Allegedly, on or about 19 September 2014, jd1008 sent:
> I was indeed eyed suspiciously by other cafe' clientele. They might
> have thought I was trying to hack into their computers. They must not
> be aware that the router isolates the lan clients from each other.
One might presume that a router
On 09/20/2014 03:28 AM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> On 20.09.2014, Doug wrote:
>
>> First: Higher power does NOT increase noise in the signal. It just increases
>> the amount of
>> radio frequency energy in the general area, which may be "noise" to some
>> _other_ piece of equipment.
>
> Yes, you are
On 20.09.2014, Doug wrote:
> A better location will probably be somewhere up above all the clutter around
> your work-station.
> Try it up about head-height or higher, on a little bracket or shelf on the
> wall.
This is what I did some time ago and what worked for me.
Btw: I'm using an exter
On 20.09.2014, Doug wrote:
> First: Higher power does NOT increase noise in the signal. It just increases
> the amount of
> radio frequency energy in the general area, which may be "noise" to some
> _other_ piece of equipment.
Yes, you are right. I was imprecise. What I meant is that barely
i
On 09/19/2014 07:24 PM, Doug wrote:
/snip/
***
I'm replying to myself! One other thing has occurred to me: With _any_ external
wi-fi
plug-in, you can remote the plug-in to a better location (which you find by
trial)
On 09/19/2014 05:24 PM, Doug wrote:
On 09/19/2014 07:00 PM, jd1008 wrote:
On 09/19/2014 04:50 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 09/19/2014 02:53 PM, jd1008 issued this missive:
On 09/19/2014 01:14 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
On 19.09.2014, jd1008 wrote:
Bit Rate=72.2 Mb/s Tx-Power=15 dBm
S
On 09/19/2014 07:00 PM, jd1008 wrote:
>
> On 09/19/2014 04:50 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
>> On 09/19/2014 02:53 PM, jd1008 issued this missive:
>>>
>>> On 09/19/2014 01:14 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
On 19.09.2014, jd1008 wrote:
>Bit Rate=72.2 Mb/s Tx-Power=15 dBm
> So, reaso
On 09/19/2014 04:50 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 09/19/2014 02:53 PM, jd1008 issued this missive:
On 09/19/2014 01:14 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
On 19.09.2014, jd1008 wrote:
Bit Rate=72.2 Mb/s Tx-Power=15 dBm
So, reason I am asking is that I would like to increase Tx power to
30dBm
due
On 09/19/2014 02:53 PM, jd1008 issued this missive:
On 09/19/2014 01:14 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
On 19.09.2014, jd1008 wrote:
Bit Rate=72.2 Mb/s Tx-Power=15 dBm
So, reason I am asking is that I would like to increase Tx power to
30dBm
due to poor connectivity with the hotspot route
On 09/19/2014 02:53 PM, jd1008 issued this missive:
On 09/19/2014 01:14 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
On 19.09.2014, jd1008 wrote:
Bit Rate=72.2 Mb/s Tx-Power=15 dBm
So, reason I am asking is that I would like to increase Tx power to
30dBm
due to poor connectivity with the hotspot route
On 09/19/2014 01:14 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
On 19.09.2014, jd1008 wrote:
Bit Rate=72.2 Mb/s Tx-Power=15 dBm
So, reason I am asking is that I would like to increase Tx power to 30dBm
due to poor connectivity with the hotspot router.
There are two barriers:
1. the capability of you
On 19.09.2014, jd1008 wrote:
> Bit Rate=72.2 Mb/s Tx-Power=15 dBm
> So, reason I am asking is that I would like to increase Tx power to 30dBm
> due to poor connectivity with the hotspot router.
There are two barriers:
1. the capability of your adapter
2. CRDA
For most countries,
On 09/18/2014 09:40 PM, Tim wrote:
On Thu, 2014-09-18 at 19:46 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
I do not have a physical access to the access point.
It is a public hotspot (at a restaurant). My laptop
has no antennas :)
. that might allow you to dangle a better antenna lead through
the chassis. Messy
On Thu, 2014-09-18 at 19:46 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
> I do not have a physical access to the access point.
> It is a public hotspot (at a restaurant). My laptop
> has no antennas :)
Probably, their system is crap, with nothing you can do about it. It
seems to be par for the course with those things.
On Thu, 2014-09-18 at 18:23 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
> So, reason I am asking is that I would like to increase Tx power to
> 30dBm due to poor connectivity with the hotspot router.
Something tells me that wouldn't help. WiFi seems to work well with
quite weak signals, so boosting them when your neari
On 09/18/2014 07:28 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 09/18/2014 05:23 PM, jd1008 issued this missive:
# lspci | grep -i wifi
0c:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation WiFi Link 5100
dmesg | grep -i iwlwifi
[ 10.019366] iwlwifi :0c:00.0: Detected Intel(R) WiFi Link 5100
AGN, REV=0x54
dmesg
On 09/18/2014 05:23 PM, jd1008 issued this missive:
# lspci | grep -i wifi
0c:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation WiFi Link 5100
dmesg | grep -i iwlwifi
[ 10.019366] iwlwifi :0c:00.0: Detected Intel(R) WiFi Link 5100
AGN, REV=0x54
dmesg also shows
[ 266.827254] wlan0: Limiting TX
# lspci | grep -i wifi
0c:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation WiFi Link 5100
dmesg | grep -i iwlwifi
[ 10.019366] iwlwifi :0c:00.0: Detected Intel(R) WiFi Link 5100
AGN, REV=0x54
dmesg also shows
[ 266.827254] wlan0: Limiting TX power to 36 (36 - 0) dBm as advertised
by 00:0d:67
18 matches
Mail list logo
