Re: Yum cache memory space -

2012-09-11 Thread Bill Davidsen
Reindl Harald wrote: Am 05.09.2012 18:52, schrieb Bob Goodwin - Zuni: Error Downloading Packages: 1:libreoffice-core-3.5.6.2-2.fc17.x86_64: Insufficient space in download directory /var/cache/yum/x86_64/17/updates/packages * free 45 M * ne

Re: LVM [WAS Re: Yum cache memory space -]

2012-09-11 Thread Bill Davidsen
Reindl Harald wrote: Am 06.09.2012 21:35, schrieb Steven Stern: On 09/06/2012 01:47 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: On 09/06/2012 11:23 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote: For which I am deeply grateful. Most of the time LVM is fine, even preferred, but some times I really "want it my way" and now that's easy. P

Re: LVM [WAS Re: Yum cache memory space -]

2012-09-10 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 06.09.2012 21:35, schrieb Steven Stern: > On 09/06/2012 01:47 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: >> On 09/06/2012 11:23 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote: >>> For which I am deeply grateful. Most of the time LVM is fine, even >>> preferred, but some times I really "want it my way" and now that's easy. >> >> Personally

Re: Yum cache memory space -

2012-09-10 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 05.09.2012 18:52, schrieb Bob Goodwin - Zuni: >Error Downloading Packages: > 1:libreoffice-core-3.5.6.2-2.fc17.x86_64: Insufficient space >in download directory /var/cache/yum/x86_64/17/updates/packages > * free 45 M > * needed 70 M > >[

LVM [WAS Re: Yum cache memory space -]

2012-09-06 Thread Steven Stern
On 09/06/2012 01:47 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 09/06/2012 11:23 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote: >> For which I am deeply grateful. Most of the time LVM is fine, even >> preferred, but some times I really "want it my way" and now that's easy. > > Personally, I find LVM to be a great solution looking for a p

Re: Yum cache memory space -

2012-09-06 Thread Joe Zeff
On 09/06/2012 11:23 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote: For which I am deeply grateful. Most of the time LVM is fine, even preferred, but some times I really "want it my way" and now that's easy. Personally, I find LVM to be a great solution looking for a problem. I only have one LVM partition, and that

Re: Yum cache memory space -

2012-09-06 Thread Bill Davidsen
Michael Cronenworth wrote: Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: Yes, I suppose you're right but I wanted to partition it myself instead of the usual lvm. I will live with my mistakes, hopefully get it right next time. There is a "use lvm" checkbox that you can uncheck during i

Re: Yum cache memory space -

2012-09-05 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: > >Yes, I suppose you're right but I wanted to partition it myself >instead of the usual lvm. I will live with my mistakes, hopefully >get it right next time. There is a "use lvm" checkbox that you can uncheck during installation. You are no lo

Re: Yum cache memory space -

2012-09-05 Thread Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
On 05/09/12 13:56, Michael Cronenworth responds: Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: Perhaps I should have allocated space differently? Yes. It makes little sense to set hard partitions on root folders on a desktop system. Allow the Fedora installer to setup default partitions. There i

Re: Yum cache memory space -

2012-09-05 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote: > >Perhaps I should have allocated space differently? Yes. It makes little sense to set hard partitions on root folders on a desktop system. Allow the Fedora installer to setup default partitions. There is little reason besides personal preference to c

Yum cache memory space -

2012-09-05 Thread Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
I just finished a yum update and when done had this error message: Error Downloading Packages: 1:libreoffice-core-3.5.6.2-2.fc17.x86_64: Insufficient space in download directory /var/cache/yum/x86_64/17/updates/packages * free 45 M * needed 70