On 3/4/21 1:56 PM, Roger Heflin wrote:
The only command that I know of that can delete a partition mapping
like this is partx. On mine partx is not in the initrd so it should
not be happening there.
So:
cd /usr/sbin
mv partx partx.exe
then create a file:
#!/bin/bash
logger "$(/usr/bin/date) ka
The only command that I know of that can delete a partition mapping
like this is partx. On mine partx is not in the initrd so it should
not be happening there.
So:
cd /usr/sbin
mv partx partx.exe
then create a file:
#!/bin/bash
logger "$(/usr/bin/date) kartx run with options $*"
/usr/sbin/partx.
On 3/3/21 11:50 PM, Roger Heflin wrote:
the dm-multipath should be ok, so long as multipathd is not there.
grep -i del_part_nodes /lib/udev/rules.d/*
shows the multipath delete rule. I am on 32 and don't see anything
else using it.
if you cat the rule with the del_part_nodes code you could s
the dm-multipath should be ok, so long as multipathd is not there.
grep -i del_part_nodes /lib/udev/rules.d/*
shows the multipath delete rule. I am on 32 and don't see anything
else using it.
if you cat the rule with the del_part_nodes code you could see if
anything else on 33 uses it.
On W
On 3/3/21 6:22 PM, Roger Heflin wrote:
That looks like multipath is blacklisted.
you might to a lsinitrd | grep -i multipath and make sure it is not in
the initrd with a config file.
multipath is the only service I have seen that actually deletes
partition mappings, but it is possible that some
and the multipath delete code is in udev so if you search udev then
the code doing it should be in there. And I would think anyone else's
partition mapping deletes would be in there.
On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 11:22 AM Roger Heflin wrote:
>
> That looks like multipath is blacklisted.
>
> you might t
That looks like multipath is blacklisted.
you might to a lsinitrd | grep -i multipath and make sure it is not in
the initrd with a config file.
multipath is the only service I have seen that actually deletes
partition mappings, but it is possible that some of the other dm*
stuff might (dm-raid ma
On 3/3/21 12:39 PM, Roger Heflin wrote:
Blacklist the wwwid in multipath.conf and/or blacklist the disk type
in multipath.
And/or whitelist the disks you want multipath to manage.
If all of your disks have 2 paths and are expected to have 2 paths
then you can set file_multipaths to only manage
Blacklist the wwwid in multipath.conf and/or blacklist the disk type
in multipath.
And/or whitelist the disks you want multipath to manage.
If all of your disks have 2 paths and are expected to have 2 paths
then you can set file_multipaths to only manage devices with 2 paths,
but to make multipat
On 3/2/21 10:24 PM, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
On 3/2/21 5:04 PM, GianPiero Puccioni wrote:
so it is there and seen but why the block device is not created? Copying
the content of (sda1)boot into /boot and reinstalling grub could probably
work but how?
Hi GianPiero,
This is strange. I don't know w
if you are running multipath then here is what happened, multipath
started up and attempted to manage sda and so it deleted sda1, then
once it gets to sda2 it figures out the vg is live and online and it
figures out it cannot manage it, so stops. No code exists apparently
to go back and put back s
On 03/03/2021 05:04, GianPiero Puccioni wrote:
Hi,
I have a problem with an old rack unit I use in a cluster. We had a problem
with the HD and had to change it and reinstall. It was done by someone new to
the job (I am locked and doing everything remotely) and he had a problem with
the configur
On 3/2/21 5:04 PM, GianPiero Puccioni wrote:
> so it is there and seen but why the block device is not created?
> Copying the content of (sda1)boot into /boot and reinstalling grub could
> probably work but how?
Hi GianPiero,
This is strange. I don't know why there's no device file for the first
Hi,
I have a problem with an old rack unit I use in a cluster. We had a problem
with the HD and had to change it and reinstall. It was done by someone new to
the job (I am locked and doing everything remotely) and he had a problem with
the configuration as it seems that this unit HD HAS to be co
14 matches
Mail list logo
