sixpack13 wrote:
>> to me it seems completely unnecessary.
>> My comment is right under the comment I replied to.
Ed Greshko:
> You may think it is unnecessary. However, some people have their
> email clients configured to display "unread" messages. When a reply
> is sent sometime after the ori
On 30/01/2021 07:05, sixpack13 wrote:
On Fri, 2021-01-29 at 21:59 +, sixpack13 wrote:
And once again, you didn't quote what you are replying to.
poc
to me it seems completely unnecessary.
My comment is right under the comment I replied to.
You may think it is unnecessary. However, so
On Fri, 2021-01-29 at 23:05 +, sixpack13 wrote:
> > On Fri, 2021-01-29 at 21:59 +, sixpack13 wrote:
> >
> > And once again, you didn't quote what you are replying to.
> >
> > poc
>
> to me it seems completely unnecessary.
> My comment is right under the comment I replied to.
>
> tha
s/provides/provided/
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https:
> On Fri, 2021-01-29 at 21:59 +, sixpack13 wrote:
>
> And once again, you didn't quote what you are replying to.
>
> poc
to me it seems completely unnecessary.
My comment is right under the comment I replied to.
that is the case now here in hyperkitty and - IIRC- was the same when I read
On Fri, 2021-01-29 at 21:59 +, sixpack13 wrote:
> Aha !
> THX, something learned
And once again, you didn't quote what you are replying to.
poc
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lis
@Alex
obviously I provides wrong info's trying to answer your questions.
sorry !
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraprojec
Aha !
THX, something learned
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines
On 1/29/21 1:19 PM, sixpack13 wrote:
in the OP's text:
- 1. sentence, last part:
"...would like to get more involved with auditd."
- in the 2. sentence, 2. part:
"..., but are there any tools to process the audit.log..."
- in the 4. paragraph, last part of the se
in the OP's text:
- 1. sentence, last part:
"...would like to get more involved with auditd."
- in the 2. sentence, 2. part:
"..., but are there any tools to process the audit.log..."
- in the 4. paragraph, last part of the sentence:
"..., but what do p
On Fri, 2021-01-29 at 12:08 -0500, Garry T. Williams wrote:
> On Friday, January 29, 2021 9:47:35 AM EST Greg Woods wrote:
> > I have personal experience with Gmail, where I used to be able
> > to highlight part of the message, and that was all that would be included
> > in my reply, but that no lo
On Friday, January 29, 2021 9:47:35 AM EST Greg Woods wrote:
> I have personal experience with Gmail, where I used to be able
> to highlight part of the message, and that was all that would be included
> in my reply, but that no longer works; the entire message is included and I
> have to manually
On Fri, 2021-01-29 at 07:47 -0700, Greg Woods wrote:
> I have personal experience with Gmail, where I used to be able
> to highlight part of the message, and that was all that would be
> included
> in my reply, but that no longer works; the entire message is included
> and I
> have to manually trim
On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 at 06:31, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-01-29 at 17:59 +1030, Tim via users wrote:
> > On Thu, 2021-01-28 at 16:49 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
[...]
> > Or, put another way, there's a very good reason why the long-
> > established way to participate in a mailing lis
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 3:32 AM Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> > there's a very good reason why the long-
> > established way to participate in a mailing list is quote the salient
> > bits of the prior email and directly reply to individual sentences or
> > paragraphs right underneath them. So tha
On Fri, 2021-01-29 at 17:59 +1030, Tim via users wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-01-28 at 16:49 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > You completely removed any context and your message is unclear...
>
> Q: How many surrealists does it take to change a light bulb?
>
> A: Two, one to hold the giraffe, and the other
On Thu, 2021-01-28 at 16:49 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> You completely removed any context and your message is unclear...
Q: How many surrealists does it take to change a light bulb?
A: Two, one to hold the giraffe, and the other to fill the bathtub with
brightly colored machine tools.
