On 06/29/2010 11:34 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 June 2010 08:20 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
>
>> The newest official Firefox version is 3.5.10.
>> Your version is not detected. Update now.
>>
>>
> Its 3.6.4.
>
>
It depends on the OS, on F12 it's 3.5.10. On F13 it's 3.6.4.
Paolo
-
On Tuesday 29 June 2010 08:20 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
> The newest official Firefox version is 3.5.10.
> Your version is not detected. Update now.
>
Its 3.6.4.
--
Suvayu
Open source is the future. It sets us free.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscr
Oh, man, I think I just figured out where you're coming from.
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:17 PM, Robert Myers wrote:
> [...]
> I'm saying that because Flash is nothing but a source of problems, even on
> Windows.
Yesterday or the day before, after the periodic yum update on my
iBook, Firefox laun
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Craig White wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 10:17 -0400, Robert Myers wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 11:47 PM, Joel Rees
> > wrote:
>
> >
> > What bias. I hate Windows. If you want to see how the web looks to
> > someone other than a geek, you have to use Wi
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 10:17 -0400, Robert Myers wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 11:47 PM, Joel Rees
> wrote:
>
> What bias. I hate Windows. If you want to see how the web looks to
> someone other than a geek, you have to use Windows.
I don't understand this - I use both Windows and Linux
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 11:47 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
>
> On Jun 29, 2010, at 11:18 AM, Robert Myers wrote:
>
> > But there is a Fedora issue here. Why would anyone sane try to use
> > bleeding-edge Fedora for multi-media web surfing?
>
> Just curious, are you talking about rawhide or 64 bit? Pleas
On Jun 29, 2010, at 11:18 AM, Robert Myers wrote:
> But there is a Fedora issue here. Why would anyone sane try to use
> bleeding-edge Fedora for multi-media web surfing?
Just curious, are you talking about rawhide or 64 bit? Please be a
little more specific. Otherwise, you could hit someon
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Michal wrote:
> as issues, but those issues don't seem to affect
> > Chrome as much. I don't have Chrome suddenly go away while I'm perusing
> > some website as often happens with Firefox. But even when I'm not
> > visiting sites that use flash FF still consumes
On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 13:12 -0700, Tim Van Dyne wrote:
> I'd also point out that with 50-60 tabs open at any given time I've
> simply not experienced the issues you're having with it personally.
I don't know how people manage that. Quite apart from being able to
pick the one that you want, I find
>
>
>>> It's not "my" Firefox that has problems, it's Firefox that has
issues.
>>> It doesn't render pages correctly, it crashes often, particularly on
>>> pages that have flash, and it consumes huge amounts of memory and
cpu.
>>>
>> The "particularly on pages that have flash" bit should
On 06/28/2010 10:00 AM, Michal wrote:
> as issues, but those issues don't seem to affect
>
>> Chrome as much. I don't have Chrome suddenly go away while I'm perusing
>> some website as often happens with Firefox. But even when I'm not
>> visiting sites that use flash FF still consumes a lot o
as issues, but those issues don't seem to affect
> Chrome as much. I don't have Chrome suddenly go away while I'm perusing
> some website as often happens with Firefox. But even when I'm not
> visiting sites that use flash FF still consumes a lot of memory. At
> least once a day I have to stop an
On 06/28/2010 09:34 AM, Chris Tyler wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 09:20 -0700, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
>
>
>> It's not "my" Firefox that has problems, it's Firefox that has issues.
>> It doesn't render pages correctly, it crashes often, particularly on
>> pages that have flash, and it consumes h
On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 09:20 -0700, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
> It's not "my" Firefox that has problems, it's Firefox that has issues.
> It doesn't render pages correctly, it crashes often, particularly on
> pages that have flash, and it consumes huge amounts of memory and cpu.
The "particularly on pa
On 06/28/2010 07:30 AM, Tim Van Dyne wrote:
>> It seems firefox gets worse every release.
>>
Ya ever stop to wonder if it's simply the package on your own system?
Because I just rolled out the latest Firefox to 226 Fedora systems
over the weekend and they all work like a charm.
I do know that F
>> It seems firefox gets worse every release.
>>
Ya ever stop to wonder if it's simply the package on your own system?
Because I just rolled out the latest Firefox to 226 Fedora systems over
the weekend and they all work like a charm.
I do know that Firefox *sometimes* jacks up royally if you u
On 06/26/2010 09:24 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 08:02 -0700, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
>
>> I logged into my laptop this AM and discovered that during the night
>> firefox had crashed. I restarted it and now it wont display any
>> sites. Every tab that is supposed to au
On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 08:02 -0700, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
> I logged into my laptop this AM and discovered that during the night
> firefox had crashed. I restarted it and now it wont display any
> sites. Every tab that is supposed to auto start is blank, even though
> it remembers the site address
I logged into my laptop this AM and discovered that during the night firefox
had crashed. I restarted it and now it wont display any sites. Every tab
that is supposed to auto start is blank, even though it remembers the site
address it wont load content no matter how many times I reload the page.
19 matches
Mail list logo
