Re: Fwd: Updates next steps

2010-04-24 Thread David
On 4/24/2010 11:23 AM, Steven Stern wrote: > Agreed. If I want updates, let me have whatever's available when I look. > However, give me the option to schedule the update check. > > That is, I get to decide when and how to handle updates. You (the > maintainers and packagers) just keep pushing th

Re: Fwd: Updates next steps

2010-04-24 Thread Steven Stern
Agreed. If I want updates, let me have whatever's available when I look. However, give me the option to schedule the update check. That is, I get to decide when and how to handle updates. You (the maintainers and packagers) just keep pushing them into the pipeline. On 04/23/2010 08:51 PM, Mail L

Re: Fwd: Updates next steps

2010-04-24 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 20:11 -0500, charles zeitler wrote: > Thoughts? What is the best way to accomplish these two things? The best way is to leave it alone. Let the user decide when he wants to update. I can't see what problem this is supposed to be the answer to. If the Package Update thing is

Re: Fwd: Updates next steps

2010-04-23 Thread Tim
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 20:11 -0500, charles zeitler wrote: > I propose we look at two things right away: > > 1. Limit the frequency of non-critical updates to once per week in > stable releases This was brought up, here, a few weeks back, and rightly shot down in flames for being a bad thing. If

Re: Fwd: Updates next steps

2010-04-23 Thread Suvayu Ali
On Friday 23 April 2010 06:51 PM, Mail Lists wrote: >Enhance packagekit to offer update on scheduling if it doesn't already > do that - or set it to download but not update ... or whatever makes you > happy like using cron. > I think PackageKit already does that. :) >You're treeing up the

Re: Fwd: Updates next steps

2010-04-23 Thread Mail Lists
Hi: > > 1. Limit the frequency of non-critical updates to once per week in > stable releases Do not create client policy on the server side - it is way to restrictive and wont satisfy the client needs of many. And, not using the full bandwidth is very suboptimal. (Like a 30 minute lawn wate

Re: Updates next steps

2010-04-23 Thread Tom Horsley
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 20:11:53 -0500 charles zeitler wrote: > Thoughts? What is the best way to accomplish these two things? How about just disabling the stupid applet that so frenetically wants to nag you about updating, and only updating manually when you feel like it? Works for me, and I don't

Fwd: Updates next steps

2010-04-23 Thread charles zeitler
Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law. -- Forwarded message -- From: William Jon McCann Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:02:47 -0400 Subject: Updates next steps To: Discussions about development for the Fedora desktop Hey folks, We discussed this a bit on IRC yesterday