Btw, please stick to proper formatting so that you do not attribute comments
made by you to somebody else (in this case me).
On Mon, 07 Dec 2015 22:13:40 + arnaud gaboury
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015, 10:13 PM Ranjan Maitra
> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 7 Dec 2015 17:11:19 +0100 arnaud gaboury
>
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015, 10:13 PM Ranjan Maitra
wrote:
On Mon, 7 Dec 2015 17:11:19 +0100 arnaud gaboury
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Ranjan Maitra
> wrote:
> > Question: why do you need R-intel-core? My RStudio works fine without
it.
>
> Long debate, but R built with Intel is faster.
On Mon, 7 Dec 2015 17:11:19 +0100 arnaud gaboury
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Ranjan Maitra
> wrote:
> > Question: why do you need R-intel-core? My RStudio works fine without it.
>
> Long debate, but R built with Intel is faster.
I see, thanks! But, RStudio is hardly what I would
On 12/07/2015 11:17 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 6:49 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 12/07/2015 09:20 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 5:16 PM, arnaud gaboury
wrote:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Michael Schwendt
wrote:
On Mon, 7 Dec 2015 16:14:03 +0100
On Mon, 7 Dec 2015 09:49:03 -0800, Rick Stevens wrote:
> You should also make sure your "home-made" libR RPM pokes the
> pkg-config system so the various build tools know about it. Obviously
> you've installed it, but likely
>
> pkg-config {--exists | --atleast-version=VERSION | --exact-
>
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 6:49 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 12/07/2015 09:20 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 5:16 PM, arnaud gaboury
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Michael Schwendt
>>> wrote:
On Mon, 7 Dec 2015 16:14:03 +0100, arnaud gaboury wrote
On 12/07/2015 09:20 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 5:16 PM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Mon, 7 Dec 2015 16:14:03 +0100, arnaud gaboury wrote:
I wrote and build successfuly a rpm package. When it comes to install,
I have
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 5:16 PM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> On Mon, 7 Dec 2015 16:14:03 +0100, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>>
>>> I wrote and build successfuly a rpm package. When it comes to install,
>>> I have this error:
>>>
>>> # dnf install My
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Dec 2015 16:14:03 +0100, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>
>> I wrote and build successfuly a rpm package. When it comes to install,
>> I have this error:
>>
>> # dnf install MyPackage.rpm
>> Error: package rstudio-server-0.99.800-1.fc23.x8
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Ranjan Maitra
wrote:
> Question: why do you need R-intel-core? My RStudio works fine without it.
Long debate, but R built with Intel is faster.
>
> Did you try BuildRequiring R-core-devel?
libR.so is installed by R-core, but will try
>
> Thanks,
> Ranjan
>
> PS: B
On Mon, 7 Dec 2015 16:14:03 +0100, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> I wrote and build successfuly a rpm package. When it comes to install,
> I have this error:
>
> # dnf install MyPackage.rpm
> Error: package rstudio-server-0.99.800-1.fc23.x86_64 requires
> libR.so()(64bit), but none of the providers can
Question: why do you need R-intel-core? My RStudio works fine without it.
Did you try BuildRequiring R-core-devel?
Thanks,
Ranjan
PS: Btw,
$ sudo dnf whatprovides /usr/lib64/R/lib/libR.so
Last metadata expiration check performed 1:42:29 ago on Mon Dec 7 08:00:56
2015.
R-core-3.2.2-2.fc23.x8
I wrote and build successfuly a rpm package. When it comes to install,
I have this error:
# dnf install MyPackage.rpm
Error: package rstudio-server-0.99.800-1.fc23.x86_64 requires
libR.so()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
The cited library is indeed already installed:
% ldconf
13 matches
Mail list logo
