On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 13:58, wrote:
> Hi Fernando,
>
> I'm used to not trust proprietary software vendor repos and packages
Virtualbox is Free Software, with a GPL license. "Proprietary software
vendors" also applies to lots of other firms that also sponsor open
source projects. You need to co
support for Fedora users"
>Sent: Seg, Mai 30, 2011, 13:49 PM
>Subject: Re: Re: KVM x VirtualBox
>
>On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 13:27, wrote:
>> I wonder if there's some reson it would be better not to use Oracle repos.
>
>Well, I think your logic is reversed: Oracle
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 13:27, wrote:
> I wonder if there's some reson it would be better not to use Oracle repos.
Well, I think your logic is reversed: Oracle repos will have always
the latest builds. Can you say the same about the others?.
> But the main question is: will VirtualBox and KVM w
Hi Fernando,
I know Oracle provides repos, but as the well-known community based repo from
rpmforge also does I wonder if there's some reson it would be better not to use
Oracle repos.
But the main question is: will VirtualBox and KVM work in parallel? Or will one
conflict with the other?
[]