Or, put
unclear...
selinux and auditd are separate, so I have no idea what you're trying to
say here.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
could
sudo dnf install setroubleshoot-server setroubleshoot
and/or
https://docs.fedoraproject.org//en-US/Fedora/25/html/SELinux_Users_and_Administrators_Guide/index.html
- actuality ??? -
help ?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
T
Hi,
I have a fedora33 system and would like to get more involved with
auditd. I understand the basics, but are there any tools to process
the audit.log file, to make it easier to process, read and display?
How about acting on specific events? What if I wanted to be alerted
somehow when sudo was
Hi,
Since upgrading from fedora22, auditd is drowning /var/log/messages
with useless information such as this:
Jul 18 19:02:19 orion audit: pid=6002 uid=0
auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 msg='op=destroy kind=server
fp=SHA256:b5:7b:76:df:38:16:f3:f5:cd:2f:67:54:9a:2e:68:15:ae:9c:40:50:4f:
Hi,
Since upgrading from fedora22, auditd is drowning /var/log/messages
with useless information such as this:
Jul 18 19:02:19 orion audit: pid=6002 uid=0
auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 msg='op=destroy kind=server
fp=SHA256:b5:7b:76:df:38:16:f3:f5:cd:2f:67:54:9a:2e:68:15:ae:9c:40:50:4f:
On 7/18/2015 7:08 PM, Alex wrote:
Hi,
Since upgrading from fedora22, auditd is drowning /var/log/messages
with useless information such as this:
Jul 18 19:02:19 orion audit: pid=6002 uid=0
auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 msg='op=destroy kind=server
fp=SHA256:b5:7b:76:df:38:16:f3:f5:cd:
On 07/18/2015 06:08 PM, Alex wrote:
Hi,
Since upgrading from fedora22, auditd is drowning /var/log/messages
with useless information such as this:
Jul 18 19:02:19 orion audit: pid=6002 uid=0
auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 msg='op=destroy kind=server
fp=SHA256:b5:7b:76:df:38:16:f3:f5:cd:
On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 19:08:20 -0400
Alex wrote:
> I've enabled rsyslog because the logs are so much easier to access,
> but I'm not using auditd so would like to just turn it off.
stick audit=0 on the kernel command line options in grub.cfg,
disable the auditd service (or unins
Hi,
Since upgrading from fedora22, auditd is drowning /var/log/messages
with useless information such as this:
Jul 18 19:02:19 orion audit: pid=6002 uid=0
auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 msg='op=destroy kind=server
fp=SHA256:b5:7b:76:df:38:16:f3:f5:cd:2f:67:54:9a:2e:68:15:ae:9c:40:50:4f:6d:
On 06/23/2015 12:36 AM, Kevin Wilson wrote:
> Dan,
> Thanks a lot for your reply.
> In fact, I ran
> pm -e selinux-policy-targeted
> rpm -e selinux-policy
> And after reboot I got some message about freeze from systemd, I could
> not login (tried twice), so I reinstalled Linux on this machine.
>
Hi,
One of the reasons I'm using Fedora is because the exceptional support for
SELinux and auditd that so far - despite a known incompatibility with
Docker + Btrfs - is working great.
Said that, kudos to everyone who makes SELinux integration such smooth.
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 1:36 AM
Dan,
Thanks a lot for your reply.
In fact, I ran
pm -e selinux-policy-targeted
rpm -e selinux-policy
And after reboot I got some message about freeze from systemd, I could
not login (tried twice), so I reinstalled Linux on this machine.
The question is: what do you mean by "If you disable SELinux".
Hi Daniel,
On 22 June 2015 at 15:41, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> On 06/22/2015 03:44 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 08:01:41AM +0300, Kevin Wilson wrote:
>>> In /etc/selinux/config
>>>
>>> I set
>>> SELINUX=disabled
>>> Which means that I do not use in fact SElinux, so it seems to m
On 06/22/2015 03:44 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 08:01:41AM +0300, Kevin Wilson wrote:
>> In /etc/selinux/config
>>
>> I set
>> SELINUX=disabled
>> Which means that I do not use in fact SElinux, so it seems to me.
