On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 16:51, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 13:05:47 -0200, AC (Andre) wrote:
>
> > Maybe if there
> > was a similar documentation explaining to "old dogs" (myself included)
> how
> > to do SysV tasks the systemd way, transition would be easier. I know the
> > inf
On Sunday 13 November 2011 07:22:51 T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
> Yay for unicode bugs! Fixed in chksystemd-2 (along with a brown paper
> bag bug that made the "reset" action not work), which is now available
> at http://tchol.org/chksystemd/
>
> > Hope this helps.
> >
> > PS: I think this is a ve
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 13:05:47 -0200, AC (Andre) wrote:
> Maybe if there
> was a similar documentation explaining to "old dogs" (myself included) how
> to do SysV tasks the systemd way, transition would be easier. I know the
> information is probably already on all the manpages somehow, but I'm
> ta
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 14:55:55 +, MC (mike) wrote:
> I would like to see something in systemctl to achieve what used to be
> done with "service iptables save" - as another poster already said one
> can manually do:
> iptables-save > /etc/sysconfig/iptables
>
> Most daemon controls were done wit
On 11/13/2011 10:07 PM, Fedora User wrote:
> SystemD fixes what weren't broke ;-) Seriously. It's easier to
> eliminate it all and just script everything in rc.local.
Not for any serious distribution developer or system administrator and
btw, it is spelled "systemd"
Rahul
--
users mailing list
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 09:35:01 -0700
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> sorry, I meant:
>
> systemctl list-unit-files | grep enabled
>
> kevin
That almost does it, but there is still something
slightly different:
[root@zooty ~]# ls /etc/systemd/system/*.wants/*.service | wc -l
31
[root@zooty ~]# systemctl li
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 08:34:59 -0700
stan wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 09:17:41 -0500
> Tom Horsley wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 22:15:00 -0700
> > Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > > systemctl list-unit-files
> > >
> > > give you any of what you are looking for?
> >
> > That tells me what units
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 09:17:41 -0500
Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 22:15:00 -0700
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > systemctl list-unit-files
> >
> > give you any of what you are looking for?
>
> That tells me what units are available, not
> what units are enabled to be started at boot.
sor
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 08:34:59 -0700
stan wrote:
> How about
> systemctl -a -t service | less
> and if you want only active services
> systemctl -a -t service | grep -e " active " | less
> or inactive similarly
> systemctl -a -t service | grep -e " inactive " | less
Still not the same, a service m
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 15:22, T.C. Hollingsworth
wrote:
>> UnicodeEncodeError: 'ascii' codec can't encode character u'\u2502' in
>> position 0: ordinal not in range(128)
>
> Yay for unicode bugs! Fixed in chksystemd-2 (along with a brown paper
> bag bug that made the "reset" action not work), wh
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 09:17:41 -0500
Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 22:15:00 -0700
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > systemctl list-unit-files
> >
> > give you any of what you are looking for?
>
> That tells me what units are available, not
> what units are enabled to be started at boot.
How
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 12:22, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 12:41:14 +
> mike cloaked wrote:
>
> > Whilst we are on the subject can someone tell me what the systemd
> > equivalent is for the command "service iptables save" ?
>
> I always just run the iptables-save program directly
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 11/13/2011 04:42 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
>
>>
>> Unfortunately, chkconfig itself doesn't translate to systemd well.
>> However, this thread got me thinking that there is a need for a
>> chkconfig-like tool for systemd. So, I wrote
On 11/13/2011 04:42 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, chkconfig itself doesn't translate to systemd well.
> However, this thread got me thinking that there is a need for a
> chkconfig-like tool for systemd. So, I wrote one:
>
> http://tchol.org/chksystemd/
Perhaps patches to sys
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 6:46 AM, suvayu ali wrote:
> I can't seem to pipe the output or redirect it to a file. Try either
> of those gives me this backtrace:
>
> graphical.target
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/chksystemd", line 241, in
> main()
> File "/usr/bin/chksyst
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 12:41:14 +
mike cloaked wrote:
> Whilst we are on the subject can someone tell me what the systemd
> equivalent is for the command "service iptables save" ?
