Re: Resizing LVM-formatted partitions

2010-06-25 Thread Richard Shaw
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 1:19 AM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: > I've punted LVM, and I've punted /boot on all of my computers (I don't > need/want either of them).  That's 1 desktop, 1 laptop, and 1 server. I still like having a separate boot partitions for a couple of reasons. Although it's mounted,

Re: Resizing LVM-formatted partitions

2010-06-24 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 06/25/2010 08:19 AM, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: > On 06/25/2010 02:04 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> That said, I can't help wondering why Fedora's installer doesn't offer a >> "partitioned disk-layout" (like other distros do) and why Fedora hasn't >> adopted grub2, yet (like some other distros did

Re: Resizing LVM-formatted partitions

2010-06-24 Thread Kevin J. Cummings
On 06/25/2010 02:04 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 06/24/2010 10:39 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > >> I can't help wondering, not for the first time, whether LVM is really >> worth the hassle on a desktop machine. > > Depends, I am inclined to say. > > It's worth the hassle on real desktops, w

Re: Resizing LVM-formatted partitions

2010-06-24 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 06/24/2010 10:39 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > I can't help wondering, not for the first time, whether LVM is really > worth the hassle on a desktop machine. Depends, I am inclined to say. It's worth the hassle on real desktops, which I may be added further disks over their life-time. It'

Re: Resizing LVM-formatted partitions

2010-06-24 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Patrick O'Callaghan said: > So how can I be sure of the effect of lopping a bit > off the end of the VG and moving the whole thing up a bit? With LVM, a physical volume (PV) belongs to a volume group (VG) and is divided up into physical extents (PEs). PEs are then allocated to

Re: Resizing LVM-formatted partitions

2010-06-24 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 14:44 -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Patrick O'Callaghan said: > > My main disk has two partitions: > > > >Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System > > /dev/sda1 * 1 25 200781 83 Linux > > /dev/sda2

Re: Resizing LVM-formatted partitions

2010-06-24 Thread g
Chris Adams wrote: > The reason you have to do all of this is that /boot is not under LVM (it > can't be today because the boot loader can't load from LVM), so you have > to make space in the partition table. had not thought about that, and friend dave was not working with boot. so like you say

Re: Resizing LVM-formatted partitions

2010-06-24 Thread g
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > I want to increase the size of /boot from 190MB to 500MB. If I use > gparted, I'm afraid of screwing up the LVM partition since gparted > doesn't understand LVM. one of reasons i disliked and stopped using lvm in early days. no way to simply change a physical to logi

Re: Resizing LVM-formatted partitions

2010-06-24 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Patrick O'Callaghan said: > My main disk has two partitions: > >Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System > /dev/sda1 * 1 25 200781 83 Linux > /dev/sda2 26 20023 160633935 8e Linux LVM > > /dev/sda1 is /

Resizing LVM-formatted partitions

2010-06-24 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
My main disk has two partitions: Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 * 1 25 200781 83 Linux /dev/sda2 26 20023 160633935 8e Linux LVM /dev/sda1 is /boot. /dev/sda2 contains an LVM Volume Group with 3 logical