> It is recommended to keep it permissive instead of disabled.
>
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 08:01:41AM +0300, Kevin Wilson wrote:
>
> In /etc/selinux/config
>
> I set
> SELINUX=disabled
> Which means that I do not use in fact SElinux, so it seems to me.
It is recommended to keep it permissive instead of disabled.
> So will it be OK to run:
> rpm -e selinux-poli
, Ranjan Maitra
wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 19:19:15 -0400 Tom Horsley wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 19:14:56 -0400
>> Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>>
>> > My totally unscientific assessment of auditd is that it's a massive syslog
>> > spammer, and won'
On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 19:19:15 -0400 Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 19:14:56 -0400
> Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>
> > My totally unscientific assessment of auditd is that it's a massive syslog
> > spammer, and won't be missed.
>
> There are a few o
On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 19:14:56 -0400
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> My totally unscientific assessment of auditd is that it's a massive syslog
> spammer, and won't be missed.
There are a few obscure questions you can answer about your
system using auditd, but it is almost impossible to
Kevin Wilson writes:
Hi all,
Will I miss something critical if I will disable auditd on Fedora 22
by "systemctl disable auditd" ?
My totally unscientific assessment of auditd is that it's a massive syslog
spammer, and won't be missed.
pgp96k7vv5BE7.pgp
Descri
Hi all,
Will I miss something critical if I will disable auditd on Fedora 22
by "systemctl disable auditd" ?
Regards,
Kevin
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedo
(as close to as SELinux gets) user-friendly
> > > explanations.
> > Of course the biggest downside to turning off auditd, and
> > potentially other logging services, is that when error/problems
> > exist you'll not be notified nor will you have a record of what
> &
On 05/30/2015 06:51 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 05/30/15 10:40, Matthew Miller wrote:
is pretty effective. Primary downside: if you have SELinux violations,
you don't get (as close to as SELinux gets) user-friendly explanations.
Of course the biggest downside to turning off auditd
On 05/30/15 10:40, Matthew Miller wrote:
> is pretty effective. Primary downside: if you have SELinux violations,
> you don't get (as close to as SELinux gets) user-friendly explanations.
Of course the biggest downside to turning off auditd, and potentially other
logging services, i
On 05/31/15 07:51, jd1008 wrote:
>
>
> On 05/29/2015 08:40 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 05/30/15 10:19, jd1008 wrote:
>>> How can we stop auditd ???
>>>
>> 2 choices
>>
>> 1. add audit=0 to the kernel command line in grub menu
>>
&
On 05/29/2015 08:40 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 05/30/15 10:19, jd1008 wrote:
How can we stop auditd ???
2 choices
1. add audit=0 to the kernel command line in grub menu
or
2. systemctl mask auditd.service
reboot.
You can't stop it manually in a running system due to the settings i
On 05/29/2015 08:40 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
systemctl mask auditd.service
Thanx Ed. I prefer your solution to removing packages.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code
On 05/30/15 10:40, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 08:19:47PM -0600, jd1008 wrote:
>> How can we stop auditd ???
>
> sudo dnf remove audit
>
> is pretty effective. Primary downside: if you have SELinux violations,
> you don't get (as close to a
On Fri, 29 May 2015 20:19:47 -0600
jd1008 wrote:
> How can we stop auditd ???
Put audit=0 on the kernel options in grub.cfg (and
/etc/default/grub)
and also
systemctl disable auditd.service
and for good measure to be absolutely sure
systemctl mask auditd.service
I think that is two be
On 05/30/15 10:19, jd1008 wrote:
> How can we stop auditd ???
>
2 choices
1. add audit=0 to the kernel command line in grub menu
or
2. systemctl mask auditd.service
reboot.
