On 10/18/20 8:18 AM, Andrew Wood wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm using Fedora 32 workstation. I'm wondering if it is updating
> properly - especially that some of the mirrors which it uses, aren't
> pulling the updates. It's a guess at the problem ...
It sounds like you may be using gnome-software which co
Hello,
I'm using Fedora 32 workstation. I'm wondering if it is updating
properly - especially that some of the mirrors which it uses, aren't
pulling the updates. It's a guess at the problem ...
I thought I'd check the version of F32 and so I checked the version
Settings->About on the Gnome D
On 20/01/14 11:11 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jan 2014 10:58:04 -0500
Franklin McCormick wrote:
Updated my Fedora 19 box this morning which included new versions of
openjdk.
When Yum got to the cleanup stage it spewed out this:
Ignore it, it just mean you haven't used alternates
On Mon, 20 Jan 2014 10:58:04 -0500
Franklin McCormick wrote:
> Updated my Fedora 19 box this morning which included new versions of
> openjdk.
>
> When Yum got to the cleanup stage it spewed out this:
>
Ignore it, it just mean you haven't used alternates
___
Regards,
Frank
www.frankly3d.com
2014/1/20 Franklin McCormick
> Updated my Fedora 19 box this morning which included new versions of
> openjdk.
>
> When Yum got to the cleanup stage it spewed out this:
>
> Cleanup: 1:java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.60-2.4.4.0.fc19.i686
> 31/32
> /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.
Updated my Fedora 19 box this morning which included new versions of
openjdk.
When Yum got to the cleanup stage it spewed out this:
Cleanup: 1:java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.60-2.4.4.0.fc19.i686
31/32
/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.60-2.4.4.0.fc19.i386/jre/bin/java
On 09/18/2013 09:48 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 18.09.2013 15:39, schrieb Frank:
Got this this morning...is it a problem on my end or theirs?
"should report this problem to the owner of the updates-testing repository"
is pretty clear, see below, "yum upgrade" works without these warnings
[fr
Am 18.09.2013 15:39, schrieb Frank:
> Got this this morning...is it a problem on my end or theirs?
"should report this problem to the owner of the updates-testing repository"
is pretty clear, see below, "yum upgrade" works without these warnings
> [frank@localhost ~]$ sudo yum check-update
> Lo
Hi all
Got this this morning...is it a problem on my end or theirs?
[frank@localhost ~]$ sudo yum check-update
Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit
Update notice FEDORA-2013-13577 (from updates-testing) is broken, or a
bad duplicate, skipping.
You should report this problem to the own
On 01/26/2013 04:02 PM, Aaron Gray wrote:
> Sorry I decided to do a netboot reinstall and everything seems fine now.
> There maybe a problem with updates from the install DVD or I may have had a
> system problem, or I may have been hacked. My Windows 8 has been hacked on
> 3 occasions now over the
, Aaron Gray wrote:
> On 25 January 2013 05:20, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>> On 01/25/2013 10:31 AM, Aaron Gray wrote:
>> > On 25 January 2013 00:51, Ed Greshko > ed.gres...@greshko.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On 01/25/2013 08:32 AM, Aaron Gray wrote:
>&g
On 25 January 2013 05:20, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 01/25/2013 10:31 AM, Aaron Gray wrote:
> > On 25 January 2013 00:51, Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com>> wrote:
> >
> > On 01/25/2013 08:32 AM, Aaron Gray wrote:
> > > Is anyone experiencing updat
Hi!
2013/1/25 Aaron Gray
>
>
> Thanks for the reply. I need to know what logs to supply. I am not used to
> Gnome 3 or system or any of the new fangled things since old Fedora 14. Its
> all a bit new to me.
>
>
I would look at /var/log/messages and at ~/.xsession-errors
Greetings,
--
Jorge Ma
On 01/25/2013 10:31 AM, Aaron Gray wrote:
> On 25 January 2013 00:51, Ed Greshko <mailto:ed.gres...@greshko.com>> wrote:
>
> On 01/25/2013 08:32 AM, Aaron Gray wrote:
> > Is anyone experiencing update problems with Fedora at the moment ?
> >
> >
On 25 January 2013 00:51, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 01/25/2013 08:32 AM, Aaron Gray wrote:
> > Is anyone experiencing update problems with Fedora at the moment ?
> >
> > I keep getting restarts and Gnome 3 boot failures into old desktop.
> >
> > Then restart and I
On 01/25/2013 08:32 AM, Aaron Gray wrote:
> Is anyone experiencing update problems with Fedora at the moment ?
>
> I keep getting restarts and Gnome 3 boot failures into old desktop.
>
> Then restart and I get Gnome 3 again after a restart and then it wants to do
> update
Hi,
Is anyone experiencing update problems with Fedora at the moment ?
I keep getting restarts and Gnome 3 boot failures into old desktop.
Then restart and I get Gnome 3 again after a restart and then it wants to
do updates again.
