On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 12:38:19PM -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> I do not get why chronyc should run and create such a racket at 100%
> CPU.
chronyc is used by a NetworkManager dispatcher script to switch NTP
sources online or offline when the network configuration is changed.
Maybe there is a bug
On 5 October 2017 at 14:52, Fred Smith
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 12:38:19PM -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > Thanks!
>
> While it's true that I'm running Centos-7 instead of Fedora, CentOS also
> uses chrony as its default ntp client.
>
With systemd there are 3 options:
systemd-timesyncd
Ranjan Maitra writes:
> > I guess I am wondering if there is a major cost to sudo dnf erase
chronyc -y.
>
> The major cost is that if your puter's clock is off, its internal time will
> slowly drift apart.
Will ntpd not address this issue?
ntpd is a viable alternative.
> How important is
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 12:38:19PM -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> Thanks!
While it's true that I'm running Centos-7 instead of Fedora, CentOS also
uses chrony as its default ntp client.
On my system "ps ax | grep -i chrony" turns up two processes, chronyd,
and the grep.
# ps ax | grep -i chrony
Thanks!
On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 13:05:27 -0400 Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Ranjan Maitra writes:
>
> > Over the past few weeks, my laptop has been running chronyc at full blast.
> >
> > $top
> >
> > 12657 root 20 0 20624 1308 1160 R 93.8 0.0 1739:52 chronyc
> >
> > I looked up chronyc
Ranjan Maitra writes:
Over the past few weeks, my laptop has been running chronyc at full blast.
$top
12657 root 20 0 20624 1308 1160 R 93.8 0.0 1739:52 chronyc
I looked up chronyc and found that this controls NTP. I use NTP, but do I
need to keep this around? Or is the goo
Over the past few weeks, my laptop has been running chronyc at full blast.
$top
12657 root 20 0 20624 1308 1160 R 93.8 0.0 1739:52 chronyc
I looked up chronyc and found that this controls NTP. I use NTP, but do I need
to keep this around? Or is the good old ntp good enoug
