On 06/27/2010 05:37 PM, Remi Collet wrote:
>> You are correct, I stand corrected. The enigmain main page only states
>> 32-bit, but when you click on the download page you can get the 64-bit
>> version.
>
> addons.mozilla only provides extensions for official package.
> And mozilla only provides 3
> You are correct, I stand corrected. The enigmain main page only states
> 32-bit, but when you click on the download page you can get the 64-bit
> version.
addons.mozilla only provides extensions for official package.
And mozilla only provides 32 bits build of Firefox.
All 64 bits package are on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/26/2010 09:49 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
> Le 26/06/2010 16:32, Steven Stern a écrit :
>> Enigmail's help files indicate that it may have something to do with
>> getting a version compiled to be compatible with "your distribution".
>> As far as I c
On 06/27/2010 11:13 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 06/27/2010 10:59 AM, Jerry Feldman wrote:
>>> maybe you should have a look at;
>>>
>>>http://enigmail.mozdev.org/news/index.php
>>>
>>>
>> I was just curious to see if I could get T-Bird and enigmail to ignore
>> the version warning. AFAIK, e
On 06/27/2010 10:59 AM, Jerry Feldman wrote:
>>
>> maybe you should have a look at;
>>
>>http://enigmail.mozdev.org/news/index.php
>>
>>
> I was just curious to see if I could get T-Bird and enigmail to ignore
> the version warning. AFAIK, enigmail has never really supported 64-bits.
> The only
On 06/26/2010 12:00 PM, g wrote:
> Jerry Feldman wrote:
>
>
>> I'm running 64-bit 3.1 with enigmail 1.01 with no problem.
> interesting. [note link below]
>
> 1.01? or do you mean 1.0.1?
>
> makes me wonder why enigmail folks came out with enigmail 1.1.1 and do not
> have a 64 bit version for thu
Jerry Feldman wrote:
> I'm running 64-bit 3.1 with enigmail 1.01 with no problem.
interesting. [note link below]
1.01? or do you mean 1.0.1?
makes me wonder why enigmail folks came out with enigmail 1.1.1 and do not
have a 64 bit version for thunderbird 3.1 64 bit yet.
maybe you should have a
Le 26/06/2010 16:32, Steven Stern a écrit :
> Enigmail's help files indicate that it may have something to do with
> getting a version compiled to be compatible with "your distribution".
> As far as I can tell, only 1.0.1 is in rpmfusion, so I'll wait a few
> days and try again.
Version "compati
On 06/26/2010 01:56 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 06/26/2010 02:54 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>> On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 14:47 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I don't use that repository...so it is meaningless to me. :-)
>>>
>> Your call, but you don't need to have it enabled permanently (I don
On 06/26/2010 01:17 AM, g wrote:
> Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>
>> I just downloaded and installed tbird 3.1.1 RC2 and enigmail 1.1.
>>
>> Works fine on F13 under KDE.
> did you install tb 3.1.1 to /usr/local/ or /usr/lib/?
>
> enigmail 1.1 or 1.1.1?
I'm running 64-bit 3.1 with enigmail 1.01 with no pro
On 06/26/2010 02:54 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 14:47 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>>
>> I don't use that repository...so it is meaningless to me. :-)
>>
> Your call, but you don't need to have it enabled permanently (I don't).
> Just do:
>
> yum --enablerepo=updat
On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 14:47 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 06/26/2010 02:46 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 14:29 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> >
> >> Since we are talking about TB 3.1.1 and since the most recent version
> >> available via the F13 repository is 3.0.5-1 ...
On 06/26/2010 02:46 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 14:29 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>> Since we are talking about TB 3.1.1 and since the most recent version
>> available via the F13 repository is 3.0.5-1 ... :-)
>>
> TB 3.1 has been pushed to updates-testing.
>
>
>
Ed Greshko wrote:
> Since we are talking about TB 3.1.1 and since the most recent version
> available via the F13 repository is 3.0.5-1 ... :-)
ok. i have not installed f13 or reinstalled f12 yet, i was not able to
check versions and did not recall what was being used.
i use scientific linux 5
On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 14:29 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> Since we are talking about TB 3.1.1 and since the most recent version
> available via the F13 repository is 3.0.5-1 ... :-)
TB 3.1 has been pushed to updates-testing.
poc
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe o
>>> did you install tb 3.1.1 to /usr/local/ or /usr/lib/?
>>>
>>>
>> /usr/local/mozilla/thunderbird
>>
> interesting.
>
> was that a 'yum' from fedora, or did you pull from mozilla?
>
Since we are talking about TB 3.1.1 and since the most recent version
available via the F13 reposit
Ed Greshko wrote:
>> did you install tb 3.1.1 to /usr/local/ or /usr/lib/?
>>
> /usr/local/mozilla/thunderbird
interesting.
was that a 'yum' from fedora, or did you pull from mozilla?
if yum, did you redirect it?
if pulled from mozilla, that was default?
>> enigmail 1.1 or 1.1.1?
>>
> 1.1.1
Le 26/06/2010 05:39, Steven Stern a écrit :
> Does anyone have enigmail 1.1 working with Thunderbird 3.1?
>
> I've installed tbird 3.1 in /usr/local and updated enigmail to version
> 1.1. When I start, it says it's unable to start gpg-agent. gpg-agent is
> installed, from the rpm gnupg2-2.0.14-
On 06/26/2010 01:17 PM, g wrote:
>
>> I just downloaded and installed tbird 3.1.1 RC2 and enigmail 1.1.
>>
>> Works fine on F13 under KDE.
>>
> did you install tb 3.1.1 to /usr/local/ or /usr/lib/?
>
/usr/local/mozilla/thunderbird
> enigmail 1.1 or 1.1.1?
>
1.1.1
--
Happiness isn't
Ed Greshko wrote:
> I just downloaded and installed tbird 3.1.1 RC2 and enigmail 1.1.
>
> Works fine on F13 under KDE.
did you install tb 3.1.1 to /usr/local/ or /usr/lib/?
enigmail 1.1 or 1.1.1?
>
> Ed
>
>
--
peace out.
tc,hago.
g
.
in a free world without fences, who needs ga
On 06/26/2010 11:39 AM, Steven Stern wrote:
> Does anyone have enigmail 1.1 working with Thunderbird 3.1?
>
> I've installed tbird 3.1 in /usr/local and updated enigmail to version
> 1.1. When I start, it says it's unable to start gpg-agent. gpg-agent is
> installed, from the rpm gnupg2-2.0.14-2
Steven Stern wrote:
> Does anyone have enigmail 1.1 working with Thunderbird 3.1?
>
> I've installed tbird 3.1 in /usr/local and updated enigmail to version
> 1.1. When I start, it says it's unable to start gpg-agent. gpg-agent is
> installed, from the rpm gnupg2-2.0.14-2.fc13.i686
enigmail v1
Does anyone have enigmail 1.1 working with Thunderbird 3.1?
I've installed tbird 3.1 in /usr/local and updated enigmail to version
1.1. When I start, it says it's unable to start gpg-agent. gpg-agent is
installed, from the rpm gnupg2-2.0.14-2.fc13.i686
--
-- Steve
--
users mailing list
user
23 matches
Mail list logo
