Re: Strange behavior with F40 server iso and VM

2024-10-14 Thread Peter Boy Uni
> Am 14.10.2024 um 05:28 schrieb Tim via users : > > On Mon, 2024-10-14 at 00:04 +0200, Peter Boy Uni wrote: >> Server follows the good old Unix principle to strictly separate user >> data from system data, and furthermore separates different user data >> from each other. The goal is to minimize

Re: Strange behavior with F40 server iso and VM

2024-10-14 Thread Tim via users
Tim: >> I'm wondering what *less* user data separation means? Barry: > I assume it means using btrfs to put / and /home into the same file system. > For a server the data that the server handles is in a separate file system. > > The trade offs for a server and a desktop and different. > The bit

Re: Strange behavior with F40 server iso and VM

2024-10-14 Thread Barry
S > On 14 Oct 2024, at 04:30, Tim via users wrote: > > I'm wondering what *less* user data separation means? I assume it means using btrfs to put / and /home into the same file system. For a server the data that the server handles is in a separate file system. The trade offs for a server and a

Re: Strange behavior with F40 server iso and VM

2024-10-13 Thread Tim via users
On Mon, 2024-10-14 at 00:04 +0200, Peter Boy Uni wrote: > Server follows the good old Unix principle to strictly separate user > data from system data, and furthermore separates different user data > from each other. The goal is to minimize the effects of possible file > system problems. Workstatio

Re: Strange behavior with F40 server iso and VM

2024-10-13 Thread Peter Boy Uni
> Am 13.10.2024 um 03:12 schrieb Paolo Galtieri : > > I'm using the Fedora-Server-dvd-x86_64-40-1.14.iso which I downloaded from > the Fedora repository. After I booted the system I ran df and got: > > pgaltieri@localhost:~$ df > Filesystem 1K-blocksUsed Available Use% Mounte

Re: Strange behavior with F40 server iso and VM

2024-10-13 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Oct 13, 2024, at 12:03, Paolo Galtieri wrote: > > So how do I access that 400 GB partition after I boot my server? Perhaps the Server documentation assumes you understand how LVM works and you know the commands for modifying the storage after the install. I suggest going back to the link I

Re: Strange behavior with F40 server iso and VM

2024-10-13 Thread Go Canes
On Sun, Oct 13, 2024 at 12:03 PM Paolo Galtieri wrote: > I did a little more investigating by running fdisk -l and here is what I > found on my server install: > > Disk /dev/nvme0n1: 400 GiB, 429496729600 bytes, 838860800 sectors > Disk model: VMware Virtual NVMe Disk > Units: sectors of 1 * 512

Re: Strange behavior with F40 server iso and VM

2024-10-13 Thread Paolo Galtieri
I did a little more investigating by running fdisk -l and here is what I found on my server install: Disk /dev/nvme0n1: 400 GiB, 429496729600 bytes, 838860800 sectors Disk model: VMware Virtual NVMe Disk Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes

Re: Strange behavior with F40 server iso and VM

2024-10-13 Thread Paolo Galtieri
That's what I thougt, except it didn't. After adding other packages it got to 94% full and I kept getting pop-ups about my disk being full. The install of the MATE desktop iso showed the disk allocated at the 400GB I requested. Paolo On Sat, Oct 12, 2024, 6:28 PM Jonathan Billings wrote: > On

Re: Strange behavior with F40 server iso and VM

2024-10-12 Thread Stephen Morris via users
On 13/10/24 11:17, Paolo Galtieri wrote: Folks,  this is an issue that has me frustrated.  I created a VM under VMware and VirtualBox and allocated 400GB as the disk size.  I installed the F40 server iso on the VM, and it showed the disk size as 400GB, and the install went fine.  However, when

Re: Strange behavior with F40 server iso and VM

2024-10-12 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Oct 12, 2024, at 20:17, Paolo Galtieri wrote: > > Folks, > this is an issue that has me frustrated. I created a VM under VMware and > VirtualBox and allocated 400GB as the disk size. I installed the F40 server > iso on the VM, and it showed the disk size as 400GB, and the install went >

Re: Strange behavior with F40 server iso and VM

2024-10-12 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 8:17 PM Paolo Galtieri wrote: > > Folks, > this is an issue that has me frustrated. I created a VM under VMware > and VirtualBox and allocated 400GB as the disk size. I installed the > F40 server iso on the VM, and it showed the disk size as 400GB, and the > install wen

Re: Strange behavior with F40 server iso and VM

2024-10-12 Thread Paolo Galtieri
I'm using the Fedora-Server-dvd-x86_64-40-1.14.iso which I downloaded from the Fedora repository.  After I booted the system I ran df and got: pgaltieri@localhost:~$ df Filesystem  1K-blocks    Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/fedora-root  15663104 1763300  13899804  12% /

Re: Strange behavior with F40 server iso and VM

2024-10-12 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 10/12/24 5:17 PM, Paolo Galtieri wrote: Folks,  this is an issue that has me frustrated.  I created a VM under VMware and VirtualBox and allocated 400GB as the disk size.  I installed the F40 server iso on the VM, and it showed the disk size as 400GB, and the install went fine.  However, w

Strange behavior with F40 server iso and VM

2024-10-12 Thread Paolo Galtieri
Folks,  this is an issue that has me frustrated.  I created a VM under VMware and VirtualBox and allocated 400GB as the disk size.  I installed the F40 server iso on the VM, and it showed the disk size as 400GB, and the install went fine.  However, when I booted the VM and looked at the disk s