On 25/10/22 11:16, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Oct 22, 2022, at 21:56, Stephen Morris
wrote:
Hi,
As part of the install of F36 from the live CD I have, there is a
question asking whether or not to install 3rd party repositories. I
have done the install twice and replied to the message
On Oct 22, 2022, at 21:56, Stephen Morris wrote:
>
> Hi,
> As part of the install of F36 from the live CD I have, there is a
> question asking whether or not to install 3rd party repositories. I have done
> the install twice and replied to the message in the affirmative bot
Hi,
As part of the install of F36 from the live CD I have, there is a
question asking whether or not to install 3rd party repositories. I have
done the install twice and replied to the message in the affirmative
both times, and all that did was enable the rpmfusion nvidia and steam
get all a systems repositories
> in a data structure (list,dict,whatever). I've gotten most of the way
> there with the below which is able to get all repositories in
> /etc/yum.repos.d/*.repo. However, I can't find any reference to how
> to also make python3-dnf get the RHEL
On Mon, 01 Nov 2021 21:52:33 -
"Philip Kauffman" wrote:
> My goal is to use a python script to get all a systems repositories
> in a data structure (list,dict,whatever). I've gotten most of the way
> there with the below which is able to get all repositories in
&
Forgive my ignorance: I'm a long time Debian/Ubuntu user and admin, so I'm not
up on all the things everyone might take to be normal.
My goal is to use a python script to get all a systems repositories in a data
structure (list,dict,whatever). I've gotten most of the way there
On Thu, 2019-12-26 at 10:41 -0500, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> The wiki page is:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_maintainers_wishlist
>
Thanks.
poc
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to user
On Thu, 26 Dec 2019 at 11:42, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > I think I'm still not getting my point across. It might be convenient
> > to have a centralised place for users to request packages, and
> > currently there isn't (you've mentioned a Wiki page sev
Hi Patrick,
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I think I'm still not getting my point across. It might be convenient
> to have a centralised place for users to request packages, and
> currently there isn't (you've mentioned a Wiki page several times but
> not provided a URL, so maybe this already exists
On Thu, 2019-12-26 at 09:40 -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 6:45 PM Patrick O'Callaghan
> wrote:
>
> > Obviously. The point I'm attempting to make is that there seems to be
> > no standard way for non-developers to request a package, which is what
> > the OP is tryi
Hi
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 6:45 PM Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
>
> Obviously. The point I'm attempting to make is that there seems to be
> no standard way for non-developers to request a package, which is what
> the OP is trying to do. That could be intentional or it could be an
> oversight, but
On Mon, 2019-12-23 at 15:48 -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> HI
>
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 5:13 AM Patrick O'Callaghan
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2019-12-20 at 18:56 -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >
> > > https://developer.fedoraproject.org/deployment/copr/about.html
> >
> > That's fine for develop
HI
On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 5:13 AM Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-12-20 at 18:56 -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
> > https://developer.fedoraproject.org/deployment/copr/about.html
>
> That's fine for developers, but what about users?
>
There is no bright line dividing users and develo
On Fri, 2019-12-20 at 18:56 -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 8:04 AM Patrick O'Callaghan
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2019-12-16 at 17:10 -0700, linux guy wrote:
> > > Subject says it all.
> >
> > You should probably file a Request For Enhancement (RFE) on Bugzilla.
> >
> >
> T
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 8:04 AM Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-12-16 at 17:10 -0700, linux guy wrote:
> > Subject says it all.
>
> You should probably file a Request For Enhancement (RFE) on Bugzilla.
>
>
There isn't a good place to file this in Bugzilla.There is a wiki page
but I
On 17/12/2019 17:21, Richard Shaw wrote:
Since I did a *LITTLE* CFD in college I decided to take a look and as
I expected OpenFOAM will likely not be easy to package...
1. It's designed to install to $HOME or /opt (but I believe that can
be modified).
2. It uses a custom build system (wmake) a
Since I did a *LITTLE* CFD in college I decided to take a look and as I
expected OpenFOAM will likely not be easy to package...
1. It's designed to install to $HOME or /opt (but I believe that can be
modified).
2. It uses a custom build system (wmake) and the documentation seems to
indicate that i
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 6:12 PM linux guy wrote:
> Subject says it all.
