Patrick O'Callaghan writes:
> People who interact with the forum via email will still have their own
> copies. And current email archives can be altered just as easily
> (though I don't know of any that do so).
I don't know anybody who regularly retro-mods their archives for
reasons of taste,
On 12/03/2016 03:35 PM, Tim Evans wrote:
On 12/03/2016 04:41 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 12/03/2016 01:00 PM, Tim Evans wrote:
During the boot from bootable thumb drive, several hundred messages of
the following ilk showed up:
[nn] printk messages dropped [timestamp] pcieport :00:1c.0 PCIebus
E
On 12/03/2016 04:41 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 12/03/2016 01:00 PM, Tim Evans wrote:
During the boot from bootable thumb drive, several hundred messages of
the following ilk showed up:
[nn] printk messages dropped [timestamp] pcieport :00:1c.0 PCIebus
Error: severity: corrected, type=physical l
On 08/25/2013 12:54 PM, Robert Holtzm wrote:
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 04:06:45AM -0500, g wrote:
.snip
first, let me introduce you to ixquick and their _advanced_ search page.
https://ixquick.com/eng/advanced-search.html
their feelings about "PRISM" and surveillance;
ht
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 04:06:45AM -0500, g wrote:
.snip
>
>
> first, let me introduce you to ixquick and their _advanced_ search page.
>https://ixquick.com/eng/advanced-search.html
>
> their feelings about "PRISM" and surveillance;
>https://ixquick.com/eng/prism-program-rev
On 05/04/12 10:27, Adam Tong wrote:
Not just a newbie who forgot a subject.
--
Regards,
Frank
"Jack of all, fubars"
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedor
Joe Klemmer wrote:
> Having a simple doc or web page for the changes would be a
> helpful thing, IMO.
Fedora Weekly News used to contain short, useful, informal articles.
I enjoyed it very much.
Then it suddenly changed to a kind of in-house data-sheet,
with information about committee meetings o
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011, Michael Ekstrand wrote:
>> that's a very good idea... and maybe put a shortcut on the desktop to
>> it...labeled "documentation" or something similar.
>
> I can see "Documentation" being intimidating for new users. A "Tour"
> could potentially be much friendlier. It also has
Thanks Sven, I will try with this tools too.
En 31/03/2011 07:24:13, Sven Aluoor escribió:
> More user friendly tool is "ffmpeg2theora". It's available in
> third-party repo
> http://pkgs.org/search/?keyword=ffmpeg2theora&search_on=smart&distro=0&arch=32-bit&exact=0
>
> cheers Sven
--
Using
On 07/05/2010 03:47 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> "Online Paharmacy"
>
>
>
You mean you actually clicked on the link? The windows malware folks
must love you. :-) :-)
--
Nature always sides with the hidden flaw. 葛斯克 愛德華 / 台北市八德路四段
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
users
"Online Paharmacy"
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guideline
Jeff Gamsby wrote:
> Rich Megginson wrote:
>
>> Jeff Gamsby wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Centos 5.3 x86_64
>>>
>>> 389-ds-console-doc-1.2.0-4.el5
>>> 389-ds-1.1.3-4.el5
>>> 389-admin-console-1.1.4-1.el5
>>> 389-admin-1.1.8-4.el5
>>> 389-dsgw-1.1.4-1.el5
>>> 389-ds-console-1.2.0-4.el5
>>> 389-admin-c
Jeff Gamsby wrote:
> Centos 5.3 x86_64
>
> 389-ds-console-doc-1.2.0-4.el5
> 389-ds-1.1.3-4.el5
> 389-admin-console-1.1.4-1.el5
> 389-admin-1.1.8-4.el5
> 389-dsgw-1.1.4-1.el5
> 389-ds-console-1.2.0-4.el5
> 389-admin-console-doc-1.1.4-1.el5
> 389-ds-base-1.2.2-1.el5
>
There is a bug in 389-ds-base
Centos 5.3 x86_64
389-ds-console-doc-1.2.0-4.el5
389-ds-1.1.3-4.el5
389-admin-console-1.1.4-1.el5
389-admin-1.1.8-4.el5
389-dsgw-1.1.4-1.el5
389-ds-console-1.2.0-4.el5
389-admin-console-doc-1.1.4-1.el5
389-ds-base-1.2.2-1.el5
389-console-1.1.3-3.el5
Thanks
Rich Megginson wrote:
> Jeff Gamsby wrot
Jeff Gamsby wrote:
> Recently upgraded to Windows Server 2008. Passwords sync fromAD -> FDS fine.
> Accounts sync fine but passwords do not. I see this in the logs. Any ideas?
> This log entry is an attempted password change from the FDS console.
What platform? What version of 389?
> As a side,
15 matches
Mail list logo