qf [dir]/*", will it also
check [dir]'s sub-directories?
If no, then
2. How do get the sub-
On 11/8/24 10:15 AM, home user via users wrote:
While doing those "rpm -qf" commands, 2 questions came to mind.
1. Suppose [dir] has sub-directories. If I do "rpm -qf [dir]/*", will
it also check [dir]'s sub-directories?
If no, then
2. How do get the sub-directories checked without having to d
On 11/7/24 10:22 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 11/7/24 4:15 PM, home user via users wrote:
On 11/6/24 10:15 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
[snip]
[snip]
-bash.11[~]:
I still have old kernel files in /boot:
-bash.17[~]: cd /boot
-bash.18[boot]: ls *-6.10.*
config-6.10.12-100.fc39.x86_64 System
On 11/7/24 4:15 PM, home user via users wrote:
On 11/6/24 10:15 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
[snip]
`package-cleanup --oldkernels --count=2` might help with that. It
removes all old kernels except the current kernel and the one before
it.
-bash.6[~]: package-cleanup --oldkernels --count=2
packag
On 11/6/24 10:15 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
[snip]
`package-cleanup --oldkernels --count=2` might help with that. It
removes all old kernels except the current kernel and the one before
it.
-bash.6[~]: package-cleanup --oldkernels --count=2
package-cleanup has to be executed with one of the op
On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 5:04 PM home user via users
wrote:
>
> On 11/6/24 11:12 AM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > [...]
> >>> Related, be sure to look in /lib/modules for old kernel artifacts.
> >>> There have been several bugs related to proceccessing old kernel
> >>> removals. The removal scripts wou
On 11/6/24 11:12 AM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Sat, Oct 26, 2024 at 5:43 PM home user via users
wrote:
On 10/25/24 12:45 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 8:42 PM home user via users
wrote:
(f-40; gnome; stand-alone dual-boot workstation; kernel 6.11.3)
Selected command out
On Sat, Oct 26, 2024 at 5:43 PM home user via users
wrote:
>
> On 10/25/24 12:45 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 8:42 PM home user via users
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> (f-40; gnome; stand-alone dual-boot workstation; kernel 6.11.3)
> >>
> >> Selected command output...
> >>
> >> -b
On 10/25/24 12:45 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 8:42 PM home user via users
wrote:
(f-40; gnome; stand-alone dual-boot workstation; kernel 6.11.3)
Selected command output...
-bash.2[~]: rpm -qa kernel
kernel-6.10.12-200.fc40.x86_64
kernel-6.11.3-200.fc40.x86_64
-bash.3[~]
On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 8:42 PM home user via users
wrote:
>
> (f-40; gnome; stand-alone dual-boot workstation; kernel 6.11.3)
>
> Selected command output...
>
> -bash.2[~]: rpm -qa kernel
> kernel-6.10.12-200.fc40.x86_64
> kernel-6.11.3-200.fc40.x86_64
> -bash.3[~]:
>
> -bash.3[~]: rpm -qa kernel
(updated and revised)
On 10/23/24 5:51 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Oct 23, 2024, at 17:56, home user via users
wrote:
-bash.1[~]: rpm -qa kernel [complete]
kernel-6.11.3-200.fc40.x86_64
kernel-6.11.4-201.fc40.x86_64
-bash.2[~]:
-bash.2[~]: rpm -qa kernel-core [complete]
kernel-core
On 10/23/24 2:56 PM, home user via users wrote:
On 10/23/24 3:18 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Oct 22, 2024, at 20:42, home user via users
wrote:
(f-40; gnome; stand-alone dual-boot workstation; kernel 6.11.3)
Selected command output...
-bash.2[~]: rpm -qa kernel
kernel-6.10.12-200.fc40.
On Oct 23, 2024, at 17:56, home user via users
wrote:
>
> On 10/23/24 3:18 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
>>> On Oct 22, 2024, at 20:42, home user via users
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> (f-40; gnome; stand-alone dual-boot workstation; kernel 6.11.3)
>>>
>>> Selected command output...
>>>
>>> -bash.2[
On 10/23/24 3:18 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Oct 22, 2024, at 20:42, home user via users
wrote:
(f-40; gnome; stand-alone dual-boot workstation; kernel 6.11.3)
Selected command output...
-bash.2[~]: rpm -qa kernel
kernel-6.10.12-200.fc40.x86_64
kernel-6.11.3-200.fc40.x86_64
-bash.3[~]:
On Oct 22, 2024, at 20:42, home user via users
wrote:
>
> (f-40; gnome; stand-alone dual-boot workstation; kernel 6.11.3)
>
> Selected command output...
>
> -bash.2[~]: rpm -qa kernel
> kernel-6.10.12-200.fc40.x86_64
> kernel-6.11.3-200.fc40.x86_64
> -bash.3[~]:
>
> -bash.3[~]: rpm -qa kerne
(f-40; gnome; stand-alone dual-boot workstation; kernel 6.11.3)
Selected command output...
-bash.2[~]: rpm -qa kernel
kernel-6.10.12-200.fc40.x86_64
kernel-6.11.3-200.fc40.x86_64
-bash.3[~]:
-bash.3[~]: rpm -qa kernel-core
kernel-core-6.10.12-200.fc40.x86_64
kernel-core-6.11.3-200.fc40.x86_64
-
27 matches
Mail list logo