>
Well, not exactly... :)
Since all packages are maintained by volunteers it might be a good idea to
explain:
1. What is the package about? A link to upstream for those that want more
information?
2. What the value of the
On Mon, 2019-12-16 at 17:10 -0700, linux guy wrote:
> Subject says it all.
You should probably file a Request For Enhancement (RFE) on Bugzilla.
poc
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@list
Subject says it all.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https:
Subject says it all.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https:
(responding to a few posts)
(Samuel)
> Thunderbird 68 was built September 6, so it might not be out
> of testing yet. You can add "--enablerepo-updates-testing"
> to dnf if it's not available in updates yet.
(Gordon)
> No, Thunderbird 60 is not 8 versions out-of-date. There was
> no major relea
"dnf check-update thunderbird" this afternoon.. No new versions are
available. Why are the repositories so far behind on Thunderbird?
Thunderbird 68 is currently in updates-testing:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-32c48d9a5f
You can install it using
sudo dnf
On 9/16/19 7:08 PM, home user wrote:
I have version 60.7.0; the person implied that the current version is
68. That's 8 versions out-of-date. I do a "dnf upgrade" every Thursday.
No, Thunderbird 60 is not 8 versions out-of-date. There was no major
release in between 60 and 68:
https://w
On 9/16/19 7:28 PM, home user wrote:
Thank-you, Ed.
> I am on F30 and
I'm at F29, and hoping to upgrade to 30 in mid-October. Am I stuck at
Thunderbird 60.7 until then?
Thunderbird 68 was built September 6, so it might not be out of testing
yet. You can add "--enablerepo-updates-test
On 9/17/19 11:06 AM, home user wrote:
I don't recall ever having touched that file. To check...
---
-bash.4[dnf]: pwd
/etc/dnf
-bash.5[dnf]: cat dnf.conf
[main]
gpgcheck=1
installonly_limit=3
clean_requirements_on_remove=True
-bash.6[dnf]:
---
I suppose that until I upgra
> Sorry, the file /etc/dnf/dnf.conf
I don't recall ever having touched that file. To check...
---
-bash.4[dnf]: pwd
/etc/dnf
-bash.5[dnf]: cat dnf.conf
[main]
gpgcheck=1
installonly_limit=3
clean_requirements_on_remove=True
-bash.6[dnf]:
---
I suppose that until I upgrade
Hi,
Ed Greshko:
>> Have you put an "exclude" in the dnf config?
the anonymous home user:
> "dnf config"?
> Where is that?
When unsure, you can use the locate command to find likely suspects
(e.g. "dnf" named things) in the usual places for configuration files
(i.e. inside /etc).
locate dnf|gr
On 9/17/19 10:28 AM, home user wrote:
Thank-you, Ed.
> I am on F30 and
I'm at F29, and hoping to upgrade to 30 in mid-October. Am I stuck at
Thunderbird 60.7 until then?
> Have you put an "exclude" in the dnf config?
"dnf config"?
Where is that?
And are you saying I do want an "exclude"
Thank-you, Ed.
> I am on F30 and
I'm at F29, and hoping to upgrade to 30 in mid-October. Am I stuck at
Thunderbird 60.7 until then?
> Have you put an "exclude" in the dnf config?
"dnf config"?
Where is that?
And are you saying I do want an "exclude" there, or I don't want an
"exclude"
That's 8
versions out-of-date. I do a "dnf upgrade" every Thursday.
I did a "dnf check-update thunderbird" this afternoon.. No new versions are
available. Why are the repositories so far behind on Thunderbird?
I am on F30 and
[egreshko@meimei ~]$ rpm -q thunderbi
a "dnf upgrade" every Thursday.
I did a "dnf check-update thunderbird" this afternoon.. No new versions are
available. Why are the repositories so far behind on Thunderbird?
I am on F30 and
[egreshko@meimei ~]$ rpm -q thunderbird
thunderbird-68.1.0-1.fc30.x86_64
day.
I did a "dnf check-update thunderbird" this afternoon.. No new versions
are available. Why are the repositories so far behind on Thunderbird?
thanks,
Bill.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To un
Yeah, I've went through the site and there is no release of Russian Fedora
based on F30 yet. In fact there is only 1 news record in 2019, so I'm not sure
it's a very active community (but again, I just did a quick look at the site).