And the whole thing goes in a circle.
Aaron
--
users mailing
On 12/02/2011 10:17 PM, Craig White wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 22:07 -0500, Elliott Chapin wrote:
>> On 12/02/2011 08:28 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 03.12.2011 01:24, schrieb Elliott Chapin:
On 12/02/2011 06:35 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> remove weak supported external packa
On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 22:07 -0500, Elliott Chapin wrote:
> On 12/02/2011 08:28 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >
> >
> > Am 03.12.2011 01:24, schrieb Elliott Chapin:
> >> On 12/02/2011 06:35 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >>> remove weak supported external packages for the upgrade
> >>
> >> Specifically?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/02/2011 08:28 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 03.12.2011 01:24, schrieb Elliott Chapin:
>> On 12/02/2011 06:35 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> remove weak supported external packages for the upgrade
>>
>> Specifically?
>
> the kmod-packages an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/02/2011 08:28 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 03.12.2011 01:24, schrieb Elliott Chapin:
>> On 12/02/2011 06:35 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> remove weak supported external packages for the upgrade
>>
>> Specifically?
>
> the kmod-packages an
Am 03.12.2011 01:24, schrieb Elliott Chapin:
> On 12/02/2011 06:35 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> remove weak supported external packages for the upgrade
>
> Specifically?
the kmod-packages and the crap listed which was built
against the old ffmpeg-libraries and no update available
signature.as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/02/2011 06:35 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> remove weak supported external packages for the upgrade
Specifically?
> and make sure that "package-cleanup --problems" gives no
Done, already posted.
> warning
>
- --
clients.teksavvy.com/~echapin
remove weak supported external packages for the upgrade
and make sure that "package-cleanup --problems" gives no
warning
Am 03.12.2011 00:24, schrieb Elliott Chapin:
> I hope this helps break up my logjam. Following is amended output from
> yum update and yum update --skip-broken:
>
> Skipped (de
I hope this helps break up my logjam. Following is amended output from
yum update and yum update --skip-broken:
Skipped (dependency problems):
firefoxx86_64
8.0-3.fc16 updates
18 M
xulrunner
My system working OK, but;
package-cleanup --problems
Loaded plugins: langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit
Package kmod-wl-2.6.40.3-0.fc15.x86_64-5.60.48.36-2.fc15.7.x86_64
requires kernel-uname-r = ('0', '2.6.40.3', '0.fc15.x86_64')
Package xdtv-2.4.1-0.6cvs15.fc12.x86_64 requires libavcodec.so.
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 19:09:45 +0530
Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > While attempting to update livna-config-display which showed up
> > yesterday, I get these errors:
> >
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> > File "/usr/share/PackageKit/helpers/yum/yumBackend.py", line
> > 2759, in install_signatu
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 09:32 -0400, Steve Blackwell wrote:
> # uname -a
> Linux steve.blackwell 2.6.32.21-166.fc12.i686 #1 SMP Fri Aug 27
> 06:55:23 UTC 2010 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
>
> # rpm -qa | grep yum
> yum-plugin-fastestmirror-1.1.26-1.fc12.noarch
> anaconda-yum-plugins-1.0-5.fc12.noarch
>
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 09:32 -0400, Steve Blackwell wrote:
> # uname -a
> Linux steve.blackwell 2.6.32.21-166.fc12.i686 #1 SMP Fri Aug 27
> 06:55:23 UTC 2010 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
>
> # rpm -qa | grep yum
> yum-plugin-fastestmirror-1.1.26-1.fc12.noarch
> anaconda-yum-plugins-1.0-5.fc12.noarch
>
# uname -a
Linux steve.blackwell 2.6.32.21-166.fc12.i686 #1 SMP Fri Aug 27
06:55:23 UTC 2010 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
# rpm -qa | grep yum
yum-plugin-fastestmirror-1.1.26-1.fc12.noarch
anaconda-yum-plugins-1.0-5.fc12.noarch
PackageKit-yum-0.5.7-2.fc12.i686
yum-3.2.28-3.fc12.noarch
yum-updatesd-0.9
1 correction and a few typos removed:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
>
>> Updates were available:
>>
>> Total size: 181 M
>> Is this ok [y/N]: y
>> Downloading Packages:
>> Running rpm_check_debug
>> ERROR with rpm_che
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
> Updates were available:
>
> Total size: 181 M
> Is this ok [y/N]: y
> Downloading Packages:
> Running rpm_check_debug
> ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve:
> kernel-uname-r = 2.6.30.9-96.fc11.x86_64 is needed by (installed)
> kmod-nvidia-
Updates were available:
Total size: 181 M
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
Running rpm_check_debug
ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve:
kernel-uname-r = 2.6.30.9-96.fc11.x86_64 is needed by (installed)
kmod-nvidia-2.6.30.9-96.fc11.x86_64-190.42-1.fc11.1.x86_64
kernel-uname-r = 2.6.30.9
33 matches
Mail list logo
