On Wed, 2018-08-22 at 13:59 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> I would suggest trying to get your own openvpn config working if
> possible. There might be a script that the binary uses to configure the
> routing, see if you can find that. Try running "strings" on the binary.
> You could also just c
Patrick O'Callaghan
> > > ha scritto:
> > > > Has anyone got this to work in Fedora? To be clear, split
> > > tunnelling
> > > > is
> > > > when network traffic to some destinations (or for some apps) is
> > > > tunnelled over
Il giorno mar 21 ago 2018 alle 11:46, Patrick O'Callaghan
ha scritto:
On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 09:10 +0200, Federico Bruni wrote:
Il giorno lun 20 ago 2018 alle 14:03, Patrick O'Callaghan
ha scritto:
> Has anyone got this to work in Fedora? To be clear, split
tunnelling
On 08/23/18 09:15, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 08/22/2018 02:56 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> I've never been a fan of the "route" command.
>>
>> How about the output of "netstat -rn" instead? In my case...
>
> The output is almost identical except that route gives you the metric as
> well.
> What's wron
On 08/22/2018 04:49 PM, Mike Wright wrote:
On 08/22/2018 01:59 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 08/22/2018 08:59 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
This is the routing table with the VPN enabled (the virbr stuff is from
a VM, not relevant here):
(I rearranged the table.)
$ route
Kernel IP routing tabl
On 08/22/2018 02:56 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
I've never been a fan of the "route" command.
How about the output of "netstat -rn" instead? In my case...
The output is almost identical except that route gives you the metric as
well. What's wrong with the route command other than it is deprecated
On 08/22/2018 01:59 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 08/22/2018 08:59 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
This is the routing table with the VPN enabled (the virbr stuff is from
a VM, not relevant here):
(I rearranged the table.)
$ route
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask
On 08/22/18 23:59, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> This is the routing table with the VPN enabled (the virbr stuff is from
> a VM, not relevant here):
I've never been a fan of the "route" command.
How about the output of "netstat -rn" instead? In my case...
No VPN
[egreshko@meimei ~]$ netstat -r
On 08/23/18 05:56, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 08/22/18 23:59, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>> This is the routing table with the VPN enabled (the virbr stuff is from
>> a VM, not relevant here):
>
> I've never been a fan of the "route" command.
>
> How about the output of "netstat -rn" instead? In my ca
On 08/22/2018 08:59 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
This is the routing table with the VPN enabled (the virbr stuff is from
a VM, not relevant here):
(I rearranged the table.)
$ route
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface
0.0.0.0
On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 15:15 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 08/21/2018 09:08 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > It works as far as it goes, but still no split tunnel. I suspect the
> > (provider-supplied *binary*) connection script is forcing all traffic
> > through the tunnel. Looks like I'll have
On 08/21/2018 09:08 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
It works as far as it goes, but still no split tunnel. I suspect the
(provider-supplied *binary*) connection script is forcing all traffic
through the tunnel. Looks like I'll have to play with OpenVPN using the
provider's credentials and see if I
On 08/21/2018 02:49 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Mon, 2018-08-20 at 09:46 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
However, my openvpn connection only routes the private network subnets,
everything else goes over the regular network connection.
I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "private network
On 08/21/2018 04:21 AM, j.witvl...@mindef.nl wrote:
VPN-server processes can push routing info, and DNS-server addresses.
AFAICR systems accept three DNS-resolvers.
This can be tricky. If the VPN-process pushes three resolvers, the old ones
will be gone (while the tunnel exists),
Thus you are un
ago 2018 alle 14:03, Patrick O'Callaghan
> > > > ha scritto:
> > > > > Has anyone got this to work in Fedora? To be clear, split tunnelling
> > > > > is
> > > > > when network traffic to some destinations (or for some apps) is
> >
On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 11:21 +, j.witvl...@mindef.nl wrote:
> See comment below.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Patrick O'Callaghan [mailto:pocallag...@gmail.com]
> Sent: dinsdag 21 augustus 2018 11:49
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: Sp
> Has anyone got this to work in Fedora? To be clear, split tunnelling
> > > > is
> > > > when network traffic to some destinations (or for some apps) is
> > > > tunnelled over a VPN, while the rest of the traffic goes through
> > > > normal
>
See comment below.
-Original Message-
From: Patrick O'Callaghan [mailto:pocallag...@gmail.com]
Sent: dinsdag 21 augustus 2018 11:49
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: Split tunnelling
On Mon, 2018-08-20 at 09:46 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 08/20/2018 05:03 AM,
On 08/21/18 17:46, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 09:10 +0200, Federico Bruni wrote:
>> Il giorno lun 20 ago 2018 alle 14:03, Patrick O'Callaghan
>> ha scritto:
>>> Has anyone got this to work in Fedora? To be clear, split tunnelling
>&
On Mon, 2018-08-20 at 09:46 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 08/20/2018 05:03 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > Has anyone got this to work in Fedora? To be clear, split tunnelling is
> > when network traffic to some destinations (or for some apps) is
> > tunnelled over a
On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 09:10 +0200, Federico Bruni wrote:
>
> Il giorno lun 20 ago 2018 alle 14:03, Patrick O'Callaghan
> ha scritto:
> > Has anyone got this to work in Fedora? To be clear, split tunnelling
> > is
> > when network traffic to some destinations (or
Il giorno lun 20 ago 2018 alle 14:03, Patrick O'Callaghan
ha scritto:
Has anyone got this to work in Fedora? To be clear, split tunnelling
is
when network traffic to some destinations (or for some apps) is
tunnelled over a VPN, while the rest of the traffic goes through
normal
cha
On 08/20/2018 05:03 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Has anyone got this to work in Fedora? To be clear, split tunnelling is
when network traffic to some destinations (or for some apps) is
tunnelled over a VPN, while the rest of the traffic goes through normal
channels. I've tried me
On Mon, 2018-08-20 at 14:30 +0200, None via users wrote:
> You can do this with ovpn by pushing routes trough ovpn connection. Not
> per app perse, I do hope I get your question the correct way.
> maybe look at this:
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/OpenVPN#Routing_client_traffic_through_th
On Mon, 2018-08-20 at 21:36 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 08/20/18 20:03, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > Has anyone got this to work in Fedora? To be clear, split tunnelling is
> > when network traffic to some destinations (or for some apps) is
> > tunnelled over a
On 08/20/18 20:03, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Has anyone got this to work in Fedora? To be clear, split tunnelling is
> when network traffic to some destinations (or for some apps) is
> tunnelled over a VPN, while the rest of the traffic goes through normal
> channels. I'
not differ all that much with
Fedora.
Kind regards,
Maikel
On 2018-08-20 14:03, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Has anyone got this to work in Fedora? To be clear, split tunnelling is
when network traffic to some destinations (or for some apps) is
tunnelled over a VPN, while the rest of the tr
Has anyone got this to work in Fedora? To be clear, split tunnelling is
when network traffic to some destinations (or for some apps) is
tunnelled over a VPN, while the rest of the traffic goes through normal
channels. I've tried messing with network namespaces, which would seem
to be the way
28 matches
Mail list logo