The repo seems to be very specific to this respin of Fedora,
On 6/25/19 7:40 AM, Ger van Dijck wrote:
I installed (long ago) russianfedora-nonfree- (free)
release-28-1.noarch.rpm ; After upgrading to Fedora 29 no problems !
Is there a version for Fedora 30 ?
I can't read the Russian, but it doesn't appear that they have made a
release for F30 yet.
__
On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 18:16:20 +0200, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 6/24/19 4:56 AM, Ger van Dijck wrote:
I have a little problem : When updating Fedora 30 ( Yum or Dnfdragora )
I
get the following messages :
Failed to synchronize cache , Ignoring repositories :
Russianfedora /free-updates
On 6/24/19 4:56 AM, Ger van Dijck wrote:
I have a little problem : When updating Fedora 30 ( Yum or Dnfdragora ) I
get the following messages :
Failed to synchronize cache , Ignoring repositories :
Russianfedora /free-updates
/non-free-updates
/free
Hi all ,
I have a little problem : When updating Fedora 30 ( Yum or Dnfdragora ) I
get the following messages :
Failed to synchronize cache , Ignoring repositories :
Russianfedora /free-updates
/non-free-updates
/free
/non-free
On 6/23/19 8:00 PM, Ger van Dijck wrote:
> Question : What is wrong and how can I manage to solve this problem ?
If I've found what I think is the correct info, they haven't built anything for
F30.
http://mirror.yandex.ru/fedora/russianfedora/russianfedora/free/fedora/releases/
--
Right: I di
On 6/23/19 8:00 PM, Ger van Dijck wrote:
> I have a little problem : When updating Fedora 30 ( Yum or Dnfdragora ) I
> get the following messages :
>
>
> Failed to synchronize cache , Ignoring repositories :
>
>
> Russianfedora /free-updates
>
Hi all ,
I have a little problem : When updating Fedora 30 ( Yum or Dnfdragora ) I
get the following messages :
Failed to synchronize cache , Ignoring repositories :
Russianfedora /free-updates
/non-free-updates
/free
/non-free
Question
Hi Adrian
did you try to do (before the update):
dnf clean metadata
and if this does not help either
dnf clean all
?
suomi
On 05/04/2019 09.11, Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
Hi! I am trying to upgrade my long overdue f27 to f29 (to prepare for
f30 :)) but i have problems with :
Error: Failed to sync
Hi! I am trying to upgrade my long overdue f27 to f29 (to prepare for
f30 :)) but i have problems with :
Error: Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'updates'
I already updated my system by pointing the baseurls to the archive
but then if i try
dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 11:10:47PM +, CLOSE Dave wrote:
> I have a script that uses rsync to pull the Fedora repositories nightly.
> If I run it manually, it works flawlessly. But if it runs via cron, I
I encourage you to use Quick Fedora Mirror instead:
https://pagure.io/quick-fedora-
On 12/21/18 12:05 PM, CLOSE Dave wrote:
> Yesterday, I wrote:
>
>> I have a script that uses rsync to pull the Fedora repositories
>> nightly. If I run it manually, it works flawlessly. But if it runs
>> via cron, I get an error on all the Fedora 28 repositories. I do
Yesterday, I wrote:
> I have a script that uses rsync to pull the Fedora repositories
> nightly. If I run it manually, it works flawlessly. But if it runs
> via cron, I get an error on all the Fedora 28 repositories. I do not
> get the error on Fedora 27 or RPMFusion 27 or 28 repos
Rick Stevens wrote:
> Running interactively but not under cron usually indicates that you've
> forgotten that running under cron, you don't have the same environment
> as you do in an interactive session. So, make sure your environment is
> set correctly in the script (such as the PATH and such).
On 12/20/18 3:10 PM, CLOSE Dave wrote:
> I have a script that uses rsync to pull the Fedora repositories nightly.
> If I run it manually, it works flawlessly. But if it runs via cron, I
> get an error on all the Fedora 28 repositories. I do not get the error
> on Fedora 27 or RPMFus
I have a script that uses rsync to pull the Fedora repositories nightly.
