On Tue, 2016-02-09 at 03:59 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 12:33:53AM +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > I've been using VirtualBox for several years with generally good
> > results, but decided to try KVM as an alternative. I've converted a
> > Windows VM from VBox to KV
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 12:33:53AM +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I've been using VirtualBox for several years with generally good
> results, but decided to try KVM as an alternative. I've converted a
> Windows VM from VBox to KVM format and it works well enough for my
> needs (it may even be
On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 22:13 +, Earl Ramirez wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 17:43 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 12:35 +0900, Earl A Ramirez wrote:
> > > > Clearly this could be done using Samba or NFS. Is there an
> > > > easier
> > > > way?
> > >
> > > Personally
On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 17:43 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 12:35 +0900, Earl A Ramirez wrote:
> > > Clearly this could be done using Samba or NFS. Is there an easier
> > > way?
> >
> > Personally I have been using Samba, haven't seen an easier way.
>
> Yes, that seems t
On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 12:35 +0900, Earl A Ramirez wrote:
> > Clearly this could be done using Samba or NFS. Is there an easier
> > way?
>
> Personally I have been using Samba, haven't seen an easier way.
Yes, that seems to be the way to go. I'm almost there (having figured
out that I needed to op
On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 16:18 +0100, thibaut noah wrote:
> Depending on the type of datas you have, the easiest way would be to
> have
> something like a nas and access to your data through network.
> This way there will no problem accessing your datas from both host
> and
> guest.
> A similar way to
On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 14:50 +, Junk wrote:
>
> If you are using virt-manager to manage the the VM add a disk and
> have a look at the different disk types I think there may be a
> filesystem option, although I don't have a machine in front of me to
> confirm it.
>
> Or put the things you nee
Depending on the type of datas you have, the easiest way would be to have
something like a nas and access to your data through network.
This way there will no problem accessing your datas from both host and
guest.
A similar way to do this might be to create a docker container running with
a specifi
On 8 February 2016 03:35:32 GMT, Earl A Ramirez wrote:
>> Clearly this could be done using Samba or NFS. Is there an easier
>way?
>
>Personally I have been using Samba, haven't seen an easier way.
>
>
>
>
>--
>users mailing l
> Clearly this could be done using Samba or NFS. Is there an easier way?
Personally I have been using Samba, haven't seen an easier way.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora
I've been using VirtualBox for several years with generally good
results, but decided to try KVM as an alternative. I've converted a
Windows VM from VBox to KVM format and it works well enough for my
needs (it may even be faster), except that I can't see how to share
files between the VM and my Fed
11 matches
Mail list logo