You can't stop it manually in a running system due to the settings in the
auditd.service file.
--
I
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 08:19:47PM -0600, jd1008 wrote:
> How can we stop auditd ???
sudo dnf remove audit
is pretty effective. Primary downside: if you have SELinux violations,
you don't get (as close to as SELinux gets) user-friendly explanations.
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Projec
How can we stop auditd ???
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On 03/29/2013 06:58 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
That is a common typo for "failed" (the a and f are interchanged). I
bet everyone has made a typo like that sometime in the past. Other such
comon typos could be missing letters, interchanging characters and
spaces at word boundaries, etc.
*Snicker!*
On 03/29/13 23:52, Tim wrote:
> Allegedly, on or about 29 March 2013, Ed Greshko sent:
>> From now on, at least during winter time, Im going to blame all
>> spelling an grammar erros on the cat sitting on my chest every time I
>> sit down at the computer
> And this generates a strange mental pi
Allegedly, on or about 29 March 2013, Ed Greshko sent:
> From now on, at least during winter time, Im going to blame all
> spelling an grammar erros on the cat sitting on my chest every time I
> sit down at the computer
And this generates a strange mental picture... ;-)
Is it an anti-gravit
On 03/29/13 22:42, Reindl Harald wrote:
> it's a difference having a typo in the subject or in the content
> especially if someone speaks about auditd in the subject and
> sshd in the content
A typo is a typo. You just didn't have enough context for you to be able to
figure i
Am 29.03.2013 15:31, schrieb Ed Greshko:
> On 03/29/13 21:58, Suvayu Ali wrote:
>> Hi Reindl,
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 02:28:27PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> your subject "auditd is afiled how to enable" does not describe
>>> your probl
On 03/29/13 21:58, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> Hi Reindl,
>
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 02:28:27PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> your subject "auditd is afiled how to enable" does not describe
>> your problem, "afiled" is AFAIK not a known word, so please
>>
Hi Reindl,
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 02:28:27PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> your subject "auditd is afiled how to enable" does not describe
> your problem, "afiled" is AFAIK not a known word, so please
> consider in the future to describe your problem, find a m
0530; 33min ago
>
> Main PID: 10063 (code=exited, status=255)
well, after get rid of top-posting "yum install openssh-server"
and what has this to do with auditd at all?
your subject "auditd is afiled how to enable" does not describe
your problem, "afiled" i
On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 18:26:13 +0530
Prashanth Kasula wrote:
> [root@KM-WS151 /]# service sshd status
> Redirecting to /bin/systemctl status sshd.service
> sshd.service
> Loaded: error (Reason: No such file or directory)
> Active: failed since Fri, 29 Mar 2013 17:44:48 +0530;
> 3
, Mar 29, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 29.03.2013 12:45, schrieb Prashanth Kasula:
> > For sshd service there is a problem in enabling auditd service.if any
> one knows the process please let us know.
>
> STOP TO START EACH DAY MULTIPLE THREADS WITHOUT AN
On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 12:57:51 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 29.03.2013 12:45, schrieb Prashanth Kasula:
> > For sshd service there is a problem in enabling auditd service.if any one
> > knows the process please let us know.
>
> STOP TO START EACH DAY M
On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 12:57:51 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 29.03.2013 12:45, schrieb Prashanth Kasula:
> > For sshd service there is a problem in enabling auditd service.if
> > any one knows the process please let us know.
> * what is your input
> * what
Am 29.03.2013 12:45, schrieb Prashanth Kasula:
> For sshd service there is a problem in enabling auditd service.if any one
> knows the process please let us know.
STOP TO START EACH DAY MULTIPLE THREADS WITHOUT ANY INFORMATIONS
FOR THE SAME PROBLEM - LEARN TO PROVIDE INFORMATIONS!
&qu
Hi all,
For sshd service there is a problem in enabling auditd service.if any one
knows the process please let us know.
Thanks
Prashanth
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
62 matches
Mail list logo