If I run it manually, it works flawlessly. But if it runs via cron, I
get an error on all the Fedora 28 repositories. I do not get the error
on Fedora 27 or RPMFusion 27 or 28 repositories. The script sets timeout
values to
On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 17:45 +0100, Ger van Dijck wrote:
> Hi all ,
>
> A question : How can I remove a repositorie in YUM repositories ?
>
> Some way or another certain defined reposiories causes when trying
> updating the system conflicts.
You should probably switch to d
Hi all ,
A question : How can I remove a repositorie in YUM repositories ?
Some way or another certain defined reposiories causes when trying
updating the system conflicts.
Kind regards,
Ger van Dijck.
--
Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com
ntext to Docker daemon 3.072 kB
Sending build context to Docker daemon
Step 0 : FROM fedora
---> 834629358fe2
Step 1 : MAINTAINER tester
---> Using cache
---> 16e9f95d5ab0
Step 2 : RUN yum -y update && yum clean all
---> Running in 88b98222885a
One of the configured re
On 11/11/2012 02:05 PM, Craig Goodyear wrote:
> On 11/11/2012 01:40 PM, Thomas Cameron wrote:
>> On 11/06/2012 10:25 PM, Steve wrote:
>>> libreCAD is the take over of what used to be QCAD.QCAD has been
>>> forked into a closed source application and work on the open source
>>> application appea
On 11/11/2012 01:40 PM, Thomas Cameron wrote:
On 11/06/2012 10:25 PM, Steve wrote:
libreCAD is the take over of what used to be QCAD.QCAD has been
forked into a closed source application and work on the open source
application appears to have ceased.
The libreCAD team has been doing an admi
On 11/11/2012 12:40 PM, Thomas Cameron wrote:
I was really stoked to hear about this, but then I tried to compile it
on F17 and had no luck.
It bombs saying:
Until about 2 weeks ago there was a Fedora 17 RPM here.
http://librecad.org/cms/home/installation/rpm-packages.html
I'd email the powers
On 11/06/2012 10:25 PM, Steve wrote:
> I request that libreCAD be added to the Fedora repositories.
> http://librecad.org/cms/home.html
>
> libreCAD is the take over of what used to be QCAD.QCAD has been
> forked into a closed source application and work on the open sourc
On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 14:43 -0800, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Friday, 9. November 2012. 8.52.47 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 15:51 +0400, Hiisi wrote:
> > > On 8 November 2012 06:28, Patrick O'Callaghan
> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 19:10 -0500, Mark LaPierre wro
On Friday, 9. November 2012. 8.52.47 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 15:51 +0400, Hiisi wrote:
> > On 8 November 2012 06:28, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 19:10 -0500, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> > >> Dude's, I was not suggesting that this should be added t
On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 15:51 +0400, Hiisi wrote:
> On 8 November 2012 06:28, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 19:10 -0500, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> >> Dude's, I was not suggesting that this should be added to the CentOS
> >> repos. I merely posted it to this list to help someone
On 8 November 2012 06:28, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 19:10 -0500, Mark LaPierre wrote:
>> Dude's, I was not suggesting that this should be added to the CentOS
>> repos. I merely posted it to this list to help someone who was
>> looking for Linux compatible CAD software.
>
On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 19:10 -0500, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> Dude's, I was not suggesting that this should be added to the CentOS
> repos. I merely posted it to this list to help someone who was
> looking for Linux compatible CAD software.
Did anyone mention Centos or am I missing something here?
On 11/07/2012 04:12 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Hiisi mailto:hi...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote:
On 7 November 2012 08:25, Steve mailto:linuxguy...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> I request that libreCAD be added to the Fedora repositories.
> http:
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Hiisi wrote:
> On 7 November 2012 08:25, Steve wrote:
> > I request that libreCAD be added to the Fedora repositories.
> > http://librecad.org/cms/home.html
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_maintainers_wishlist
If it was a complet
On 7 November 2012 08:25, Steve wrote:
> I request that libreCAD be added to the Fedora repositories.
> http://librecad.org/cms/home.html
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_maintainers_wishlist
--
Hiisi.
Registered Linux User #487982. Be counted at: https://linuxcounter.net/
--
Spande
I request that libreCAD be added to the Fedora repositories.
http://librecad.org/cms/home.html
libreCAD is the take over of what used to be QCAD.QCAD has been
forked into a closed source application and work on the open source
application appears to have ceased.