I always just run the iptables-save program directly and
redirect output to /etc/sysconfig/iptables if you really
wa
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 22:15:00 -0700
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> systemctl list-unit-files
>
> give you any of what you are looking for?
That tells me what units are available, not
what units are enabled to be started at boot.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 12:34, T.C. Hollingsworth
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 4:22 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
>> 404 on the rpm
>
> Fixed. Sorry about that!
>
I can't seem to pipe the output or redirect it to a file. Try either
of those gives me this backtrace:
graphical.target
Tracebac
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 11:12 AM, T.C. Hollingsworth
wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
>> On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 00:00:13 -0500
>> Fedora User wrote:
>>
>>> The system does seem to
>>> boot faster but this is really arcane compared to sysV which seemed
>>> very straightfo
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 4:22 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> 404 on the rpm
Fixed. Sorry about that!
-T.C.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wi
On 11/13/2011 07:29 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 11/13/2011 07:22 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
>> On 13/11/11 11:12, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
>>
>>> -T.C.
>> 404 on the rpm
>>
>>
> Fine from here...
>
Oooopss wrong link NOT fine from here...
--
Even if you do learn to speak correct English, whom
On 11/13/2011 07:22 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 13/11/11 11:12, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
>
>> -T.C.
> 404 on the rpm
>
>
Fine from here...
--
Even if you do learn to speak correct English, whom are you going to
speak it to? -- Clarence Darrow
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.or
On 13/11/11 11:12, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
> -T.C.
404 on the rpm
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of fedoraproject.org
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Gui
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 00:00:13 -0500
> Fedora User wrote:
>
>> The system does seem to
>> boot faster but this is really arcane compared to sysV which seemed
>> very straightforward.
>
> Arcane is the word. One big problem is the complete
> lack
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 00:10:36 -0500
Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 00:00:13 -0500
> Fedora User wrote:
>
> > The system does seem to
> > boot faster but this is really arcane compared to sysV which seemed
> > very straightforward.
>
> Arcane is the word. One big problem is the complete
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 00:00:13 -0500
Fedora User wrote:
> The system does seem to
> boot faster but this is really arcane compared to sysV which seemed
> very straightforward.
Arcane is the word. One big problem is the complete
lack of anything like chkconfig --list for systemd
services (it would b
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:27:34 -0700
"T.C. Hollingsworth" wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Fedora User
> wrote:
> > I've been doing this since RH 7.3. I'm an old fart and I don't do
> > change well. There are 49 SystemD man pages. Each one is more
> > esoteric than the Talmud. Seriously.
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 16:53:05 -0700
"T.C. Hollingsworth" wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Genes MailLists
> wrote:
> > On 11/11/2011 09:27 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
> > \
> >>
> >> systemd replaces numerical runlevels with named "targets". Apart
> >> from that, it works very simila
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 11/11/2011 09:27 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
> \
>>
>> systemd replaces numerical runlevels with named "targets". Apart from
>> that, it works very similar to how chkconfig works under the hood.
>> "chkconfig --level 3 squid off" ess
On 11/11/2011 09:27 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
\
>
> systemd replaces numerical runlevels with named "targets". Apart from
> that, it works very similar to how chkconfig works under the hood.
> "chkconfig --level 3 squid off" essentially just does "rm
> /etc/rc3.d/squid". "chkconfig --level 5
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Fedora User wrote:
> I've been doing this since RH 7.3. I'm an old fart and I don't do change
> well. There are 49 SystemD man pages. Each one is more esoteric than the
> Talmud. Seriously. "Chkconfig" made perfect sense to me. I just need one
> example to figure i
I've been doing this since RH 7.3. I'm an old fart and I don't do change
well. There are 49 SystemD man pages. Each one is more esoteric than the
Talmud. Seriously. "Chkconfig" made perfect sense to me. I just need one
example to figure it all out.
If I want squid to start in L-5 but not L-3. Wha
32 matches
Mail list logo
