Allegedly, on or about 05 January 2015, Bob Goodwin sent:
> Crony/ntp appears to be giving the expected results this morning after
> being left to do whatever it does overnight and rebooting the client
> again. So I conclude that although I can do systemctl restart chrony
> that doesn't initiat
On 05.01.2015 11:20, poma wrote:
> On 05.01.2015 10:41, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>>
>> On 01/05/15 01:43, Tim wrote:
>>> Allegedly, on or about 04 January 2015, Bob Goodwin sent:
> But I could have two crony/NTP servers no? In addition to box10 I
> could make box7 an ntp server and list both in t
On 05.01.2015 10:41, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
> On 01/05/15 01:43, Tim wrote:
>> Allegedly, on or about 04 January 2015, Bob Goodwin sent:
But I could have two crony/NTP servers no? In addition to box10 I
could make box7 an ntp server and list both in the clients
configuration file?
>>
On 01/05/15 01:43, Tim wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 04 January 2015, Bob Goodwin sent:
>But I could have two crony/NTP servers no? In addition to box10 I
>could make box7 an ntp server and list both in the clients
>configuration file?
Yes, that's actually a good idea. If you already have two
Allegedly, on or about 04 January 2015, Bob Goodwin sent:
> But I could have two crony/NTP servers no? In addition to box10 I
> could make box7 an ntp server and list both in the clients
> configuration file?
Yes, that's actually a good idea. If you already have two PCs
consulting the outside wo
On 04.01.2015 17:29, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
> On 01/04/15 06:26, poma wrote:
>> ACTING AS AN NTP SERVER /usr/share/doc/chrony/chrony.conf.example
>> http://git.tuxfamily.org/chrony/chrony.git/?p=chrony/chrony.git;a=blob;f=examples/chrony.conf.example#l167
>>
>> Good morning Alfred
>
> On 01/03/
On 01/05/15 07:44, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> server 192.168.1.10
Should be...
server 192.168.1.10 iburst
Works here...
[root@f21 etc]# chronyc sources
210 Number of sources = 1
MS Name/IP address Stratum Poll Reach LastRx Last sample
=
On 01/04/15 18:01, Ed Greshko wrote:
But I could have two crony/NTP servers no? In addition to box10 I could make
box7 an ntp server and list both in the clients configuration file? That
doesn't seem problematic or am I missing something?
>
>
Yes, you can have multiple "server" lines in the c
On 01/05/15 03:35, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
> On 01/04/15 14:24, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> >So it appears that I need to change box10 to make it an ntp server:
>>> >
>>> ># Allow NTP client access from local network.
>>> >#allow 192.168/16
>>> >allow 192.168.1.0/24
>>> >
>>> >In the firewalld GUI I have ch
On 01/04/15 14:24, Ed Greshko wrote:
>So it appears that I need to change box10 to make it an ntp server:
>
># Allow NTP client access from local network.
>#allow 192.168/16
>allow 192.168.1.0/24
>
>In the firewalld GUI I have checked NTP under SERVICES and made it PERMANENT.
I'm really unsure
On 01/05/15 00:29, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
> On 01/04/15 06:26, poma wrote:
>> ACTING AS AN NTP SERVER /usr/share/doc/chrony/chrony.conf.example
>> http://git.tuxfamily.org/chrony/chrony.git/?p=chrony/chrony.git;a=blob;f=examples/chrony.conf.example#l167
>> Good morning Alfred
>
> On 01/03/15 19:04
On 01/04/15 06:26, poma wrote:
ACTING AS AN NTP SERVER /usr/share/doc/chrony/chrony.conf.example
http://git.tuxfamily.org/chrony/chrony.git/?p=chrony/chrony.git;a=blob;f=examples/chrony.conf.example#l167
Good morning Alfred
On 01/03/15 19:04, Ed Greshko wrote:
Assuming that one of them is r
On 04.01.2015 10:17, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
> On 01/04/15 04:14, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>>
>> On 01/03/15 20:55, g wrote:
>>> laughing at yourself or using syncing servers to a workstation.;-)
> Sorry, I somehow got that message addressed wrong!
>
> Bob
>
ACTING AS AN NTP SERVER
/usr/share/doc/chrony
On 01/04/15 04:14, Bob Goodwin wrote:
On 01/03/15 20:55, g wrote:
laughing at yourself or using syncing servers to a workstation.;-)
Sorry, I somehow got that message addressed wrong!
Bob
--
http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
box10 Fedora-21/64bit Linux/XFCE
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fed
On 01/03/15 20:55, g wrote:
laughing at yourself or using syncing servers to a workstation.;-)
hi Bob,
along with what Ed Greshko suggested,,,
being that you have mentioned the internet time cost with being on
satellite, you prefer to limit running ntp for clock syncing.
so what is wrong wi
On 01/03/2015 06:42 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> On 01/03/15 19:04, Ed Greshko wrote:
<<>>
>> So, you need a local ntp server.
>>
>> You have 2 workstations getting their time sync from the internet
>> as their access is enabled. One of those could act as a time
>> server.
<<>>
>> -- If you c
On 01/03/15 19:04, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 01/04/15 07:30, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
>On 01/03/15 17:53, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>My read of your request is this
>>
>>You have a system for which WAN access is blocked. So it can't contact an
ntp server on outside of your LAN for time synchronization.
On 01/04/15 07:30, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
> On 01/03/15 17:53, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> My read of your request is this
>>
>> You have a system for which WAN access is blocked. So it can't contact an
>> ntp server on outside of your LAN for time synchronization.
>>
>> In that case,*if* you have a
On 01/03/15 17:53, Ed Greshko wrote:
My read of your request is this
You have a system for which WAN access is blocked. So it can't contact an ntp
server on outside of your LAN for time synchronization.
In that case,*if* you have a local system server as a time source you need to set th
On 01/04/15 06:21, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
> On 01/03/15 16:39, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 01/04/15 01:27, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>>> If I block WAN connection to a server will it find a time reference on the
>>> LAN? There's usually a workstation connected and getting it's clock updated
>>> but it looks l
On 01/03/15 16:39, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 01/04/15 01:27, Bob Goodwin wrote:
If I block WAN connection to a server will it find a time reference on the LAN?
There's usually a workstation connected and getting it's clock updated but it
looks like the server is not? I haven't found the answer in
On 01/04/15 01:27, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> If I block WAN connection to a server will it find a time reference on the
> LAN? There's usually a workstation connected and getting it's clock updated
> but it looks like the server is not? I haven't found the answer in the man
> pages ... I was looking
If I block WAN connection to a server will it find a time reference on
the LAN? There's usually a workstation connected and getting it's clock
updated but it looks like the server is not? I haven't found the answer
in the man pages ... I was looking for a configuration setting perhaps.
Bob
--
23 matches
Mail list logo