The libreCAD team has
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeronimo Calvo
jeronimocal...@hush.com
On 24 Oct 2011, at 19:55, Maxime Alarie wrote:
> Thanks for the quick reply,
>
> The file is empty..
>
Create a new repo file.
rhel6.repo
and add the following:
=
# CentOS-Base.repo
#
#
En 24/10/2011 14:55:53, Maxime Alarie escribió:
> # Managed by (rhsm) subscription-manager
If you have a valid subscription refer to:
*
http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Deployment_Guide/index.html
Part II. "Package Management", Chapter 4: "Product Subscript
Thanks for the quick reply,
The file is empty..
[root@RHELV6 yum.repos.d]# cat redhat.repo
#
# Red Hat Repositories
# Managed by (rhsm) subscription-manager
#[root@RHELV6 yum.repos.d]#
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:users-boun
En 24/10/2011 13:19:28, Maxime Alarie escribió:
> Im just wondering if someone know how to install packages on RHEL 6.1, I
> have installed the demo version but the repositories are empty
You should have in "/etc/yum.repos.d/" folder a file "rhel-base.repo",
ch
Hi,
Im just wondering if someone know how to install packages on RHEL 6.1, I
have installed the demo version but the repositories are empty. I want
to install a GUI on that, along with DB2 and Websphere..
Anybody know how to do that?
Thanks.
--
users mailing list
users
On 02/10/2011 04:10 AM, Clemens Eisserer wrote:
> Thanks,
>
>> # yum install gnome-packagekit
>>
>> Run gpk-application
> Thats strange - all the package-groups are empty, as with kpackagekit.
> Is this a known problem/bug?
Nope.Try yum clean all; yum makecache
Rahul
--
users mailing list
Thanks,
> # yum install gnome-packagekit
>
> Run gpk-application
Thats strange - all the package-groups are empty, as with kpackagekit.
Is this a known problem/bug?
Thanks, Clemens
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.f
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 10:30 +0100, Clemens Eisserer wrote:
> yum a bit clumsy when searching packages without knowing its name ;)
You could try yumex as an interface to yum.
--
[tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686
Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignore
On 02/09/2011 03:14 PM, Clemens Eisserer wrote:
> Hi Jatin,
>
> Thanks for your answer.
> Basically I would prefer the gtk packagekit frontend that is presented
> during the fedora installation as part of the installer.
In that case,
# yum install gnome-packagekit
Run gpk-application
Rahul
--
Hi Jatin,
Thanks for your answer.
Basically I would prefer the gtk packagekit frontend that is presented
during the fedora installation as part of the installer.
Thanks, Clemens
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedor
On Wednesday 09 February 2011 03:00 PM, Clemens Eisserer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Suding the install process a rather nice tool is displayed where
> packages/groups can be selected for installation.
>
> Is this tool available also when fedora is installed, and if so what
> it it's name?
> KPackagekit simpl
On Wednesday 09 February 2011 03:00 PM, Clemens Eisserer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Suding the install process a rather nice tool is displayed where
> packages/groups can be selected for installation.
>
> Is this tool available also when fedora is installed, and if so what
> it it's name?
> KPackagekit simpl
Hi,
Suding the install process a rather nice tool is displayed where
packages/groups can be selected for installation.
Is this tool available also when fedora is installed, and if so what
it it's name?
KPackagekit simply is too buggy for my taste, and yum a bit clumsy
when searching packages with
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Henry Wyatt wrote:
> can users add software to repositories or not
>
> --
> Henry E. Wyatt, Jr.
>
you can submit your package for review, if approved your packaged is
added to fedora repository`s
--
Itamar Reis Peixoto
--
use
yes it does, thank you very much
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 08:14 -0400, Henry Wyatt wrote:
> > can users add software to repositories or not
>
> You can add software to any repo you own. You can't in general
On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 08:14 -0400, Henry Wyatt wrote:
> can users add software to repositories or not
You can add software to any repo you own. You can't in general add stuff
to a repo you don't own. You don't own the standard Fedora repos. Does
this answer your question?
poc
can users add software to repositories or not
--
Henry E. Wyatt, Jr.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
82 matches
Mail list logo
